On meta-analyses of imaging data and the mixture of records

NeuroImage

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 323-330

  Ramsey, J D ^a   Spirtes, P ^a   Glymour, C ^a,b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN AND MACHINE COGNITION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYES THEOREM; BRAIN FUNCTION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NEUROIMAGING; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BRAIN; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC;

EID: 79958762347     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.065     Document Type: Note

References (24)

1. Chen R., Herskovitz E.H. Machine-learning techniques for building a diagnostic model for very mild dementia. NeuroImage 2010, 52:234-244.
2. Chen H., Yang Q., Liao W., Gong Q., Shan S. Evaluation of the effective connectivity of supplementary motor areas during motor imagery using Granger causality mapping. NeuroImage 2009, 47:1844-1853.
3. Figuieredo M., Jain A. Unsupervised learning of finite mixture models. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2002, 24:381-396.
4. Friston K., Harrison L., Penny W. Dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage 2003, 19:1273-1302.
5. Gates K., Molenaar P.C.M., Hillary F.G., Ram N., Rovine M. Automatic search for fMRI connectivity mapping: an alternative to Granger causality testing using formal equivalences among SEM path modeling, VAR, and unified SEM. NeuroImage 2010, 50:1118-1125.
6. Laird A., Robbins J.M., Li K., Price L.R., Cykowski M.D., Narayana S., Laird R., Franklin C., Fox P. Modeling motor connectivity using TMS/PET and structural equation modeling. NeuroImage 2008, 41:424-436.
7. Marreiros A., Kiebel S.J., Friston K.J. A dynamic causal model study of neural population dynamics. NeuroImage 2009, 51:91-101.
8. Meek, C., 1997. Graphical Models: Selecting Causal and Statistical Models, Ph.D Thesis, Department of Philosophy, Carnegie Mellon University.
9. Neumann J., Fox P., Turner R., Lohmann G. Learning partially directed functional networks from meta-analysis imaging data. NeuroImage 2010, 49(2):1372-1384.
10. Pearl J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems 1988, Morgan Kaufmann.
11. Pearl J. Causality 2000, The Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. Rajapakse J.C., Zhou Juan Learning effective brain connectivityity with dynamic Bayesian networks. NeuroImage 2007, 37:749-760.
13. Ramsey J., Spirtes P., Zhang J. Adjacency-Faithfulness and Conservative Causal Inference. Proceedings of the 22nd Convergence on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 2006, 401-408. AUAI Press, Oregon.
14. Ramsey J., Hanson C., Hanson S., Halchenko Y., Poldrack R., Glymour C. Six problems for causal inference from fMRI. NeuroImage 2010, 49(2):1545-1558.
15. Roebroeck A., Formisano E., Gabriel R. Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI. NeuroImage 2005, 25:230-242.
16. Shimizu S., Hyvärinen A., Kano Y., Hoyer P.O. Discovery of non-gaussian linear causal models using ICA. Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-2005) 2005, 526-533.
17. Simpson E.H. The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 1951, 13:238-241.
18. Spirtes P., Glymour C., Scheines R. Causation, Prediction and Search 1993, 2000, Springer.
19. 2000, MIT Press. 2nd ed.
20. TETRAD IV, 2010. http://www.phil.cmu.edu/tetrad/.
21. Theissen B., Meek, Heckerman D., Chickering D.M. Learning mixtures of DAG models. Proc. Of the 13th Conference on Uncertainty in AI 1997, 504-513.
22. Tillman R.E., Danks D., Glymour C. Integrating locally learned causal structures with overlapping variables. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2009, 21:1665-1672.
23. Verbeek J., Vlassis N., Krobe B. Efficient greedy learning of Gaussian mixture models. Neural Comput. 2003, 15:469-485.
24. Yule G. Notes on the theory of the distribution of attributes in statistics. Biometrika 1903, 2:121-134.