Pooling of dentin microtensile bond strength data improves clinical correlation

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 107-110

  Heintze, Siegward D ^a   Rousson, Valentin ^b  

^a IVOCLAR VIVADENT AG   (Liechtenstein)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Bond strength test; Class V restorations; Clinical relevance; Data pooling

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; RESIN CEMENT;

ARTICLE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL RESEARCH; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); REPRODUCIBILITY; SHEAR STRENGTH; STATISTICAL MODEL; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH CERVIX;

DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL RESEARCH; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MATERIALS TESTING; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESIN CEMENTS; SHEAR STRENGTH; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH CERVIX;

EID: 79958698138     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: 17579988     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a21345     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Courson F, Bouter D, Ruse ND, Degrange M. Bond strengths of nine current dentine adhesive systems to primary and permanent teeth. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 296-303.
2. De Munck J, Mine A, van Ende A, Poitevin A, Peumans M, van Meerbeek B. Bond strength tests for dental adhesives, a systematic review [abstract 3752]. J Dent Res 2010; 89(special issue B).
3. Heintze SD, Ruffieux C, Rousson V. Clinical performance of cervical restorations-A meta-analysis. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 993-1000.
4. Heintze SD, Thunpithayakul C, Armstrong SR, Rousson V. Correlation between microtensile bond strength data and clinical outcome of Class V restorations and clinical outcome of Class V restorations. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 114-125.
5. ISO. Dental materials - Testing of adhesion to tooth structure. Technical Specification 2003; No. 11405.
6. Leloup G, D’Hoore W, Bouter D, Degrange M, Vreven J. Meta-analytical review of factors involved in dentin adherence. J Dent Res 2001; 80: 1605-1614.
7. Pecora N, Yaman P, Dennison J, Herrero A. Comparison of shear bond strength relative to two testing devices. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 511-515.
8. Sadek FT, Goracci C, Cardoso PEC, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Comparative study of a filled and an unfilled version of a dentin bonding system to dental hard tissues. Dent South Africa 2005; 7: 27-32.
9. Sarr M, Kane AW, Vreven J, Mine A, Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial characterization of 11 contemporary adhesives bonded to bur-cut dentin. Oper Dent 2010; 35: 94-104.
10. Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain MV. Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review. Dent Mater 2010; 26: e78-93.
11. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, De Munck J. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater 2010; 26: e100-121.