'Things fall apart': Social imaginaries and the politics of cohesion

Critical Policy Studies

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 146-163

  Dobbernack, Jan ^a  

^a ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Critical policy analysis; Governance; Social cohesion; Social imaginaries

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958763018     PISSN: 19460171     EISSN: 1946018X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2010.490637     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Amin, A., 2005. Local community on trial. Economy and society, 34 (4), 612-633.
2. Bade, K. and Münz, R., eds. 2008. Migrationsreport 2008. Fakten-Analysen-Perspektiven. Frankfurt/Main: Campus.
3. Barclay, P., 1994. Joseph Rowntree Foundation inquiry into income and wealth, volume 1. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
4. Beauvais, C. and Jenson, J., 2002. Social cohesion: updating the state of the research. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Network Discussion Paper, No. 22.
5. Berger, P., 1998. The limits of social cohesion: conflict and mediation in pluralist societies. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
6. Berman, M., 1983. All that is solid melts into air: the experience of modernity. London: Verso.
7. Blunkett, D., 2002. What does citizenship mean today? The Observer, 15 September. Available from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/sep/15/race.thinktanks [Accessed 12 October 2009].
8. Blunkett, D., 2004. New challenges for race equality and community cohesion in the 21st century. London: Home Office Communication Directorate. Available from: http://www.ippr.org.uk/uploadedFiles/events/Blunkettspeech.pdf [Accessed 1 September 2009].
9. Bodi, F., 2002. Muslims got Cantle. What they needed was Scarman. The Guardian, 1 July. Available from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/jul/01/religion.equality [Accessed 10 October 2009].
10. Bodi, F., 2006. Birds of a feather. The Guardian, 7 June. Available from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/ commentisfree/2006/jun/07/wrongagaincantle [Accessed 10 October 2009].
11. Breton, R., 1980. Cultural boundaries and the cohesion of Canada. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.
12. Brooks, D., 2009. The politics of cohesion. The New York Times, 20 January, p. A33.
13. Brown, W., 2006. Regulating aversion. Tolerance in the age of identity and empire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14. Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P.M., eds., 1991. The Foucault effect: studies in governmental rationality. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
15. Burnett, J., 2004. Community, cohesion and the state. Race & class, 45 (3), 1-18.
16. Cantle, T., 2001. Community cohesion: a report of the independent review team. London: Home Office.
17. Cantle, T., 2005. Community cohesion: a new framework for race and diversity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
18. Cantle, T., 2006. The power of cohesion. The Guardian, 9 June. Available from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2006/jun/09/post144 [Accessed 10 October 2009].
19. Castoriadis, C., 1987. The imaginary institution of society. Cambridge: Polity.
20. Chevallier, J., 2004. L'État Régulateur. Revue Française d'Administration Publique, 111 (3), 473-482.
21. Clarke, T., 2001. Report of the Burnley task force. Burnley: Burnley Borough Council.
22. Commission on Integration and Cohesion, 2007. Our shared future. Wetherby: CICC.
23. Council of Europe, 2000. Strategy for social cohesion. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
24. Council of Europe, 2004. Security through social cohesion: proposals for a new socio-economic governance. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing,.
25. Council of the European Communities, 1986. Single European act and final act. Luxemburg: Office of Official Publications.
26. David, F., 2004. Le Président de la République, Garant de la Cohésion Sociale. Revue Française de Droit Constitutionnel, 59 (3), 533-566.
27. Dean, M., 1999. Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
28. Dean, M., 2003. Culture governance and individualisation. In: H.P. Bang, ed. Governance as social and political communication. Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press, 117-139.
29. Deleuze, G., 1980. Foreword: the rise of the social. In: J. Donzelot, ed. The policing of families. Welfare versus the state. London: Hutchinson, ix-xvii.
30. Denham, J., 2001. Building cohesive communities. A report of the ministerial group on public order and community cohesion. London: Home Office.
31. Department for Communities and Local Government, 2008. The government's response to the commission on integration and cohesion. London: Communities and Local Government Publications.
32. Deutscher Bundestag, 2002. Bürgerschaftliches Engagement: auf dem Weg in eine zukunftsfähige Bürgergesellschaft. Bericht der Enquete-Kommission 'Zukunft des Bürgerschaftlichen Engagements'. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
33. Donzelot, J., 1994. L'Invention du Social. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
34. Donzelot, J., 2006. Refonder la Cohésion Sociale. Ésprit, 330, 5-23.
35. Durkheim, É., 1922. De la Division du Travail Social. 7th ed. Paris: Félix Alcan.
36. Emmanuelli, X., 1997. La maladie du lien. Le Monde, 15 April, p. 11.
37. Europe, C.O., 2004. Revised strategy for social cohesion. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
38. Fischer, K., 2006. Moralkommunikation der Macht. Politische Konstruktion sozialer Kohäsion im Wohlfahrtsstaat. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
39. Forrest, R. and Kearns, A., 2001. Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban studies, 38 (12), 2125-2143.
40. Giddens, A., 1998. The third way. Cambridge: Polity Press.
41. Gilbert, N., 2002. Transformation of the welfare state: the silent surrender of public responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Glynos, J., 2001. The grip of ideology: a Lacanian approach to the theory of ideology. Journal of political ideologies, 6 (2), 191-214.
43. Glynos, J. and Howarth, D.R., 2007. Logics of critical explanation in social and political theory. London: Routledge.
44. Glynos, J. and Stavrakakis, Y., 2003. Encounters of the real kind: sussing out the limits of Laclau's embrace of Lacan. Journal for Lacanian studies, 1 (1), 110-128.
45. Hay, C., 1995. Mobilization through interpellation: James Bulger, juvenile crime and the construction of a moral panic. Social and legal studies, 4 (2), 197-223.
46. Heite, C., Klein, A., Landhäußer, S. and Ziegler, H., 2007. Das Elend der Sozialen Arbeit. Die 'neue Unterschicht' und die Schwächung des Sozialen. In: F. Kessl, C. Reutlinger and H. Ziegler, eds. Erziehung zur Armut. Soziale Arbeit und die 'neue Unterschicht'. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 55-79.
47. Helly, D., 1999. Une Injonction: Appartenir, Participer. Le Retour de la Cohésion Sociale et du Bon Citoyen. Lien Social et Politiques, 41, 35-46.
48. Helly, D., 2008. La légitimité en panne? Immigration, sécurité, cohésion sociale, nativisme. Cultures & conflits, articles inédits. Available from: http://www.conflits.org/index17270.html [Accessed 5 September 2009].
49. Hobbes, T., 1978. Leviathan. Glasgow: William Collins.
50. Hutton, W., 1995. The state we're in. London: Jonathan Cape.
51. iCoCo, 2006. Challenging local communities to change in Oldham. Review of community cohesion in Oldham. Coventry: Institute for Community Cohesion.
52. Joppke, C., 2004. The retreat of multiculturalism in the liberal state: theory and policy. The British journal of sociology, 55 (2), 237-257.
53. Jupp, J., 2007. The quest for harmony. In: J. Jupp, J. Nieuwenhuysen and E. Dawson, eds. Social cohesion in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 9-20.
54. Klein, A., 2001. Der Diskurs der Zivilgesellschaft: politische Kontexte und demokratietheoretische Bezüge der neueren Begriffsverwendung. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
55. Klein, A., Kern, K., Geißel, B. and Berger, M., 2004. Zivilgesellschaft und Sozialkapital: Herausforderungen politischer und sozialer Integration. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
56. Laclau, E., 1990. New reflections on the revolution of our time. London: Verso.
57. Laclau, E., 2005. On populist reason. London: Verso.
58. Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C., 2001. Hegemony and socialist strategy: towards a radical democratic politics. 2nd ed. London: Verso.
59. Lessenich, S., 2008. Die Neuerfindung des Sozialen: Der Sozialstaat im flexiblen Kapitalismus. Bielefeld: Transcript.
60. Lockwood, D., 1999. Civic integration and social cohesion. In: I. Gough and G. Olofsson, eds. Capitalism and social cohesion: essays on exclusion and integration. London: MacMillan, 63-83.
61. Marquand, D., 1996. Moralists and hedonists. In: D. Marquand and A. Seldon, eds. The ideas that shaped post-war Britain. London: Fontana Press, 5-28.
62. McGhee, D., 2003. Moving to 'our' common ground-a critical examination of community cohesion discourse in twenty-first century Britain. The sociological review, 51 (3), 376-404.
63. Meer, N. and Modood, T., 2009. The multicultural state we're in: Muslims, 'multiculture' and the 'civic re-balancing' of British multiculturalism. Political studies, 57 (3), 473-497.
64. Ministère de l'emploi, 2004. Projet de loi de programmation pour la cohésion sociale. Paris: Ministère de l'emploi, du travail et de la cohésion sociale.
65. Ministère de l'emploi, 2005a. Plan de Cohésion Sociale. Paris: Ministère de l'emploi, du travail et de la cohésion sociale.
66. Ministère de l'emploi, 2005b. 2005, une année d'actions pour la cohésion sociale. Principales action du Ministère de l'emploi, de la cohésion sociale et du logement. Paris: Ministère de l'emploi, du travail et de la cohésion sociale.
67. Ministère de l'emploi, 2006. Mise en oeuvre du Plan de cohésion sociale. Paris: Ministère de l'emploi, du travail et de la cohésion sociale.
68. Mulgan, G., 1995. Beyond the lure of off-the-shelf ethics. The Independent, 30 January, p. 13.
69. OECD, 1997. Societal cohesion and the globalising economy. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
70. Opielka, M., 2002. Zur sozialpolitischen Theorie der Bürgergesellschaft. Zeitschrift für Sozialreform, 5, 563-585.
71. Ouseley, H., 2001. Community pride not prejudice: making diversity work in Bradford. Bradford Vision.
72. Oxford English Dictionary, 1989. The Oxford English Dictionary. Volume III: cham-creeky. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
73. Pahl, R.E., 1991. The search for social cohesion: from Durkheim to the European Commission. European journal of sociology, 32 (22), 345-360.
74. Potter, J., Wetherell, M., Gill, R. and Edwards, D., 1990. Discourse: noun, verb or social practice? Philosophical psychology, 3 (2), 205-217.
75. Prins, G. and Salisbury, R., 2008. Risk, threat and security: the case of the United Kingdom. RUSI journal, 153 (1), 22-27.
76. Robinson, D., 2005. The search for community cohesion: key themes and dominant concepts of the public policy agenda. Urban studies, 42 (8), 1411-1427.
77. Roché, S., 1990. Intervention publique et sociabilité. Essai sur le problème de l'insécurité en France. Déviance et société, 14 (1), 1-16.
78. Schäuble, W., 2009. Was uns verbindet. Available from: http://www.wolfgang-schaeuble.de/index.php?id=36&textid=1307&page=1 [Accessed 10 March 2010].
79. Schröder, G., 2000. Die zivile Bürgergesellschaft. Anregungen zu einer Neubestimmung der Aufgaben von Staat und Gesellschaft. Die neue Gesellschaft, 4, 200-207.
80. Sibille, H., 1994. Cohésion sociale: un devoir d'utopie. Le Monde, 9 November, p. 4.
81. Stavrakakis, Y., 2007. The Lacanian left: psychoanalysis, theory, politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
82. Stone, M. and Edwards, D., 2007. Blocking the way to social cohesion. Available from: http://www.civitas.org.uk/pdf/Hayes.pdf [Accessed 10 December 2009].
83. Strachwitz, R.G., 2002. Zartes Pflänzchen: das Konzept der Bürgergesellschaft. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 26 February, p. 10.
84. Sulkunen, P., 2007. Re-inventing the social contract. Acta sociologica, 50 (3), 325-333.
85. Sulkunen, P., 2009. The saturated society: governing risk and lifestyles in consumer culture. London: Sage.
86. Taylor, C., 2002. Modern social imaginaries. Public culture, 14 (1), 91-124.
87. Taylor, C., 2004. Modern social imaginaries. Durham, NC/London: Duke University Press.
88. The Guardian, 2002. Divided response to Oldham report. The Guardian, 2 July. Available from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2002/jul/02/guardianletters4 [Accessed 10 March 2009].
89. Thierse, W., 2002. Bürgergesellschaft. Gemeinsame Herausforderungen gemeinsam lösen. Available from: http://webarchiv.bundestag.de/archive/2008/0506/aktuell/presse/2002/pz_0206253.html [Accessed 10 September 2009].
90. Vasta, E., 2009. The controllability of difference: social solidarity and immigrant integration. Oxford: University of Oxford, Centre on Migration, Policy and Society. Working Paper No. 71.
91. Wodak, R., 2001. What CDA is about. In: R. Wodak and M. Meyer, eds. Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage, 1-13.