TUIC: Enabling tangible interaction on capacitive multi-touch display

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 2995-3004

  Yu, Neng Hao ^b   Chan, Li Wei ^b   Lau, Seng Yong ^a   Tsai, Sung Sheng ^a   Hsiao, I Chun ^a   Tsai, Dian Je ^b   Cheng, Lung Pan ^a   Hsiao, Fang I ^a   Chen, Mike Y ^a,b   Huang, Polly ^a   Hung, Yi Ping ^a,b  

^a Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering ^*  (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

2D marker; Frequency tag; Interactive surface; Multi touch; Physical interaction; Tags; Tangible; TUI

Indexed keywords

ENCODING (SYMBOLS); HAND HELD COMPUTERS; MODULATION;

2D MARKER; FREQUENCY TAG; INTERACTIVE SURFACES; MODULATION CIRCUITS; MULTI-TOUCH; PHYSICAL INTERACTIONS; TAG; TANGIBLE; TANGIBLE INTERACTION; TUI;

DISPLAY DEVICES;

EID: 79958113801     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1978942.1979386     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Barrett, G. and Omote, R. Projected-Capacitive Touch Technology. Information Display, March 2010/vol. 26, NO. 3, Society for Information Display, 17-18.
2. Baudisch, P., Becker, T., and Rudeck, F. Lumino: tangible blocks for tabletop computers based on glass fiber bundles. In Proc. of CHI 2010, 1165-1174.
3. Block, F., Haller, M., Gellersen, H., Gutwin, C., and Billinghurst, M. VoodooSketch - extending interactive surfaces with adaptable interface palettes. In Proc. of TEI 2008, 55-58.
4. Chang, A.Y., Lee, W.C., and Lee, W.Y. 2010. Touchscreen Stylus. U.S. Patent US 2010/0053120 A1. Mar. 2010.
5. Dietz, P. and Leigh, D. (2001). DiamondTouch: a multiuser touch technology. ACM UIST. 219-226.
6. Fiala, M. ARTag, a fiducial marker system using digital techniques. In Proc. of IEEE CVPR 2005, 590-596 vol. 2.
7. Fitzmaurice, W.G., Ishii, H., and Buxton, W. Bricks: laying the foundations for graspable user interfaces. In Proc. of CHI 1995, 442-449.
8. GestureWorks. http://gestureworks.com/
9. Guo, C. and Sharlin, E. Exploring the use of tangible user interfaces for human-robot interaction: a comparative study. In Proc. of CHI 2008, 121-130.
10. Hinckley, K., Yatani, K., Pahud, M., Rodenhouse, J., Wilson, A., Benko, H., and Buxton, B. Pen + touch = new tools. In Proc. of UIST 2010, 27-36.
11. Ishii, H., Tangible bits: beyond pixels, In Proc. of TEI 2008, xv-xxv.
12. Ishii, H. The tangible user interface and its evolution. Communications of the ACM 2008, 32-36.
13. Izadi, S., Hodges, S., Butler, A., Rrustemi, A., and Buxton, B. ThinSight: integrated optical multi-touch sensing through thin form-factor displays. In Proc. of EDT 2007, Art. NO. 6.
14. Jordà, S., Geiger, G., Alonso, M., and Kaltenbrunner, M. The reacTable: exploring the synergy between live music performance and tabletop tangible interfaces. In Proc. of TEI 2007, 139-146.
15. Jordà, S., Julià, F.C., and Gallardo, D. Interactive surfaces and tangibles. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students 2010, vol. 16 (4), 21-28.
16. Liu, Y.C. and Tseng, H.H. 2009. Stylus and Electronic Device. U.S. Patent 2009/0167727 A1. Jul. 2009.
17. Minami, M., Fukuju, Y., Hirasawa, K., Yokoyama, S., Mizumachi, M., Morikawa, H., and Aoyama, T. Dolphin: A practical approach for implementing a fully distributed indoor ultrasonic positioning system. In Proc. of UBICOMP 2004, 347-356.
18. NET.2971 - The Microsoft Surface domino tag. http://www.xs4all.nl/~wrb/ Main/Index.htm.
19. Orit Shaer and Eva Hornecker. Tangible User Interfaces: Past, Present, and Future Directions. In Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction 3, 1 (2010) 1-138
20. Patten, J., Ishii, H., Hines, J., and Pangaro, G. Sensetable: A Wireless Object Tracking Platform for Tangible User Interfaces. In Proc. of CHI 2001, 253-260.
21. Patten, J., Ishii, H., and Recht, B. Audiopad: a tag-based interface for musical performance. In Proc. of NIME 2002, 1-6.
22. QR code. http://www.qrcode.com/index-e.html
23. Rekimoto, J. (2002). SmartSkin: an infrastructure for freehand manipulation on interactive surfaces. ACM CHI. 113-120.
24. Rice, C.A., Cain, B.C., and Fawcett, K.J. Dependable coding for fiducial tags. In Proc. of UCS 2004, 155-163.
25. Rice, C.A., Harle, K.R., and Beresford, R.A. Analysing fundamental properties of marker-based vision system designs. In PerCom 2006, 453-471.
26. Ullmer, B., Ishii, H., and Glas, D. mediaBlocks: physical containers, transports, and controls for online media. In Proc. of SIGGRAPH 1998, 379-386.
27. Ullmer, B., and Ishii, H. The metaDESK: models and prototypes for tangible user interfaces. In Proc. of UIST 1997, 223-232.
28. Underkoffler, J., and Ishii, H. Urp: a luminous-tangible workbench for urban planning and design. In Proc. of CHI 1999, 386-393.
29. Vogel, D. and Baudisch, P. 2007. Shift: A Technique for Operating Pen-Based Interfaces Using Touch. In Proc. CHI'07, 657-666. (Pubitemid 47581653)
30. Weiss, M., Wagner, J., Jennings, R., Jansen, Y., Khoshabeh, R., Hollan, D.J., and Borchers, J. SLAP widgets: bridging the gap between virtual and physical controls on tabletops. In Proc. of CHI 2009, 3229-3234.
31. Wilson, D.A. PlayAnywhere: a compact interactive tabletop projection-vision system. In Proc. of UIST 2005, 83-92.
32. Xu, D., Read, C.J., Mazzone, E., and Brown, M. Designing and testing a tangible interface prototype. In Proc. of IDC 2007, 25-28.
33. Zimmerman, D.T., Smith, R.J., Paradiso, A.J., Allport, D. and Gershenfeld, N. Applying electric field sensing to human-computer interfaces. In Proc. of CHI 1995, 280-287.