Towards a feminist HCI methodology: Social science, feminism, and HCI

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 675-684

  Bardzell, Shaowen ^a   Bardzell, Jeffrey ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Design; Feminism; Feminist HCI; Methodology; Philosophy of science; Post positivism; Theory; User research

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; SOCIAL ASPECTS; UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING;

FEMINISM; FEMINIST HCI; HCI METHODOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE; POST-POSITIVISM; SOCIAL CHANGES; SUSTAINABLE INTERACTIONS; THEORY; USER RESEARCH;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 79958174981     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1978942.1979041     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (60)

1. Alcoff, L. and Potter, E. Feminist Epistemologies. Routledge, 1992.
2. Bardzell, J. Interaction criticism and aesthetics. Proc. of CHI'09, ACM Press (2009), 2357-2366.
3. Bardzell, S. Feminist HCI: Taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. Proc. of CHI'10, ACM Press (2010), 1301-1310.
4. Bardzell, S., Bardzell, J., Pace, T. Understanding affective interaction: Emotion, engagement, and Internet videos. Proc. of 2009 IEEE International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction. IEEE, 1-8.
5. Bjerknes, G., Ehn, P., and Kyng, M. Computers and Democracy: A Scandavian Challenge, Avebury, 1987.
6. Blevis, E. Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse. Proc. of CHI'07, ACM Press (2007), 503-512. (Pubitemid 47581638)
7. Boehner, K., Vertesi, J., Sengers, P., Dourish, P. How HCI interprets the probes. In Proc. of CHI'07. NY: ACM Press. 1077-1086.
8. Bell, G, and Dourish, P. Yesterday's tomorrows: Notes on ubiquitous computing's dominant vision. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (2006).
9. Blythe, M. Pastiche scenarios. Interactions. ACM Press (2004), 51-53.
10. Bødker, S. Creating conditions for participation: Conflicts and resources in system development. Human Computer Interaction 11, 3 (1996), 215-236. (Pubitemid 126706068)
11. Cancian, F. Feminist science: Methodologies that challenge inequality. Gender & Society 6, 1 (1992), 623-642.
12. Card, S., Moran, T., and Newell, A. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 1983.
13. Cook, J. and Fonow, M. Knowledge and women's interests: Issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist sociological research. Sociological Inquiry 56 (1986), 2-29.
14. DiSalvo, C., Brynjarsdóttir, B., and Sengers, P. Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI. Proc. of CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010).
15. DiSalvo, C. Design and the construction of publics. Design Issues 25, 1 (2009), 48-63.
16. Dourish, P. Where the Action is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, 2006.
17. Dourish, P. Implications for design. Proc. CHI'06. NY: ACM Press, 541-550.
18. Dourish, P., Finlay, J., Sengers, P., & Wright, P. Reflective HCI: Towards a critical technical practice. In CHI'04 Extended Abstracts. ACM Press (2004), 1727-1728.
19. Fry, T. New design philosophy: An Introduction to De-futuring. University of New South Wales Press, 1999.
20. Gaver, W., Dunne, T., and Pacenti, E. Cultural probes. Interactions, (1996), 21-29.
21. Grosz, E. What is feminist theory? In Payne, C. and Grosz, E. (eds.). Feminist Challenges: Social and Political Theory. Northeaster UP, 1986, 190-204.
22. Hanmer, J., and Sanders, S. Well-Founded Fear: A Community Study of Violence to Women. Hutchinson, 1984.
23. Harding, S. The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. Routledge, 2004.
24. Harding, S. Is Science Multicultural?: Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Indiana University Press, 1998
25. Harding, S. Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is "strong objectivity"? In Alcoff, L, and Potter, E. (eds.). Feminist Epistemologies. Routledge, 1992.
26. Harding, S. Feminism and Methodology. Indiana University Press, 1987.
27. Harper, R., Randall, D., Smythe, N., Evans, C., Heledd, L., and Moore, R. Thanks for the memory. In Proc. of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on HCI 2007. British Computer Society, (2007), 39-42.
28. Haraway, D., J. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Free Association Books, London, 1991.
29. Hartsock, N. The feminist standpoint. In S. Harding and M. B. Hintikka (eds). Discovering Reality. D. Riedel Publishing Company, Holland, Boston, London, 1983, 283-310
30. rd ed. Prometheus Books, 1998.
31. Irani, L., Vertesi, J., Dourish, P., Philip, K., and Grinter, R. Postcolonial computing: A lens on design and development. Proc. of CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1311-1320.
32. John, B. Information processing and skilled behavior. In Carroll, J. (ed.). HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks. Morgan Kaufmann, 2003.
33. Kincaid, H. Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences: Analyzing Controversies in Social Research. Cambridge UP, 1996.
34. Kuhn, T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, 1962.
35. Law. E. Preface: Meaningful measures: Valid useful user experience measurement. In Proc. of the International Workshop on Meaningful Measures. (2008), 3-4.
36. Light, A., Kleine, D and Vivent, M. Performing Charlotte: A tool to bridge cultures in participatory design. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development, 2, 1 (2010).
37. Longino, H. Can there be a feminist science? In Wyer, M., Barbercheck, M., Giesman, D., Öztürk, H., and Wayne, M. (eds.). Women, Science, and Technology. Routledge, New York, London, 2001, 216-222.
38. Löwgren, J. and Stolterman, E. Thoughtful Interaction Design. MIT Press, 2004.
39. McCarthy, J. and Wright, P. Technology as Experience. The MIT Press, 2004.
40. McDowell, L. Doing gender: Feminism, feminists, and research methods in human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 17, 4 (1992), 399-416.
41. rd ed. Prometheus Books, 1998.
42. Miller, R. (1998). Three versions of objectivity: aesthetic, moral, and scientific. In Levinson, J. (ed.), Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 26-58.
43. Naples, N. Feminism and Method: Ethnography, Discourse Analysis, and Activist Research. Routledge, 2003.
44. Nelson, L.H. Feminist Philosophy of Science. In Machamer, P. & Silberstein, M. (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science. Blackwell, 2002.
45. Olson, G., and Olson, J. Distance matters. HumanComputer Interaction 15, 1 (2000).
46. Pace, T., Bardzell, S., & Bardzell, J. (2010). The rogue in the lovely black dress: Intimacy in World of Warcraft. Proc. of CHI'10, ACM Press (2010), 233-242.
47. Papanek, V. Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change. Academy Chicago Publishers, 1985.
48. Picard, P. Affective Computing. The MIT Press, 2000.
49. Ramazanoǧlu, C., and Holland, J. Feminist Methodology: Challenges and Choices. Sage, 2002.
50. Reinharz, S. Feminist Methods in Social Research. Oxford UP, 1992.
51. Rogers, Y. Moving on from Weiser's vision of calm computing: Engaging ubicomp experiences. Ubicomp 2006, LNCS 4206 (2006), 404-421. (Pubitemid 44641569)
52. rd ed. Prometheus Books, 1998.
53. Sengers P, Boehner K, David S, Kaye J. Reflective design. CC '05. ACM Press, New York (2005), 49-58.
54. Sengers, P., McCarthy, J. & Dourish, P. (2006). Reflective HCI: articulating an agenda for critical practice. Extended Abstracts, CHI '06, ACM Press, New York, NY, 1683-1686.
55. Sprague, J. Feminist Methodologies for Critical Researchers: Bridging Differences. AltaMira Press, 2005.
56. Sprague, J., and Zimmerman, M. Quality and quantity: Reconstructing feminist methodology. In The American Sociologist, 20, 1 (1989), 71-86.
57. Star, S.L. Misplaced concretism and concrete situations: Feminism, method, and information technology. Gender-Nature-Culture feminist Research Network, working paper 11, (1994), Odense, Denmark.
58. Stroll, A. Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy. Columbia University Press, 2000.
59. Wright, P. and McCarthy, J. Empathy and experience in HCI. In Proc. of CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008).
60. Zachry, M. An interview with Susan Leigh Star. Technical Communication Quarterly 17, 4 (2008), 435-454.