Interpretative phenomenological analysis and embodied, active, situated cognition

Theory & Psychology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 318-337

  Larkin, Michael ^a   Eatough, Virginia ^b   Osborn, Mike ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL UNITED HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

consciousness; hermeneutic constructivism; philosophy; scientific progress; social cognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958145092     PISSN: 09593543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0959354310377544     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Anderson, M.L. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence, 149, 91-130.
2. Butt, T.W. (1999). Realism, constructionism and phenomenology. In D. Nightingale & J. Cromby (Eds.), Social constructionist psychology: A critical analysis of theory and practice (pp. 127- 140). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
3. Buytendijk, F.J.J. (1961). Pain (E. O'shiel, Trans.). Westport, CT: Greenwood. (Original work published 1943)
4. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Cromby, J. (2002). Review note. [Review of the book Discourse, by D. Howarth]. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2). Retrieved from www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-02/2-02review-cromby-e.htm
6. Dennett, D. (2003). Who's on first? Heterophenomenology explained. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10, 10-30.
7. Derbyshire, S.W.G. (2004). If we are to understand pain and help our patients, what do we need to do differently? American Pain Society Bulletin, 14, 5-11.
8. Dreyfus, H.L. (1995). Being-in-the-world: A commentary on Heidegger's Being and time, division 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Drummond, J. (2007). Phenomenology: Neither auto- nor hetero- be. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6, 57-74.
10. Eatough, V., & Smith, J.A. (2007). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In C. Willig & W. Stainton Rogers (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research methods in psychology (pp. 179-194). London, UK: Sage.
11. Farrer, C., & Frith C.D. (2002). Experiencing oneself vs. another person as being the cause of an action: The neural correlates of the experience of agency. Neuroimage, 15, 596-603.
12. Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2, 209-230.
13. Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2003). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
14. Gallagher, S. (2003). Phenomenology and experimental design. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(9-10), 85-99.
15. Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16. Gallagher, S. (2007). Simulation trouble. Social Neuroscience, 2, 353-365.
17. Gallagher, S., & Sørenson, J.B. (2006). Experimenting with phenomenology. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 119-134.
18. Gallagher, S., & Varela, F. (2001). Redrawing the map and resetting the time: Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences. In S. Crowell, L. Embree, & S.J. Julian (Eds.), The reach of reflection: Issues for phenomenology's second century. Electronpress. Retrieved from http://pegasus.cc.ucf.edu/~gallaghr/G&V01.pdf
19. Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2007). The phenomenological mind: An introduction to philosophy of mind and cognitive science. London, UK: Routledge.
20. Gergen, K.J. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 309-320.
21. Giorgi, A. (2000). The similarities and differences between descriptive and interpretive methods in scientific phenomenological psychology. In B. Gupta (Ed.), The empirical and the transcendental: A fusion of horizons (pp. 61-76). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
22. Glendinning, S. (2007). In the name of phenomenology. London, UK: Routledge.
23. Hammersley, M. (2003). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: Methods or paradigms? Discourse & Society, 14, 751-781.
24. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. (Original work published 1927)
25. Hurlburt, R.T., & Akhtar, S.A. (2006). The descriptive experience sampling method. Phenomenology and Cognitive Science, 5, 271-301.
26. Husserl, E. (1931). Ideas: A general introduction to pure phenomenology (W.R. Boyce Gibson, Trans.). London, UK: Allen & Unwin. (Original work published 1913)
27. Husserl, E. (1982). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: First book. General introduction to pure phenomenology (F. Kersten, Trans.). London, UK: Kluwer. (Original work published 1913)
28. Ihde, D. (2003). Postphenomenology-Again? Retrieved from http://sts.imv.au.dk/arbejdspapirer/WP3.pdf
29. Kockelmans, J.J. (Ed.). (1987). Phenomenological psychology: The Dutch School. Lancaster, UK: Martinus Nijhoff.
30. Langdridge, D. (2006). Phenomenological psychology: Theory, research and method. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
31. Larkin, M., Watts, S., & Clifton, E. (2006). Giving voice and making sense in interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 102-120.
32. Linschoten, J. (1987). Aspects of the sexual incarnation: An inquiry concerning the meaning of the body in the sexual encounter. In J.J. Kockelmans (Ed.), Phenomenological psychology: The Dutch School (pp. 149-194). Lancaster, UK: Martinus Nijhoff. (Original work published 1953)
33. Lutz, A., Lachaux, J.-P., Martiniere, J., & Varela, F.J. (2002). Guiding the study of brain dynamics using first-person data: Synchrony patterns correlate with on-going conscious states during a simple visual task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 99, 1586-1591.
34. Marbach, E. (1993). Mental representation and consciousness: Towards a phenomenological theory of representation and reference. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
35. McLeod, J. (2000). Qualitative research in counselling and psychotherapy. London, UK: Sage.
36. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London, UK: Routledge. (Original work published 1945)
37. Moran, D. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. London, UK: Routledge.
38. Nightingale, D., & Cromby, J. (1999). Social constructionist psychology: A critical analysis of theory and practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
39. Osborn, M., & Smith, J.A. (1998). The personal experience of chronic benign lower back pain: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. British Journal of Health Psychology, 3, 65-83.
40. Osborn, M., & Smith, J.A. (2006). Living with a body separate from the self. The experience of the body in chronic benign low back pain: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Scandinavian Journal for Caring Sciences, 20, 216-222.
41. Palmer, M., Larkin, M., de Visser, R., & Fadden, G. (2010). Developing an interpretative phenomenological approach to focus group data. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 7, 99-121.
42. Petitmengin, C. (2006). Describing one's subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 5, 229-269.
43. Roy, J.-M., Petitot, J., Pachoud, B., & Varela, F.J. (1999). Beyond the gap. In J.-M. Roy, J. Petitot, B. Pachoud, & F.J. Varela (Eds.), Naturalizing phenomenology (pp. 1-82). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
44. Showalter, E. (1997). Hystories: Hysterical epidemics and modern culture. London, UK: Picador.
45. Shweder, R.A. (2003). Why do men barbecue? Recipes for cultural psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46. Smith, J.A. (1996). Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Psychology, 11, 261-71.
47. Smith, J.A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. London, UK: Sage.
48. Smith, J.A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J.A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to methods (pp. 53-80). London, UK: Sage.
49. Smith, J.A., & Osborn, M. (2007). Pain as an assault on the self: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Psychology and Health, 22, 517-534.
50. Smith, M.J. (1998). Social science in question: Towards a postdisciplinary framework. London, UK: Sage.
51. Spinelli, E. (2000). Creation and being: Existential-phenomenological challenges to psycho-analytic theories of artistic creativity. Journal of the Society for Existential Analysis, 11(1), 2-20.
52. Thompson, E. (2004). Life and mind: From autopoiesis to neurophenomenology. A tribute to Francisco Varela. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3, 381-398.
53. Trevarthen, C., & Aitken, K.J. (2001). Infant intersubjectivity: Research, theory, and clinical applications. Annual Research Review. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 42, 3-48.
54. Van Gelder, T.J. (1999). Wood iron? Husserlian phenomenology meets cognitive science. In J.-M. Roy, J. Petitot, B. Pachoud, & F.J. Varela (Eds.), Naturalizing phenomenology (pp. 245-265). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
55. Van Hezewijk, R., & Stam, H.J. (2008). Idols of the psychologist: Johannes Linschoten and the demise of phenomenological psychology in the Netherlands. History of Psychology, 11, 185-207.
56. Van Langenhove, L. (1995). The theoretical foundations of experimental psychology and its alternatives. In J.A. Smith, R. Harré, & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking psychology (pp. 10-23). London, UK: Sage.
57. Varela, F.J. (1996). Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy to the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3, 330-350.
58. Varela, F.J. (1999). The specious present: The neurophenomenology of time consciousness. In J.-M. Roy, J. Petitot, B. Pachoud, & F.J. Varela (Eds.), Naturalizing phenomenology (pp. 266- 316). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
59. Varela, F.J., Thompson, E., & Rosca, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. Willig, C. (2001). Introducing qualitative research in psychology. London, UK: Sage.
61. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 625-636.