Pathway analysis of high-throughput biological data within a bayesian network framework

Bioinformatics

Volumn 27, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1667-1674

  Isci, Senol ^a   Ozturk, Cengizhan ^a   Jones, Jon ^b   Otu, Hasan H ^c,d  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c ISTANBUL BILGI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^d HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; HUMAN; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; KIDNEY TUMOR; METABOLISM;

ALGORITHMS; BAYES THEOREM; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SOFTWARE;

EID: 79958155496     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr269     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alexa, A. et al. (2006) Improved scoring of functional groups from gene expression data by decorrelating GO graph structure. Bioinformatics, 22, 1600-1607.
2. Bauer, S. et al. (2010) GOing Bayesian: model-based gene set analysis of genome-scale data. Nucleic Acids Res., 38, 3523-3532.
3. Beinlich, I.A. et al. (1989) The ALARM monitoring system: a case study with two probabilistic inference techniques for belief networks. In Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Springer, Berlin, pp. 247-256.
4. Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B, 57, 289-300.
5. Bolen, K. (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 80-117.
6. Brown, J.K. (1994) Bootstrap hypothesis tests for evolutionary trees and other dendrograms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 12293-12297.
7. Brugarolas, J. (2007) Renal-cell carcinoma-molecular pathways and therapies. N. Engl. J. Med., 356, 185-187.
8. Creighton, C. et al. (2003) Gene expression patterns define pathways correlated with loss of differentiation in lung adenocarcinomas. FEBS Lett., 540, 167-170.
9. Davison, A.C. and Hinkley, D.V. (1997) Bootstrap Methods and their Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
10. Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 57. Chapman & Hall, New York.
11. Friedman, N. et al. (2000) Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression data. J. Comput. Biol., 7, 601-620.
12. Friedman, N. and Nachman, I. (2000) Gaussian process networks. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-00). Morgan Kaufmann, Stanford, CA, pp. 211-219.
13. Furge, K.A. et al. (2007) Detection of DNA copy number changes and oncogenic signaling abnormalities from gene expression data reveals MYC activation in high-grade papillary renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Res., 67, 3171-3176.
14. Gatti, D.M. et al. (2010) Heading down the wrong pathway: on the influence of correlation within gene sets, BMC Genomics, 11, 574.
15. Goeman, J.J. et al. (2004) A global test for groups of genes: testing association with a clinical outcome. Bioinformatics, 20, 93-99.
16. Gumz, M.L. et al. (2007) Secreted frizzled-related protein 1 loss contributes to tumor phenotype of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res., 13, 4740-4749.
17. Heckerman, D. et al. (1995) Learning Bayesian networks: the combination of knowledge and statistical data. Mach. Learn., 20, 197-243.
18. Hoaglin, D.C. et al. (2000) Understanding Robust and Exploratory Data Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 339-400.
19. Hosack, D.A. et al. (2003) Identifying biological themes within lists of genes with EASE. Genome Biol., 4, R70.
20. Imoto, S. et al. (2002) Estimation of genetic networks and functional structures between genes by using Bayesian networks and nonparametric regression. Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 7, 175-186.
21. Jones, J. et al. (2005) Gene signatures of progression and metastasis in renal cell cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., 11, 5730-5739.
22. Jones, J. et al. (2008) Proteomic identification of interleukin-2 therapy response in metastatic renal cell cancer. J. Urol., 179, 730-736.
23. Kanehisa, M. et al. (2008) KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Res., 36, D480-D484.
24. Koeman, J.M. et al. (2008) Somatic pairing of chromosome 19 in renal oncocytoma is associated with deregulated EGLN2-mediated [corrected] oxygen-sensing response. PLoS Genet., 4, e1000176.
25. Kort, E.J. et al. (2008) The E2F3-Oncomir-1 axis is activated in Wilms' tumor. Cancer Res., 68, 4034-4038.
26. Lauritzen, S.L. and Spiegelhalter, D.J. (1988) Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application on expert systems. J. R. Stat. Soc., 50, 157-224.
27. Lenburg, M.E. et al. (2003) Previously unidentified changes in renal cell carcinoma gene expression identified by parametric analysis of microarray data. BMC Cancer, 3, 31.
28. Liu, Q. et al. (2007) Comparative evaluation of gene-set analysis methods. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 431.
29. Lu, Y. et al. (2008)Aprobabilistic generative model for GO enrichment analysis. Nucleic Acids Res., 36, e109.
30. Mansmann, U. and Meister, R. (2005) Testing differential gene expression in functional groups. Goeman's global test versus an ANCOVAapproach. Methods Inf. Med., 44, 449-453.
31. Mills, E.J. et al. (2009) Metastatic renal cell cancer treatments: an indirect comparison meta-analysis. BMC Cancer, 9, 34.
32. Nam, D. and Kim, S.Y. (2008) Gene-set approach for expression pattern analysis. Brief. Bioinform., 9, 189-197.
33. Neapolitan, R.E. (2004) Learning Bayesian Networks. Prentice Hall, NJ, USA.
34. Pearl, J. (2000) Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
35. Perroud, B. et al. (2006) Pathway analysis of kidney cancer using proteomics and metabolic profiling. Mol. Cancer, 5, 64.
36. Romero, P. et al. (2005) Computational prediction of human metabolic pathways from the complete human genome. Genome Biol., 6, R2.
37. Schaefer, C.F. et al. (2009) PID: the pathway interaction database. Nucleic Acids Res., 37, D674-D679.
38. Scheines, R. (1998) The TETRAD project: constraint based aids to causal model specification. Multivariate Behavioral Res., 33, 65-117.
39. Spirtes, P. (1995) Directed cyclic graphical representations of feedback models. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-95). Morgan Kaufmann, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, pp. 491-549.
40. Subramanian, A. et al. (2007) GSEA-P: a desktop application for gene set enrichment analysis. Bioinformatics, 23, 3251-3253.
41. Subramanian, A. et al. (2005) Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 15545-15550.
42. Tarjan, R. (1972) Depth-first search and linear graph algorithms. SIAM J. Comput., 1, 146-160.
43. Van den Bulcke, T. et al. (2006) SynTReN: a generator of synthetic gene expression data for design and analysis of structure learning algorithms. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 43.
44. Vastrik, I. et al. (2007) Reactome: a knowledge base of biologic pathways and processes. Genome Biol., 8, R39.
45. Wang, Y. et al. (2009) Regulation of endocytosis via the oxygen-sensing pathway, Nat. Med., 15, 319-324.
46. Yang, X.J. et al. (2005) A molecular classification of papillary renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Res., 65, 5628-5637.