The comparative study of interpersonal relationships

Family Science

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 37-47

  Cook, William L ^a  

^a MAINE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Family relationship; Marital studies; Parent child studies; Sibling studies; Statistical methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958275991     PISSN: 19424620     EISSN: 19424639     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19424620903392614     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Atzaba-Poria, N., & Pike, A. (2008). Correlates of differential parental treatment: Parental and contextual factors during middle childhood. Child Development, 79, 217-232.
2. Bell, R.Q. (1968). A reinterpretation of the direction of effects in studies of socialization. Psychological Review, 75, 81-95.
3. Bernt, T.J. (1981). The effects of friendship on prosocial intentions and behavior. Child Development, 52, 636-643.
4. Birchler, G.R., Weiss, R.B., & Vincent, J.P. (1975). Multimethod analysis of social reinforcement exchange between martially distressed and non-distressed spouse and stranger dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 349-360.
5. Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples: Money, work and sex. New York, NY: William Morrow.
6. Branje, S., van Aken, M., & van Lieshout, C. (2002) Relational support in families with adolescents. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 351-362.
7. Buist, K., Dekovic, M., Meeus, W., & van Aken, M. (2004). Attachment in adolescence: A social relations model analysis. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 826-850.
8. Collins, N.L., & Read, S.J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 644-663.
9. Cook, W.L. (1993). Interdependence and the interpersonal sense of control: An analysis of family relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 587-601.
10. Cook, W.L. (1994). A structural equation model of dyadic relationships within the family system. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 500-509.
11. Cook, W.L. (2000). Understanding attachment in family context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 285-294.
12. Cook, W.L. (2005). The SRM approach to family assessment: An introduction and case example. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 216-225.
13. Cook, W.L., & Dreyer, A.S. (1984). The social relations model: A new approach to the analysis of family-dyadic interaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 679-687.
14. Cook, W.L., & Kenny, D.A. (2006). Examining the validity of self-report assessments of family functioning: A question of the level of analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 209-216.
15. Daniels, D., & Plomin, R. (1985). Differential experience of siblings within the same family. Developmental Psychology, 21, 747-760.
16. Delsing, M.J.M.H., van Aken, M.A.G., Oud, J.H.L., de Bruyn, E.E.J., & Scholte, R.H.J. (2005). Family loyalty and adolescent problem behavior: The validity of the family group effect. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15(2), 127-150.
17. Eichelsheim, V.I., Dekovic, M., Buist, K.L., & Cook, W.L. (2009). The social relations model in family studies: A systematic review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 71, 1052-1069.
18. Fitzpatrick, M.A., & Dindia, K. (1990). Special versus ordinary dyads: A round-robin analysis of interaction patterns. In T.W. Draper & A.C. Marcos (Eds.), Family variables: Conceptualization, measurement, and use (pp. 179-196). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Galton, F. (1874). English men of science: Their nature and nurture. London: McMillan.
20. Gonzalez, R., & Griffin, D.W. (1999). The correlation analysis of dyad-level data in the distinguishable case. Personal Relationships, 6, 449-469.
21. Jacklin, C.N., & Maccoby, E.E. (1978). Social behavior at 33 months in same-sex and mixed-sex dyads. Child Development, 49, 557-569.
22. Kashy, D.A., & Kenny, D.A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H.T. Reis & C.M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 451-447). New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Kraemer, H.C., & Jacklin, C.N. (1979). Statistical analysis of dyadic social behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 217-224.
24. Kenny, D.A. (1987). Statistics for the social and behavioral sciences. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Company.
25. Kenny, D.A. (1990). What makes a relationship special? In T.W. Draper & A.C. Marcos (Eds.), Family variables: Conceptualization, measurement, and use (pp. 161-178). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26. Kenny, D.A. (1996). Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279-294.
27. Kenny, D.A., & Cook, W. (1999). Partner effects in relationship research: Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations. Personal Relationships, 6, 433-488.
28. Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Cook, W.L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
29. Kenny, D.A., & La Voie, L. (1984). The social relations model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 142-182). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30. Kenny, D.A., Mohr, C.D., & Levesque, M.J. (2001). A social relations variance partitioning of dyadic behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 128-141.
31. Kenny, D.A., & Winquist, L.A. (2001). The measurement of interpersonal sensitivity: Consideration of design, components, and unit of analysis. In J.A. Hall & F.J. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 265-302). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Landauer, T.K., Carlsmith, J.M., & Lepper, M. (1970). Experimental analysis of the factors determining obedience of fouryear-old children to adult females. Child Development, 41, 601-611.
33. Lollis, S., & Kuczynski, L. (1997). Beyond one hand clapping: Seeing bidirectionality in parent-child relations. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 14, 441-461.
34. Malloy, T.E., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The social relations model: An integrated method for personality research. Journal of Personality, 54, 199-225.
35. Manders, W.A., Cook, W.L., Oud, J.H.L., Scholte, R.H.J., Janssen, J.M.A.M., & de Bruyn, E.E.J. (2007). Level validity of self-report whole family measures. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 605-613.
36. Moos, R.H., & Moos, B.S. (1981). Family environment scale manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
37. Neiderhiser, J., Reiss, D., & Hetherington, E.M. (1997). The non-shared environment in adolescent development (NEAD) project: A longitudinal family study of twins and siblings from adolescence to young adulthood. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 10, 74-83.
38. Olson, D.H., Portner, J., & Lavee, Y. (1985). FACES III. St. Paul, MN: Family Social Science, University of Minnesota.
39. Plomin, R., Asbury, K., & Dunn, J. (2001). Why are children in the same family so different? Nonshared environment a decade later. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry/La Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie, 46(3), 225-233.
40. Plomin, R., & Daniels, D. (1987). Why are children from the same family so different from each other? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10, 1-60.
41. Ross, H., Stein, N., Trabasso, T., Woody, E., & Ross, M. (2005). The quality of family relationships within and across generations: A social relations analysis. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 29(2), 110-119.
42. Rowe, D.C., & Plomin, R. (1981). The importance of non-shared (E1) environmental influences in behavioral development. Developmental Psychology, 17, 517-531.
43. Rusbult, C.E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172-186.
44. Ryder, R.G. (1968). Husband-wife dyads versus married strangers. Family Process, 7, 233-238.
45. Schoppe-Sullivan, S.J., Diener, M.L., Mangelsdorf, S.C., McHale, J.L., Frosch, C.A., & Brown, G.L. (2006). Attachment and sensitivity in family context: The roles of parent and infant gender. Infant and Child Development, 15, 367-385.
46. West, T.V., Popp, D., & Kenny, D.A. (2008). A guide for the estimation of gender and sexual orientation effects in dyadic data: An actor-partner interdependence model approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 321-336.
47. Zajonc, R.B., & Markus, G.B. (1975). Birth order and intellectual development. Psychological Review, 82, 74-88.