Effect of shared decision-making on therapeutic alliance in addiction health care

Patient Preference and Adherence

Volumn 2, Issue , 2008, Pages 277-285

  Joosten, Evelien A G ^a,b   de Weert, G H ^c   Sensky, T ^d   van der Staak, C P F ^e   de Jong, C A J ^a,b  

^a Novadic Kentron   (Netherlands)

^b Nijmegen Institute for Scientist Practitioners in Addiction NISPA   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^d IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Addiction; Helping alliance; Shared decision making; Substance dependence; Therapeutic alliance

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958275161     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1177889X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S4149     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Adams J. R, Drake RE. 2006. Shared decision-making and evidence-based practice. Community Ment Health J, 42:87-105.
2. Alexander L. B, Luborsky L. 1984. The Penn Helping Alliance Scales. In: Greenberg L. S, Pinhof WM, (eds). The psychotherapeutic process:a research handbook. New York: he Guilford Press.
3. Baldwin S. A, Wampold BE, Imel ZE. 2007. Untangling the alliance-outcome correlation:Exploring the relative importance of therapist and patient variability in the alliance. J Consult Clin Psychol, 75:842-52.
4. Bieber C., Müller KG, Blumenstiel K, et al. 2006. Long-term effects of a shared decision-making intervention on physician-patient interaction and outcome in fibromyalgia. A qualitative and quantitative 1 year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns, 63:357-66.
5. Bieber C., Müller KG, Blumenstiel K, et al. 2008. A shared decision-making communication training program for physicians treating fibromyalgia patients: ffects of a randomized controlled trial. J Psychosom Res, 64:13-20.
6. Charles C., Whelan T, Gafni A. 1999. What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? BMJ, 319:780-2.
7. Cohen J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd edition). Hillsdale NJ:Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
8. Compton W. M, Cottler LB, Dorsey KB, et al. 1996. Comparing assessments of DSM-IV substance dependence disorders using CIDI-SAM and SCAN. Drug Alcohol Depend, 41:179-87.
9. Connors G. J, Carroll KM, DiClemente CC, et al. 1997. The therapeutic alliance and its relationship to alcoholism treatment participation and outcome. J Consult Clin Psychol, 65:588-98.
10. Crawford M. J, Aldridge T, Bhui K, et al. 2003. User involvement in the planning and delivery of mental health services: a cross-sectional survey of service users and providers. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 107:410-4.
11. Cronbach L.J. 1990. Essentials of Psychological Testing. New York: Harper and Row.
12. De Jong-Verhagen JG, De Jong CAJ. 2001. Cliënten en behandelingsteam: op een lijn? Een methode voor het inschatten van doelen en verwachtingen van cliënten en behandelingsteam in een beschermende woonvoorziening. (Clients and treatment staff:at the same level? A method to estimate treatment goals and expectations of clients and treatment staff in supported housing). MGv, 56:1057-71.
13. De Weert-Van Oene GH, De Jong CAJ, Jorg F, et al. 1999. The helping Alliance Questionnaire:Psychometric Properties in Patients with substance dependence. Subst Use Misuse, 34:1549-69.
14. Elvins R., Green J. 2008. The conceptualization and measurement of therapeutic alliance:An empirical review. Clin Psychol Review, doi:10.1016/ j.cpr.2008.04.002.
15. Fischer E.P. 2006. Shared decision making and evidence-based practice: A commentary. Community Ment Health J, 42:107-11.
16. Fuertes J. N, Mislowack A, Bennett J, et al. 2007. The physician-patient working alliance. Patient Educ Couns, 66:29-36.
17. Greenson R.R. 1965. The working alliance and the transference neuroses. Psycho-analysis Quarterly, 34:155-81.
18. Hamann J., Leucht S, Kissling W. 2006. Shared decision making for in-patients with schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 114:265-73.
19. Hartgens C., Hendriks V, Van der Meer CW, et al. 1994. De Nederlandse vertaling van de Europese versie van de Addiction Severity Index, 5e editie (Dutch Translation of the European Version of the Addiction Severity Index, 5th ed). Amsterdam:AIAR.
20. Hendriks V. M, Kaplan CD, Van Limbeek J, et al. 1989. The Addiction Severity Index:reliability and validity in a Dutch addict population. J Subst Abuse Treat, 6:133-41.
21. Hougaard E. 1994. The therapeutic alliance-A conceptual analysis. Scan J Psychol, 35:67-85.
22. Hox J. 1998. Multilevel modelling:when and why? In Balderjahn I, Mathar R, Schader M. eds. Classification, data analysis, and data highway. New York: Springer Verlag.
23. Hox J. 2002. Multilevel analysis. Techniques and applications. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associations, Inc.
24. Joosten E. AG, DeFuentes-Merillas L, De Weert GH, et al. 2008. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother Psychosom, 77:219-26.
25. Luborsky L., Barber J, Siqueland L, et al. 1996. The revised Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAq-II). J Psychother Pract Res, 5:260-71.
26. Luborsky L. 1976. Helping alliances in psychotherapy. The groundwork for a study of their relationship to its outcome. In Cleghorn JL, ed. Successful Psychotherapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel. pp. 92-116.
27. McCrone P, Leese M, Thornicroft G, et al. 2000. Reliability of the Camberwell Assessment of Need-European Version. Epsilon study 6. European psychiatric services:inputs linked to outcome domains and needs. Br J Psychiatry, 39; 34-40.
28. McGuire R, McCabe R, Priebe S. 2001. Theoretical frameworks for understanding and investigating the therapeutic relationship in psychiatry. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, 36:557-64.
29. McLellan AT, Luborsky L, Woody GE, et al. 1980. An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients:the addiction severity index. J Nerv Ment Dis, 168:26-33.
30. Meier P. S, Barrowclough C, Donmall MC. 2005. The role of the therapeutic alliance in the treatment of substance misuse:a critical review of the literature. Addiction, 100:304-16.
31. Najavits L. M, Crits-Christoph P, Dierberger A. 2000. Clinicians' impact on the quality of substance use disorder treatment. Subst Use Misuse, 35:2161-90.
32. Phelan M., Slade M, Thornicroft G, et al. 1995. The camberwell assessment of need:the validity and reliability of an instrument to assess the needs of people with severe mental illness. Br J Psychiatry, 167:589-95.
33. Rasbash J., Browne W, Goldstein H, et al. 2000. A user's guide to MlwiN (2nd edition). London:Institute of Education.
34. Robinson A., Thomson R. 2001. Variability in patient preferences for participating in medial decision making:implication for the use of decision support tools. Qual Health Care, 10(Suppl):34-8.
35. Rollnick S., Miller WR. 1995. What is motivational interviewing? Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23:325-34.
36. Sanchez-Craig M. 1990. Brief didactic treatment for alcohol and drugsrelated problems:an approach based on client choice. Addiction, 85:169-77.
37. Van der Weijden T, Van Veenendaal H, Timmermans D. 2007. Shared decision making in the Netherlands-current state and future perspectives. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitätssich, 101:241-6.
38. Varo C. R, Torres Gonzalez F, Luna del Castillo J, et al. 2002. Reliability of the Spanish version of the camberwell assessment of needs. Actas Esp Psiquiatr, 30:99-104.