Interpellating patients as users: Patient associations and the project-ness of stem cell research

Science Technology and Human Values

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 573-594

  Langstrup, Henriette ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

engagement; interpellation; patient associations; stem cell research

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958230356     PISSN: 01622439     EISSN: 15528251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0162243910368397     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Althusser, Louis. 1971/2006. Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (notes toward an investigation). In The anthropology of the state, ed. A. Sharma and A. Gupta, 86-111. Malden: Blackwell.
2. Barbot, Janine. 2006. How to build an "active" patient? The work of AIDS associations in France. Social Science and Medicine 62:538-51.
3. Bouchard, Ron A. and Trudo Lemmens. 2008. Privatizing biomedical research - a 'third way'. Nature Biotechnology 26:31-36.
4. Brown, Nik. 2003. Hope against hype-Accountability in biopasts, presents and futures. Science Studies 16:3-21.
5. Brown, Nik and Mike Michael. 2003. A sociology of expectations: Retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 15:3-18.
6. Brown, Phil, Stephen Zavestoski, Sabina McCormick, Brian Mayer, Rachel Morello-Frosch and Rebecca G. Altman. 2004. Embodied health movements: New approaches to social movements in health. Sociology of Health & Illness 26:50-80.
7. Butler, Judith. 1997. The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
8. Callon, Michel. 1986. Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In Power, action, and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? ed. John Law, 196-233. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
9. Callon, Michel. 2003. The increasing involvement of concerned groups in R&D policies: What lessons for public powers? In Science and innovation-Rethinking the rationales for funding and governance, ed. A. Guena, A. J. Salter and W. E. Steinmueller, 30-68. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
10. Callon, Michel. 2005. Disabled persons of all countries, unite! In Making Things Public. Atmospheres of Democracy, ed. B. Latour and P. Weibel, 308-13. Cambridge: MIT Press.
11. Callon, Michel and Vololona Rabeharisoa. 2008. The growing engagement of emergent concerned groups in political and economic life-Lessons from the french association of neuromuscular disease patients. Science, Technology, & Human Values 33:230-61.
12. Epstein, Steven. 1996. Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13. Good, Mary-Jo D. 2001. The biotechnical embrace. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 25:395-410.
14. Haraway, Donna. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan(_Meets_ OncoMouse™. New York: Routledge.
15. Hogg, Christine. 1999. Patients, power & politics: From patients to citizens. London: SAGE.
16. Horst, Maja. 2003. Controversy and collectivity: Articulations of social and natural order in mass-mediated representations of biotechnology. PhD Thesis, Doctoral School on Knowledge and Management, Copenhagen Business School.
17. Horst, Maja. 2007. Public expectations of gene therapy. Scientific futures and their performative effects on scientific citizenship. Science, Technology & Human Values 32:150-71.
18. Huniche, Lotte. 2007. Med livet i hænderne. Kroniske hjertepatienters perspektiver på eksperimentel stamcellebehandling. In Håbets teknologi. Samfundsvidenskabelige perspektiver på stamcelleforskning i Danmark, ed. L. Koch and K. Høyer, 225-50. København: Munksgaard.
19. Landzelius, Kyra. 2006. Introduction: Patient organization movements and new metamorphoses in patienthood. Social Science & Medicine 62:529-537.
20. Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
21. Latour, Bruno. 1988. The Pasteurization of france. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
22. Law, John. 1986. On the methods of long-distance control: Vessels, navigation and the portuguese route to India. In Power, action, and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? ed. John Law. London: Routledge.
23. Law, John. 2000. On the subject of the object: Narrative, technology, and interpellation. Configurations 8:1-29.
24. Law, John. 2002. Aircraft stories. Decentering the object in technoscience. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
25. Law, John and Vicky Singleton. 2000. Performing technology's stories. On social constructivism, performance, and performativity. Technology and Culture 41:765-75.
26. Lévinas, Emmanuel. 1979. Totality and infinity: an essay on exteriority. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
27. Lindvall, Olle and Anders Björklund. 2004. Cell therapy in Parkinson's disease. NeuroRx 1:382-93.
28. Mirowski, Philip and Robert Van Horn. 2005. The contract research organization and the commercialization of scientific research. Social Studies of Science 35:503-48.
29. Mol, Annemarie. 2008. The logic of care. Health and the problem of patient choice. London: Routledge.
30. Moreira, Tiago and Paolo Palladino. 2005. Between truth and hope: on Parkinson's disease, neurotransplantation and the production of the 'self. ' History of the Human Sciences 18:55-82.
31. Novas, Carlos. 2006. The political economy of hope: Patients' organizations, science and biovalue. BioSocieties 1:289-305.
32. Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott and Michael Gibbons. 2001. Re-thinking science knowledge and the public in the age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
33. Oudshoorn, Nelly and Trevor Pinch, eds. 2003. How users matter: The co-construction of users and technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
34. Rabeharisoa, Vololona. 2003. The struggle against neuromuscular disease in France and the emergence of the 'partnership model' of patient organisation. Social Science and Medicine 57:2127-36.
35. Rabeharisoa, Vololona and Michel Callon. 2002. The involvement of patients' associations in research. International Social Science Journal 171:57-65.
36. Rabeharisoa, Vololona and Michel Callon. 2004. Patients and scientists in French muscular dystrophy research. In States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order, ed. S. Jasanoff, 142-60. London: SAGE.
37. Rasmussen, V. 2001. Gå Johnny. http://ryk.dk/artikel/20/282 (accessed August 15, 2008).
38. Stockdale, Alan. 1999. Waiting for the cure: Mapping the social relations of human gene therapy research. Sociology of Health & Illness 21:579-96.
39. Strauss, Amselm. 1988. The articulation of project work: An organizational process. The Sociological Quarterly 29:163-78.
40. The Danish Government. 2003. Nye veje mellem forskning og erhverv-fra tanke til faktura-Regeringens handlingsplan. Ministeriet for Videnskab, Teknologi og Udvikling.
41. Thomson, James A., Joseph Itskovitz-Eldor, Sander S. Shapiro, Michelle A. Waknitz, Jennifer J. Swiergiel, Vivienne S. Marshall, and Jeffrey M. Jones. 1998. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282:1145-47.
42. Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stem_cell_treatments. (accessed August 9, 2010).
43. Wood, Brian. 2000. Patient power? The politics of patients' associations in britain and america. Buckingham: Open University Press.
44. Zizek, Slavoj. 1989. The sublime object of ideology. London and New York: Verso Press.