A review and integration of empirical research on materiality: Two decades later

Auditing

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 153-187

  Messier Jr , William F ^a,b   Martinov Bennie, Nonna ^c   Eilifsen, Aasmund ^b  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Materiality; Materiality bases; Qualitative materiality factors; Quantitative

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645751028     PISSN: 02780380     EISSN: 15587991     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/aud.2005.24.2.153     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Allen, R. D., and R. J. Elder. 2005. A longitudinal examination of auditor error projection decisions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 24 (2): 69-84.
2. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2001. Audit Sampling. Audit Guide. New York, NY: AICPA.
3. _. 2004a. Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards. New York, NY: AICPA.
4. _. 2004b. A Framework for Evaluating Control Exceptions and Deficiencies. Version 3. Available at: http://www.aicpa.org.
5. _. 2005a. Exposure Draft of Eight Proposed Statements on Auditing Standards Related to Risk Assessment. June 15. New York, NY: AICPA.
6. _. 2005b. Letter of Comment on the IAASB 's Exposure Draft, Proposed International Standard on Auditing (ISA) No. 320. Revised: Materiality in the Identification and Evaluation of Mis-statements. May 17. New York, NY: AICPA.
7. Arnold, D. F., Sr., R. A. Bernardi, and P. E. Neidermeyer. 2001. The association between European, materiality estimates and client integrity, national culture, and litigation. International Journal of Accounting 36: 459-483.
8. Bell, T. B., F. O. Marrs, I. Solomon, and H. Thomas. 1997. Auditing Organizations Through a Stra-tegic Lens: The KPMG Business Measurement Approach. KPMG Peat Marwick. Available at: http://www.cba.uiuc.edu/kpmg- uiuc.
9. Bernardi, R. A., and D. F. Arnold, Sr. 1994. The influence of client integrity and competence and auditor characteristics on materiality estimates. Irish Accounting Review 1 (1): 1-23.
10. _, and K. V. Pincus. 1996. The relationship between materiality thresholds and judgments of fraud risk. Managerial Finance 22 (9): 1-15.
11. Berardino, J. F. 2001. Remarks before the Committee on Financial Services of the United States House of Representatives. December 12: 3-4. Washington, D.C.: Government Hearings. Available at: http: //financialservices.house.gov/ media/pdf/12120Ijb.pdf.
12. Big Five Audit Materiality Task Force. 1998. Report of the Big Five Audit Materiality Task Force. New York, NY: AICPA.
13. Blokdijk, H., F. Drieenhuizen, D. A. Simunic, and M. T Stein. 2003. Factors affecting auditors' assessments of planning materiality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22 (2): 297-307.
14. Braun, K. W., and S. Dutta. 1998. Considering multiple materialities for account combinations in audit planning and evaluation. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance (Spring): 151-171.
15. _. 2001. The disposition of audit-detected misstatements: An examination of risk and reward factors and aggregation effects. Contemporary Accounting Research 18 (1): 71-99.
16. Brody, R. G., D. J. Lowe, and K. Pany. 2003. Could $51 million be immaterial when Enron reports income of $105 million? Accounting Horizons 17 (2): 153-160.
17. Carpenter, B. W., and M. W. Dirsmith. 1992. Early debt extinguishment transactions and auditor materiality judgments: A bounded rationality perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17 (8): 709-740.
18. _,_, and P. P. Gupta. 1994. Materiality judgments and audit firm culture: Social behavioral and political perspectives. Accounting, Organizations and Society 19 (4/4): 355-380.
19. Chewning, G., K. Pany, and S. Wheeler. 1989. Auditor reporting decisions involving accounting principle changes: Some evidence on materiality thresholds. Journal of Accounting Research 27 (1): 78-96.
20. _, W. Wheeler, and K. Chan. 1998. Evidence on auditor and investor materiality thresholds resulting from equity-for-debt swaps. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 17 (1): 39-53.
21. Costigan, M. L., and D. T Simon. 1995. Auditor materiality judgment and consistency modifications: Further evidence from SEAS No. 96. Advances in Accounting 13: 207-222.
22. DeZoort, F. T., D. R. Hermanson, and R. W. Houston. 2003. Audit committee support for auditors: The effects of materiality justification and accounting precision. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22: 175-199.
23. Elder, R. J., and R. D. Allen. 1998. An empirical investigation of auditor's decision to project errors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 17 (2): 71-87.
24. Elliott, R. 1983. Unique audit methods: Peat Marwick International. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 2 (2): 1-12.
25. Estes, R., and D. D. Reames. 1988. Effects of personal characteristics on materiality decisions: A multivariate analysis. Accounting & Business Research 18 (72): 291-296.
26. Fesler, R. D., and J. L. Hagler. 1989. Litigation disclosures under SEAS No. 5: A study of actual cases. Accounting Horizons 3 (1): 10-21.
27. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). 1975. Materiality. Discussion Memorandum. Stamford, CT: FASB.
28. _. 1980. Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information. Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 2. Stamford, CT: FASB.
29. Fisher, M. H. 1990. The effects of reporting auditor materiality levels publicly, privately, or not at all in an experimental setting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 9 (Supplement): 184-223.
30. Friedberg, A. H., J. R. Strawser, and J. H. Cassidy. 1989. Factors affecting materiality judgments: A comparison of "Big Eight" accounting firms' materiality views with the results of empirical research. Advances in Accounting 1: 187-201.
31. Frishkoff, P. A., and M. E. Phillips. 1985. Materiality in commercial bank inflation accounting. Advances in Accounting 2: 31-46.
32. Gibbins, M., S. Salterio, and A. Webb. 2001. Evidence about auditor-client management negotiation concerning client's financial reporting. Journal of Accounting Research 39 (3): 535-564.
33. Gleason, C. A., and L. F. Mills. 2002. Materiality and contingent tax liability reporting. The Accounting Review 11 (2): 317-342.
34. Haka, S, L. Friedman, and V Jones. 1986. Functional fixation and interference theory: A theoretical and empirical investigation. The Accounting Review 61 (3): 455-474.
35. Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture's Consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
36. Holstrum, G. L., and W. F. Messier, Jr. 1982. A review and integration of empirical research on materiality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 2 (1): 45-63.
37. Icerman, R. C., and W. A. Hillison. 1991. Disposition of audit-detected errors: Some evidence on evaluative materiality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 10 (1): 22-34.
38. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2004. Materiality in the identification and evaluation of misstatements. Proposed International Standard on Auditing 320 (revised). New York, NY: IAASB.
39. Jennings, M., D. C. Kneer, and P. M. J. Reckers. 1987. A reexamination of the concept of materiality: Views of auditors, users and officers of the court. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 6 (2): 104-115.
40. _, P. M. J. Reckers, and D. C. Kneer. 1991. The auditor's dilemma: The incongruous judicial notion of the auditing profession and actual auditor practice. American Business Law 29 (1): 99-125.
41. Kinney, W. R., Jr. 1986. Audit technology and preferences for auditing standards. Journal of Accounting and Economics 8: 73-89.
42. _, D. Burgstahler, and R. Martin. 2002. Earnings surprise "materiality" as measured by stock returns. Journal of Accounting Research 40 (5): 1297-1329.
43. Krogstad, J. L., R. T. Ettenson, and J. Shanteau. 1984. Context and experience in auditors' materiality judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 4 (1): 54-74.
44. Levitt, A. 1998. The numbers game. Remarks delivered at the NYU Center for Law and Business, New York, NY, September 28.
45. Libby, R., and W. R. Kinney, Jr. 2000. Does mandated audit communication reduce opportunistic corrections to manage earnings to forecast? The Accounting Review 75 (4): 383-404.
46. _, M. W. Nelson, and J. E. Hunton. 2005. Recognition versus disclosure and auditor misstate-ment correction: The case for stock compensation and leases. Working paper, Cornell University.
47. Liu, C-S., and H. F. Mittelstaedt. 2002. Materiality judgments and disclosure of retiree heath care costs under SEAS No. 81. Review of Accounting Studies 1: 405-434.
48. Martinov, N., and P. Roebuck. 1998. The assessment and integration of materiality and inherent risk: An analysis of major firms' audit practices. International Journal of Auditing 2 (2): 103-126.
49. Mayper, A. G. 1982. Consensus of auditors' materiality judgments of internal accounting control weaknesses. Journal of Accounting Research 20 (2): 773-783.
50. _, M. S. Doucet, and C. S. Warren. 1989. Auditors' materiality judgments of internal accounting control weaknesses. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 9 (1): 72-86.
51. Messier, W. F., Jr. 1983. The effect of experience and firm type of materiality/disclosure judgments. Journal of Accounting Research 21 (2): 611-618.
52. _, S. Glover, and D. Prawitt. 2006. Auditing and Assurance Services: A Systematic Approach. Fourth edition. New York, NY: Irwin McGraw-Hill, Inc.
53. Morris, M. H., and W. D. Nichols, and J. W. Pattillo. 1984. Capitalization of interest, materiality judgment divergence and users' information needs. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 11 (4): 547-555.
54. _, and _. 1988. Consistency exceptions: Materiality judgments and audit firm structure. The Accounting Review 63 (2): 237-254.
55. Nelson, M. W., J. A. Elliott, and R. L. Tarpley. 2002. Evidence from auditors about managers' and auditors' earnings management decisions. The Accounting Review 11 (Supplement): 175-211.
56. _, S. D. Smith, and Z-V. Palmrose. 2005. The effect of quantitative materiality approach on auditors' adjustments decisions. The Accounting Review 80 (3): 897-920.
57. Ng, T. B-P., and H-T. Tan. 2003. Effects of authoritative guidance availability and audit committee effectiveness on auditors' judgments in an auditor-client negotiation context. The Accounting Review 78 (3) (July): 801-818.
58. Palmrose, Z-V. 1988. An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. The Accounting Review 63 (1) (January): 55-73.
59. Pany, K., and S. Wheeler. 1989. Auditing: A comparison of various materiality rules of thumb. CPA Journal 59 (6): 62-63.
60. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2004. An Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction with an Audit of Financial Statements. Auditing Standard No. 2. Washington, D.C.: PCAOB.
61. Robinson, C., and L. Fertuck. 1985. Materiality: An Empirical Study of Actual Auditor Decisions. Research Monograph Number 12. Vancouver, British Columbia: The Canadian Certified General Accountants' Research Foundation.
62. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 1999. Materiality. SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99. (August 12). Washington, D.C.: SEC.
63. Steinbart, P. J. 1987. The construction of a rule-based expert system as a method for studying ma-teriality judgments. The Accounting Review 62 (1): 97-116.
64. Tuttle, B., M. Coller, and R. D. Plumlee. 2002. The effect of misstatements on decisions of financial statement users: An experimental investigation auditor materiality thresholds. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 21 (1): 11-27.
65. U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Financial Services. 2002. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Public Law No. 107-204. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
66. Wheeler, S., K. Pany, and E. Chewning. 1993. Inter-firm differences in propensities to modify audit opinions for pre-SAS No. 58 accounting principle changes. Accounting Horizons 1 (3): 46-54.
67. Whittington, R., and L. Margheim. 1993. The effects of risk, materiality, and assertion subjectivity on external auditors' reliance on internal auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 12 (1): 50-64.
68. Windgate, M. L. 1997. An examination of cultural influences on audit environment. Research in Accounting Regulation (International Supplement): 115-127.
69. Wong-On-Wing, B., J. H. Reneau, and S. G. West. 1989. Auditors' perception of management: Determinants and consequences. Accounting, Organizations and Society 14 (5/6): 577-587.
70. Wright, A., and S. Wright. 1997. An examination of factors affecting the decision to waive audit adjustments. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 12 (1): 15-36.
71. Zmijewski, M. E. 1984. Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research 22: 59-82.