Kineticons: Using iconographic motion in graphical user interface design

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1999-2008

  Harrison, Chris ^a   Hsieh, Gary ^b   Willis, Karl D D ^c   Forlizzi, Jodi ^a   Hudson, Scott E ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University ^*  (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Animation; GUI; Icons; Kinetic; Look and feel

Indexed keywords

KINETICS;

ANIMATED GRAPHIC; APPLICATION SYSTEMS; GEOMETRIC MANIPULATION; GRAPHICAL ELEMENTS; GRAPHICAL ICONS; ICON; LOOK AND FEEL; NEW APPLICATIONS; NEW DEVICES; USER INTERFACE DESIGNS;

GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES;

EID: 79958162422     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1978942.1979232     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Agarawala, A. and Balakrishnan, R. Keepin' it real: pushing the desktop metaphor with physics, piles and the pen. In Proc. CHI '06. 1283-1292.
2. Baecker, R., Small, I. (1990). Animation at the interface. In: B. Laurel (Ed.) The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
3. Baecker, R., Small, I., and Mander, R. Bringing icons to life. In Proc. CHI '91. 1-6.
4. Barclay, C.D., Cutting, J.W., and Kozlowski, L.T. Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition. Perception and Psychophysics 23, 1978, 145-152. (Pubitemid 9167554)
5. Bartram, L. Perceptual and interpretative properties of motion for information visualization. In Proc. NPIV '97. 3-7.
6. Baudisch, P., Tan, D., Collomb, M., Robbins, D., Hinckley, K., Agrawala, M., Zhao, S., and Ramos, G. Phosphor: Explaining Transitions in the User Interface Using Afterglow Effects. In Proc. UIST'06.169-178.
7. Baumann, K. and Thomas, B. (2001). User Interface Design of Electronic Appliances, 1st Ed. CRC Press.
8. Beaudouin-Lafon, M. and Conversy, S. Auditory illusions for audio feedback. In Proc CHI '96 Companion. 299-300.
9. Blattner, M.M., Sumikawa, D.A., and Greenberg, R.M. Earcons and icons: their structure and common design principles. Hum.-Comp. Interac. 4, 1 (1989), 11-44.
10. Bodner, R.C. and MacKenzie, I.S. Using animated icons to present complex tasks. In Proc. Conf. Centre For Adv. Stud. Collab. Res. IBM Press. 1-11
11. Brewster, S. and Brown, L.M. Tactons: structured tactile messages for non-visual information display. In Proc. Australasian User interface '04. 15-23.
12. Brewster, S.A., Wright, P.C. and Edwards, A. An evaluation of earcons for use in auditory human-computer interfaces. In Proc. CHI '93. 222-227
13. Chang, B. and Ungar, D. Animation: from cartoons to the user interface. In Proc. UIST '93. 45-55.
14. Chatty, S. Defining the dynamic behaviour of animated interfaces. In Proc. IFIP TC2/WG2.7 '92. 95-111.
15. Conversy, S. Wind and wave auditory icons for monitoring continuous processes. In Proc. CHI '98. 351-352.
16. Easterby, R. The Perception of Symbols for Machine Displays. Ergonomics 13, 1 (1970), 149-158.
17. Enriquez, M.J. and MacLean, K.E. The Hapticon Editor: A Tool in Support of Haptic Communication Research. In Proc. HAPTICS '03. 356-362.
18. Findlater, L., Moffatt, K., McGrenere, J., and Dawson, J. Ephemeral adaptation: the use of gradual onset to improve menu selection performance. In Proc. CHI '09. 1655-1664.
19. Gaver, W. Auditory Icons: Using Sound in Compute Interfaces. Hum.-Comp. Interac. 2, 2 (1986), 167-177. (Pubitemid 17511730)
20. Gaver, W. The Sonic Finder: An Interface that Uses Auditory Icons. Hum.-Comp Interac, 4, 1 (1989), 67-94.
21. Gonzalez, C. Does animation in user interfaces improve decision making? In Proc. CHI '96. 27-34.
22. Hankinson, J.C. and Edwards, A.D. Designing earcons with musical grammars. SIGCAPH Comput. Phys. Handicap. 65 (Sep. 1999), 16-20.
23. Harrison, C. and Hudson, S.E. Texture displays: a passive approach to tactile presentation. In Proc. CHI '09. 2261-2264.
24. Jacob, R.J., Girouard, A., Hirshfield, L.M., Horn, M.S., Shaer, O., Solovey, E.T., and Zigelbaum, J. Reality-based interaction: a framework for post-WIMP interfaces. Proc. CHI '08. 201-210.
25. Johansson, G. Visual Motion Perception. Scientific American, 232 (1975). 76-88.
26. Kendon, A. (1988). How Gestures Can Become Like Words. In Cross-cultural Perspectives in Nonverbal Communication. Toronto, C.J. Hogrefe, 131-141.
27. Kolers, P. A. (1972). Aspects of Motion Perception. Pergamon Press Inc., New York.
28. Kosugi, D. and Fujita, K. How do 8-month-old infants recognize causality in object motion and that in human action. Japanese Psychol. Research, 44 (2002), 66-72.
29. Lasseter, J. Principles of traditional animation applied to 3D computer animation. In Proc. SIGGRAPH '87. 35-44.
30. Lee, J.C., Forlizzi, J., and Hudson, S.E. The kinetic typography engine: an extensible system for animating expressive text. In Proc. UIST '02. 81-90.
31. Lee, S.H., and Blake, R. Visual form created solely from temporal structure. Science, 284 (1999). 1165-1168. (Pubitemid 29288405)
32. Liang, J., Huang, M.J. Highlighting in Information Visualization: A Survey. In Proc. IV '10. 79-85.
33. Lodding, K. Iconic Interfacing. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 3, 2 (1983), 11-20.
34. McCloud, S. (1993). Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. Kitchen Sink Press, Inc., Northampton, MA.
35. McCrickard, D., Zhao Q. and Stasko, J. Exploring Animation as a Presentation Technique for Dynamic Information Sources. In GVU Technical Report, GITGVU-99-47, 1999.
36. Mulder, A. (1996). Hand Gestures for HCI. School of Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Technical Report 96-1.
37. Myers, B.A. The importance of percent-done progress indicators for computer-human interfaces. SIGCHI Bull. 16, 4 (Apr. 1985), 11-17.
38. Neri, P. Moroone, M.C. and Burr, D.C. Seeing Biological Motion. Nature, 395 (1998), 894-896. (Pubitemid 28503429)
39. Pelphrey, K.A., Mitchell, T.V., McKeown, M.J., Goldstein, J., Allison, T., and McCarthy, G. Brain activity evoked by the perception of human walking: Controlling for meaningful coherent motion. Jour. Neuroscience, 23 (2003), 6819-6825. (Pubitemid 36951210)
40. Pylyshyn, Z., Burkell, J., Fisher, B., Sears, C., Schmidt, W. and Trick, L. Multiple parallel accessing visual attention. Canadian Journal of Exper. Psychology, 48, 2 (1994), 260-283.
41. Shanmugasundaram, M., Irani, P., Gutwin, C. Can smooth view transitions facilitate perceptual constancy in node-link diagrams? In Proc. GI '07. 71-78.
42. Stasko, J.T. (1993). Animation in user interfaces: principles and techniques. In User Interface Software. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. 81-101.
43. Thomas, B. H. and Calder, P. Supporting cartoon animation techniques in direct manipulation graphical user interfaces. Inf. Softw. Technol. 47, 5 (2005), 339-355. (Pubitemid 40319705)
44. Thomas, B.H. and Calder, P. Applying cartoon animation techniques to graphical user interfaces. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 8, 3 (2001), 198-222.
45. Thomas, F. and Johnston, O. (1984). Disney Animation: The Illusion of Life. Abbeville Press, New York, NY.
46. Wilson, A.D., Izadi, S., Hilliges, O., Garcia-Mendoza, A., and Kirk, D. Bringing physics to the surface. Proc. UIST '08. 67-76.
47. Wolfe, J.M., Kluender, K.R., Levi, D.M., Bartoshuk, L.M, Herz, R.S., Klatzky, R.L., and Lederman, S.J. (2006). Sensation and Perception. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.