Detection and severity classifications of sarbanes-oxley section 404 internal control deficiencies

Accounting Review

Volumn 86, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 825-855

  Bedard, Jean C ^a   Graham, Lynford ^a  

^a BENTLEY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Internal controls; Materiality; Risk assessment; Sarbanes Oxley Section 404

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958145395     PISSN: 00014826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/accr.00000036     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Allen, R., D. Hermanson, T. Kozloski, and R. Ramsay. 2006. Auditor risk assessment: Insights from the academic literature. Accounting Horizons 20 (2): 157-177. (Pubitemid 44846499)
2. Amer, T., K. Hackenbrack, and M. Nelson. 1994. Between-auditor differences in the interpretation of probability phrases. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 13 (1): 126-136.
3. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1988. The Auditor's Consideration of Internal Control Structure in the Financial Statement Audit. SAS No. 55. New York, NY: AICPA.
4. Amer, T., K. Hackenbrack, and M. Nelson.1997. Consideration of Internal Control in a Financial Statement Audit: An Amendment to Statement on Auditing Standards No. 55. SAS No. 78. New York, NY: AICPA.
5. Asare, S., and A. Wright. 2008. Equity analysts' reactions to type of control deficiency and likelihood threshold in adverse control reports. Working paper, University of Florida.
6. Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., D. Collins, and W. Kinney. 2007. Discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated audits. Journal of Accounting and Economics 44 (1-2): 166-192.
7. Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., D. Collins, and W. Kinney., D. Collins, W. Kinney, and R. LaFond. 2008. The effect of SOX internal control deficiencies and their remediation on accrual quality. The Accounting Review 83 (1): 217-250.
8. BDO Seidman LLP, Crowe Chizek & Company LLC, Deloitte & Touche LLP, Ernst & Young LLP, Grant Thornton LLP, Harbinger PLC, KPMG LLP, McGladrey & Pullen LLP, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, and W Messier. 2004. A Framework for Evaluating Deficiencies and Exceptions. Version 3, December 20. New York, NY: BDO Seidman LLP et al.
9. Bedard, J., R. Hoitash, and U. Hoitash. 2007. Audit pricing and internal control disclosures among nonaccelerated filers. Research in Accounting Regulation 20: 103-126.
10. Cohen, J., and D. Hanno. 2000. Auditors' consideration of corporate governance and management control philosophy in preplanning and planning judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 19 (2): 133-146.
11. Cohen, J., and D. Hanno. G. Krishnamoorthy, and A. Wright. 2002. Corporate governance and the audit process. Contemporary Accounting Research 19 (4): 573-594.
12. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO). 2006. Internal Control over Financial Reporting- Guidance for Smaller Public Companies. New York, NY: AICPA.
13. Curtis, M., D. Deis, G. Jenkins, and J. Bedard. 2009. Information systems and the financial statement auditor: A research synthesis. Journal of Information Systems 23 (1): 79-96.
14. DeZoort, T, D. Hermanson, and R. Houston. 2003. Audit committee support for auditors: The effects of materiality justification and accounting precision. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22 (2): 175-199. (Pubitemid 36316508)
15. Doyle, J., W. Ge, and S. McVay. 2007. Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 44 (1-2): 193-223.
16. Earley, C, V. Hoffman, and J. Joe. 2008. Reducing management's influence on auditors' judgments: An experimental investigation of SOX 404 assessments. The Accounting Review 83 (6): 1461-1485.
17. Elder, R. A., and R. D. Allen. 2003. A longitudinal field investigation of auditor risk assessments and sample size decisions. The Accounting Review 78 (4): 983-1002. (Pubitemid 37395649)
18. Felix, W, A. Gramling, and M. Maletta. 2001. The contribution of internal audit as a determinant of external audit fees and factors influencing this contribution. Journal of Accounting Research 39 (3): 513-534. (Pubitemid 33592232)
19. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). 1975. Accounting for Contingencies. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5. Stamford, CT: FASB.
20. Hammersley, J., L. Myers, and C. Shakespeare. 2008. Market reactions to internal control weakness disclosures and to the characteristics of those weaknesses under section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Review of Accounting Studies 13 (1): 141-165.
21. Hermanson, D., and Z. Ye. 2009. Why do some accelerated filers with SOX Section 404 material weaknesses provide early warning under Section 302? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 28 (2): 247-271.
22. Hoitash, R., U. Hoitash, and J. Bedard. 2008. Audit fees and internal control problems disclosed under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 27 (1): 105-126.
23. Hoitash, U., R. Hoitash, and J. Bedard. 2009. Corporate governance and internal control quality: A comparison of regulatory regimes. The Accounting Review 84 (3): 839-867.
24. IT Governance Institute. 2004. IT Control Objectives for Sarbanes-Oxley: The Importance of IT in the Design, Implementation and Sustainability of Internal Control over Disclosure and Financial Reporting. Chicago, IL: IT Governance Institute.
25. Kennedy, J., D. Kleinmuntz, and M. Peecher. 1997. Determinants of the justifiability of performance in ill-structured audit tasks. Journal of Accounting Research 35 (Supplement): 105-123. (Pubitemid 127695268)
26. Kinney, W.R., and M. Shepardson. 2010. Do control effectiveness disclosures require internal control audits: A natural experiment with small U.S. public companies. Forthcoming. Journal of Accounting Research.
27. Krishnan, J., D. Rama, and Y. Zhang. 2008. Costs to comply with SOX Section 404. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 27 (1): 169-186.
28. Larcker, D. F., and T. O. Rusticus. 2010. On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 49 (3): 186-205.
29. Leone, A. 2007. Factors related to internal control disclosure: A discussion of Ashbaugh, Collins and Kinney (2007) and Doyle, Ge, and McVay (2007). Journal of Accounting and Economics 44 (1-2): 224-237.
30. Li, C, L. Sun, and M. Ettredge. 2010. Financial executive qualifications, financial executive turnover, and adverse SOX Section 404 opinions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (1): 93-110.
31. Lin, S., M. Pizzini, M. Vargus, and I. Bardhan. 2011. The role of internal audit function in the disclosure of material weaknesses. The Accounting Review 86 (1).
32. Mayhew, B., W. J. Schatzberg, and G. Sevcik. 2001. The effect of accounting uncertainty and auditor reputation on auditor independence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 20 (2): 49-70.
33. Messier, W., N. Martinov-Bennie, and A. Eilifsen. 2005. A review and integration of empirical research on materiality: Two decades later. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 24 (2): 153-187.
34. Nelson, M., J. Elliott, and R. Tarpley. 2002. Evidence from auditors about managements' and auditors' earnings management decisions. The Accounting Review 77 (Supplement): 175-202. (Pubitemid 36208811)
35. Ng, T, and H.-T. Tan. 2003. Effects of authoritative guidance availability and audit committee effort on auditor's judgments in an auditor-client negotiation context. The Accounting Review 78 (3): 801-818. (Pubitemid 36989980)
36. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2004. An Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction with an Audit of Financial Statements. Auditing Standard No. 2. Washington, D.C.: PCAOB.
37. Ng, T, and H.-T. Tan. 2007. An Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting that is Integrated with an Audit of Financial Statements. Auditing Standard No. 5. Washington, D.C.: PCAOB.
38. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 1999a. Materiality. SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99. Washington, D.C.: SEC.
39. Ng, T, and H.-T. Tan. 1999b. Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements. SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101. Washington, D.C.: SEC.
40. Ng, T, and H.-T. Tan. 2005. Staff statement on management's report on internal control over financial reporting. (May 16). Washington, D.C.: SEC.
41. Ng, T, and H.-T. Tan. 2006. SEC announces next steps for Sarbanes-Oxley implementation. (May 17). Washington, D.C.: SEC.
42. U.S. Congress. 2002. The Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (The Sarbanes-Oxley Act). Public Law No. 107-204, 116 Statute 745 (July 30). Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
43. Ng, T, and H.-T. Tan. 2010. Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Public Law No. 111-203 (July 21). Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
44. Wolfe, C, E. Mauldin, and M. Diaz. 2009. Concede or deny: Do management persuasion tactics affect auditor evaluation of internal control deviations? The Accounting Review 84 (6): 2013-2037.