Outcome measurement in stroke: A scale selection strategy

Stroke

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1787-1794

  Baker, Karen ^a   Cano, Stefan J ^a,b   Playford, E Diane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b PENINSULA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cerebrovascular disorders; outcomes; rehabilitation; scales; upper extremity

Indexed keywords

ABILHAND; ACTION RESEARCH ARM TEST; ARM MOVEMENT; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CHEDOKE ARM AND HAND INVENTORY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FUGL MEYER ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; LIBRARIAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; STROKE; STROKE REHABILITATION ASSESSMENT OF MOVEMENT UPPER LIMB SUBSCALE;

HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79958243929     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: 15244628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.608505     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Leal J, Luengo-Fernández R, Gray A, Petersen S, Rayner M. Economic burden of cardiovascular diseases in the enlarged European Union. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1610-1619. (Pubitemid 43954923)
2. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelstein L, Diels C, Aisen M. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology. 2000;54:1938-1944. (Pubitemid 30327116)
3. Lum PS, Burger CG, Loos MVD, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Yap R. MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: a follow-up study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43:631-642. (Pubitemid 44759900)
4. Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Zajicek JP, Thompson AJ. Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: problems, solutions, and recommendations. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:1094-1105. (Pubitemid 350116704)
5. Hobart J, Cano S. Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: the role of new psychometric methods. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13:1-177.
6. Hobart J. Rating scales for neurologists. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74(suppl IV):iv22-iv26.
7. Ashford S, Slade M, Malaprade F, Turner-Stokes L. Evaluation of functional measures for the hemiparetic upper limb: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:787-795.
8. Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality of life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:193-205.
9. Food and Drug Administration. Patient reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labelling claims. 2009. Available at: www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceCompliance RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ UCM193282.pdf. Accessed June 2010.
10. Branski RC, Cukier-Blaj S, Pusic A, Cano SJ, Klassen A, Mener D, et al. Measuring quality of life in dysphonic patients: a systematic review of content development in patient-reported outcomes measures. J Voice. 2010;24:193-198.
11. Pusic A, Liu JC, Chen CM, Cano S, Davidge K, Klassen A, et al. A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in head and head cancer surgery. Otalaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;136:525-535. (Pubitemid 46517776)
12. Revicki D. FDA draft guidance and health-outcomes research. Lancet. 2007;369:40-42.
13. Cano S, Hobart J, Hart P, Kolipara L, Schapira A, Cooper J. The International Co-operative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS): an appropriate rating scale for Friedreich's ataxia? Mov Disord. 2005;20: 1585-1591.
14. Cano SJ, Posner HB, Moline ML, Hurt SW, Swartz J, Hsu T, et al. The ADAS-cog in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: psychometric evaluation of the sum and its parts. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81: 1363-1368.
15. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
16. Barak S, Duncan PW. Issues in selecting outcome measures to assess functional recovery after stroke. NeuroRx. 2006;3:4.
17. Salter KL, Teasell RW, Foley NC, Jutai JW. Outcome assessment in randomized controlled trials of stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86:1007-1012. (Pubitemid 350307463)
18. Salter KL, Jutai JW, Teasell RW, Foley NC, Bitensky J, Bayley M. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF activity. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:15-34.
19. Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, Foley NC, Bitensky J, Bayley M. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF participation. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:507-528. (Pubitemid 40716304)
20. Poole JL, Whitney SL. Motor Assessment Scale for stroke patients: concurrent validity and interrater reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69:195-197. (Pubitemid 18091465)
21. Barreca SR, Gowland C, Staford P, Torresin W, Huijbretgs M, Hullenaar SV, et al. Development of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Inventory: item selection. Physiotherapy Canada. 1999;51:209-211.
22. Daley K, Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee, S, Danys L, Cabot R. Verification of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM). Physiotherapy Canada. 1997;49:269-278.
23. Wang CH, Hsieh CL, Dai MH, Chen CH, Lai YF. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the stroke assessment of movement (STREAM) instrument. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34:20-24.
24. Penta M, Tesio L, Arnould C, Zancan A, Thonnard JL. The ABILHAND questionnaire as a measure of manual ability in chronic stroke patients: Rasch-based validation and relationship to upper limb impairment. Stroke. 2001;32:1627-1634. (Pubitemid 32631915)
25. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The poststroke hemiplegic patient: I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13-31.
26. Twitchell TE. The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man. Brain. 1951;74:443-480.
27. Brunnstom S. Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia. Phys Ther. 1966; 46:357-375.
28. Carroll D. A quantitative test of upper extremity function. J Chronic Dis. 1965;18:479-491.
29. Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981; 4:483-492. (Pubitemid 12144660)
30. Guttman L. A basis for scaling qualitative data. Am Sociol Rev. 1944;9: 139-150.
31. Lai SM, Studenski S, Duncan PW, Perera S. Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke. 2002;33: 1840-1844. (Pubitemid 34761072)
32. Duncan PW, Jorgensen HS, Wade DT. Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: a systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke. 2000;31:1429-1438. (Pubitemid 30351269)
33. Duncan PW, Lai SM, Tyler D, Perera S, Reker DM, Studenski S. Evaluation of proxy responses to the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke. 2002; 33:2593-2599. (Pubitemid 35266429)
34. Carod-Artal FJ, Ferreira Coral L, Stieven Trizotto D, Menezes Moreira C. Self-and proxy-report agreement on the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke. 2009;40:3308-3314.