Quantitative anatomy of the endplate of the middle and lower cervical vertebrae in koreans

Spine

Volumn 32, Issue 14, 2007, Pages

  Kim, Moon Kyu ^a   Kwak, Dai Soon ^b   Park, Chun Kun ^c   Park, Se Hyuck ^a   Oh, Sae Moon ^a   Lee, Sang Won ^c   Han, Seung Ho ^b  

^a Hallym University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Anatomy; Cervical vertebra; Endplate; Koreans

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; CADAVER; CERVICAL SPINE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; JOINT; KOREA; MALE; NERVE ENDING; PARAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX RATIO;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CADAVER; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KOREA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; REFERENCE VALUES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34250728102     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318067e384     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Albert TJ, Eichenbaum MD. Goals of cervical disc replacement. Spine J 2004;4(suppl):292-3.
2. Durbhakula MM, Ghiselli G. Cervical total disc replacement: I. Rationale, biomechanics, and implant types. Orthop Clin North Am 2005;36:349-54.
3. Ishihara H, Kanamori M, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical interbody fusion. Spine J 2004;4:624-8.
4. Le H, Thongtrangan I, Kim DH. Historical review of cervical arthroplasty. Neurosurg Focus 2004;17:E1.
5. McAfee PC. The indications for lumbar and cervical disc replacement. Spine J 2004;4(suppl):177-81.
6. Panjabi MM, Duranceau J, Goel V, et al. Cervical human vertebrae: quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of the middle and lower regions. Spine 1991;16:861-9.
7. Tan SH, Teo EC, Chua HC. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of cervical, thoracic and lumbar vertebrae of Chinese Singaporeans. Eur Spine J 2004;13:137-46.
8. Fang D, Cheung KM, Ruan D, et al. Computed tomographic osteometry of the Asian lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord 1994;7:307-16.
9. Gilad I, Nissan M. Sagittal evaluation of elemental geometrical dimensions of human vertebrae. J Anat 1985;143:115-20.
10. Gilad I, Nissan M. Sagittal radiographic measurements of the cervical and lumbar vertebrae in normal adults. Br J Radiol 1985;58:1031-4.
11. Gilad I, Nissan M. A study of vertebra and disc geometric relations of the human cervical and lumbar spine. Spine 1986;11:154-7.
12. Nissan M, Gilad I. The cervical and lumbar vertebrae: an anthropometric model. Eng Med 1984;13:111-4.
13. Zhou SH, McCarthy ID, McGregor AH, et al. Geometrical dimensions of the lower lumbar vertebrae: analysis of data from digitised CT images. Eur Spine J 2000;9:242-8.
14. Panjabi MM, Takata K, Goel V, et al. Thoracic human vertebrae: quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 1991;16:888-901.
15. Kim I, Paik KS, Lee SP. Quantitative evaluation of the accuracy of microcomputed tomography in tooth measurement. Clin Anat 2007;20:37-34.
16. Francis CC. Dimensions of the cervical vertebrae. Anat Rec 1955;122:603-9.
17. Cho H-L, Kim M-K, Kim D-H, et al. The kinetics of cervical spine after Bryan artificial disc replacement. Korean J Spine 2005;2:213-23.