The intermediate clinical outcome and its limitations of bryan cervical arthroplasty for treatment of cervical disc herniation

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 221-229

  Ren, Xianjun ^a   Wang, Weidong ^a   Chu, Tongwei ^a   Wang, Jian ^a   Li, Changqing ^a   Jiang, Tao ^a  

^a THIRD MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

cervical disc herniation; cervical disc prosthesis; implant; oriental patients

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRYAN CERVICAL DISC PROSTHESIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; MALE; OSSIFICATION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; RADICULAR PAIN; RADICULOPATHY; RANGE OF MOTION; SPINAL CORD DISEASE; SPINE MOBILITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTEBRA BODY;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DISPLACEMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79958185776     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: 15392465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181e9f309     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Pracyk JB, Traynelis VC. Treatment of the painful motion segment. Spine. 2005;30:S23-S32.
2. Phillips FM, Garfin SR. Cervical disc replacement. Spine. 2005;30: S27-S33. (Pubitemid 41292200)
3. Bryan VE Jr. Cervical motion segment replacement. Eur Spine J. 2002;11(suppl 2):92-97.
4. Goffin J, Casey A, Kehr P, et al. Preliminary clonical experience with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Neurosurgery. 2002;51: 840-847. (Pubitemid 36331083)
5. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Devine J, et al. Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16:384-389.
6. Mehren C, Suchomel P, Grochulla F, et al. Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine. 2006;31: 2802-2806. (Pubitemid 44772781)
7. DiAngelo DJ, Roberston JT, Metcalf NH, et al. Biomechanical testing of an artificial cervical joint and an anterior cervical plate. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16:314-323.
8. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, et al. Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine. 2002;27:2431-2434. (Pubitemid 35346149)
9. Baba H, Furusawa N, Imura S, et al. Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spindylotic myeloradiculopathy. Spine. 1993;18:2167-2173. (Pubitemid 23336048)
10. Kulkarni V, Rajshekhar V, Raghuram L. Accelerated spondylotic changes adjacent to the fused segment following central cervical corpectomy: magnetic resonance imaging study evidence. J Neuro-surg. 2004;100(1 suppl Spine):2-6. (Pubitemid 38010001)
11. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, et al. Radiculopathy and mylopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:519-528. (Pubitemid 29211592)
12. Ren X, Wang W, Wang M, et al. Cervical arthroplasty in the management of cervical disc herniation. Orthopedic J China. 2006; 14:1766-1768.
13. Yang S, Wu X, Hu Y, et al. Early and intermediate follow-up results after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: single-and multiple. Spine. 2008;33: 371-377.
14. Yoon DH, Yi S, Shin HC, et al. Clinical and radiogical results following cervical arthroplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006;149: 943-950. (Pubitemid 44338610)
15. Lind B, Zoega B, Anderson PA. A radiostereometric analysis of the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Spine. 2007;32:885-890. (Pubitemid 46624307)
16. Parkinson JF, Sekhon LH. Cervical arthroplasty complicated by delayed spontaneous fusion. case report. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2: 377-380.
17. Bartels RHMA, Donk R. Fusion around cervical disc prosthesis: case report. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:194. (Pubitemid 40944194)
18. Pickett GE, Sekhon LH, Sears WR, et al. Complication with cervical arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;4:98-105.
19. Leung C, Casey AT, Goffin J, et al. Clinical significance of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc replacement: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:759-763.
20. Heidecke V, Burkert W, Brucke M, et al. Intervertebral disc replacement for cervical degenerative disease-clinical results and functional outcome two years in patients implanted with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Acta Neurochir (Wein). 2008;150:453-459.
21. Tan SH, Teo EC, Chua HC, et al. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of cervical, thoracic and lumbar vertebrae of Chinese Singaporeans. Eur Spine J. 2004;13:137-146. (Pubitemid 38469769)
22. Kim MK, Kwak DS, Park CK, et al. Quantitative anatomy of the endplate of the middle and lower cervical vertebrae in Koreans. Spine. 2007;32:374-381.
23. Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, et al. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients. Spine. 2007;32:2933-2940. (Pubitemid 350307273)