Free space optics in the czech wireless community: Shedding some light on the role of normativity for user-initiated innovations

Science Technology and Human Values

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 423-450

  Söderberg, Johan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

expertise; governance; inequality; justice; markets economies; other; politics; power; protest

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958191190     PISSN: 01622439     EISSN: 15528251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0162243910368398     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Atton, C. 2004. An alternative Internet. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
2. Baldwin, C., C. Hienerth, and E. Hippel. 2006. How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case study. Research Policy 35:1291-313.
3. Berry, D. 2004. The contestation of code: A preliminary investigation into the discourse of the free/libre and open source movements. Critical Discourse Studies 1:65-89.
4. Chopra, S., and Scott, D. 2007. Decoding liberation: The promise of free and open source software. New York: Routledge.
5. Coleman, G. 2004. The political agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the inadvertent politics of contrast. Anthropological Quarterly 77:507-19.
6. COM. 2009. Progress report on the single European electronic communications market 2007 (14th Report). March 24, 2009.
7. Davis, G., and D. McAdam. 2000. Corporations, classes, and social movements after managerialism. Research in Organizational Behaviour 22:193-236.
8. Downing, J. 2001. Radical media: Rebellious communication and social movements. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
9. Dubet, F., and H. Thaler. 2004. Introduction: The sociology of collective action reconsidered. Current Sociology 52:557-73.
10. Dunbar-Hester, C. 2008. Geeks, meta-Geeks, and gender trouble. Social Studies of Science 38:201-32.
11. Dunbar-Hester, C. 2009. 'Free the spectrum!' Activist encounters with old and new media technology. New Media & Society 11:221-40.
12. Eglash, R., J. Croissant, and G. Chiro. 2004. Appropriating technology: Vernacular science and social power. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
13. Elliot, M., and W. Scacci. 2008. Mobilization of software developers: The free software movement, Information Technology & People 21:4-33.
14. Eyerman, R., and A. Jamison. 1991. Social movements: A cognitive approach. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
15. Faulkner, W. 2007. Nuts and bolts and people-Gender-troubled engineering identities. Social Studies of Science 37:331-56.
16. Flichy, P. 2007. The internet imaginaire. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Franke, N., and S. Shah. 2003. How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy 32:157-78.
18. Hampton, K., and N. Gupta. 2008. Community and social interaction in the wireless city: Wi-fi use in public and semi-public spaces. New Media & Society 10:831-50.
19. Harhoff, D., J. Henkel, and E. von Hippel. 2003. Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Research Policy 32:1753-69.
20. Hess, D. 2005. Technology-and-product-oriented movements: Approximating social movement studies and science and technology studies. Science, Technology, & Human Values 30:515-35.
21. Hess, D., S. Breyman, N. Campbell, and B. Martin. 2008. Science, technology, and social movements. In The handbook of science and technology studies, ed. E. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, and J. Wajcman. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Hienerth, C. 2006. The commercialization of user innovations: The development of the rodeo kayak industry. R & D Management 36:273-94.
23. Horvitz, R. 2008. Marconi's legacy: National sovereignty claims in radio. 1st COM-MUNIA Workshop paper.
24. Håpnes, T., and K. Sörenson. 1995. Competition and collaboration in male shaping of computing: A study of a Norwegian hacker culture. In The gender-technology relation-Contemporary theory and research, ed. K. Grint and R. Gill. London: Taylor & Francis.
25. Jamison, A. 2006. Social movements and science: Cultural appropriations of cognitive praxis. Science as Culture 15:45-59.
26. Juris, J. 2005. The new digital media and activist networking within anti-corporate globalisation movements. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 597:189-208.
27. Kleif, T. 2003. "I'm no athlete [but] I can make this thing dance!"-Men's pleasures in technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values 28:296-325.
28. Lettl, C., C. Herstatt, and H. Gemuenden. 2006. Users' contributions to radical innovation: Evidence from four cases in the field of medical equipment technology. R&D Management 36:251-72.
29. Levy, S. 1984. Hackers: The heroes of the computer revolution. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.
30. Lounsbury, M., M. Ventresca, and P. Hirsch. 2003. Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: A cultural-political perspective on US recycling. Socio-Economic Review 1:71-104.
31. Lüthje, C., C. Herstatt, and E. Hippel. 2005. User-innovators and "local" information: The case of mountain biking. Research Policy 34:951-6.
32. Markoff, J. 2005. What the dormouse said: How the sixties counter-culture shaped the personal computer industry. New York: Viking.
33. McInerney, Paul-Brian. Technology movements and the politics of free/open source software. Science, Technology & Human Values 34:206-233.
34. Morton, S., and J. Podolny. 2002. Love or money? The effects of owner motivation in the California wine industry. Journal of Industrial Economics 50:431-56.
35. Morton, S., and J. Podolny. 2002. Love or money? The effects of owner motivation in the California wine industry. Journal of Industrial Economics 50:431-56.
36. Moody, G. 2002. Rebel code: The inside story of Linux and the open source revolution. New York: Basic Books.
37. O'Mahony, S. 2002. Emergence of a new commercial actor: Community managed software Projects. PhD thesis.
38. O'Mahony, S. 2003. Guarding the commons: How community managed software projects protect their work. Research Policy 32:1179-1198.
39. O'Mahony, S., and B. Bechky. 2008. Boundary organisations: Enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Administrative Science Quarterly 53:422-59.
40. Oost, E., S. Verhaegh, and N. Oudshoorn. 2009. From innovation community to community innovation: User-initiated innovation in wireless Leiden. Science, Technology, & Human Values 34:184.
41. Opel, A. 2004. Micro radio and the FCC: Media activism and the struggle over broadcast policy. Westport, CT: Praeger.
42. Oudshoorn, N., and T. Pinch, eds. 2003. How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Pfaffenberger, B. 1996. If I want it, it's OK. Usenet and the (outer) limits of free speech. The Information Society 12:365-86.
44. Rohracher, H. ed. 2005. User involvement in innovation processes: Strategies and limitations from a socio-technical perspective. Munchen, Germany: Profil Verlag.
45. Shah, S. 2006. Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Science 52:1000-14.
46. Shah, S., and M. Tripsas. 2007. The accidental entrepreneur: The emergent and collective process of user entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 1:123-40.
47. Stallman, R. 1999. On free hardware. Linux Today, June 22.
48. Stallman, R. 2002. Free software, free society: Selected essays of Richard Stallman. Boston MA: Cop.
49. Urban, G., and E. Hippel. 1988. Lead user analyses for the development of new industrial products. Management Science 34:569-82.
50. von Hippel, E. 1988. The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
51. von Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing innovation. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
52. von Hippel, E., and G. von Krogh. 2003. Open source software and the 'privatecollective' innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science 14:209-23.
53. von Hippel, E., and G. von Krogh. 2006. Free revealing and the private-collective model for innovation incentives. R&D Management 36:295-306.
54. West, J., and K. Lakhani. 2008. Getting clear about communities in open innovation. Industry and Innovation 15:223-31.