Perceptual and physiological responses to the visual complexity of fractal patterns

Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 89-114

  Taylor, R P ^a   Spehar, B ^b   Wise, J A ^c   Clifford, C W G ^d   Newell, B R ^e   Hagerhall, C M ^d,f   Purcell, T ^d   Martin, T P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^f SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Aesthetics; Fractals; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

AROUSAL; ART; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSE; ESTHETICS; FRACTAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY;

AROUSAL; ART; ATTENTION; ESTHETICS; FRACTALS; GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE; HUMANS; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY;

EID: 14544269362     PISSN: 10900578     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Abraham, F. D., Sprott, J. C., Mitina, O., Osorio, M., Dequito, E. A. & Pinili, J. M. (2003). Judgments of time, aesthetics, and complexity as a function of the fractal dimension of images formed by chaotic attractors. Unpublished manuscript.
2. Aks, D., & Sprott, J. (1996). Quantifying aesthetic preference for chaotic patterns, Empirical Studies of the Arts, 14, 1-16.
3. Appleton, J. (1975). The experience of landscape. London: Wiley.
4. Attneave, F. (1954). Some information aspects of visual perception, Psychological Review, 61, 183-193.
5. Attneavc, F. (1955). Symmetry, information and memory for patterns, American Journal of Psychology, 68, 209-222.
6. Avnir, D. (1998). Is the geometry of nature fractal, Science, 279, 39-40.
7. Balling, J.D. & Falk, J.H. (1982). Development of visual preference for natural environments, Environment and Behaviour, 14, 5-28.
8. Barnsley, M. (1993). Fractals everywhere. London: Academic Press.
9. Barrow, J.D. (2003). Art and Science - Les liaisons dangereuses? In J. Casti & A. Karlqvist (Eds.), Art and complexity (pp. 1-20). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
10. Billock, V.A. (2000). Neural acclimation to 1/f spatial frequency spectra in natural images transduced by human visual system, Physica D, 137, 379.
11. Billock, V. A, de Guzman, G. C., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2001). Fractal time and 1/f spectra in dynamic images and human vision. Physica D, 148, 136-146.
12. Birkhoff, G. D. (1933). Aesthetic measure. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
13. Bragg, M. (1987). Jackson Pollock, [TV documentary]. South Bank Show, Independent Television.
14. Briggs, J. (1992). Fractals. London: Thames and Hudson.
15. Burrough, P. A. (1981). Fractal dimensions of landscapes and other environmental data. Nature, 295, 240-242.
16. Cambel, A. B. (1993). Applied chaos theory: A paradigm for complexity. London: Academic Press.
17. Castrejon-Pita, J. R., Castrejon-Pita, A. A. Sarmiento-Galan, A. (2003). Nasca lines: a mystery wrapped in an enigma, Chaos, 13, 836-840.
18. Chopard, B., Hermann, H. J., & Vicsek, T. (1991). Structure and growth mechanism of mineral dendrites. Nature, 309, 409.
19. Clark, A. C. & Lesmoir-Smith, N. (1994). The fractal universe. London: New Moon and Gordon Film Productions.
20. Cohn, J. (1894). Experimentelle unterschungen uber die gefuhlsbetonung der farben helligkeiten, und ihrer combinationen. [Experimental investigations of the emotional meaning of the brightness of colors and of their combination.] Philosphische Studien, 10, 562-603.
21. Cutting, J. E. & Garvin, J. J. (1987). Fractal curves and complexity, Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 365-370.
22. Eaton, L. K. (1998). Fractal geometry in the late work of Frank Lloyd Wright: The Palmer House. In K. Williams (Eds.), Architecture and mathematics (pp.23-38). Firenze: Edizioni dell'Erba.
23. Family, F., Masters, B. R. & Platt. D. E. (1989). Fractal pattern formation in human retinal vessels. Physica D, 38, 98.
24. Feder, J. (1988). Fractals. New York: Plenum.
25. Field, D.J. (1987). Relationships between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells, Journal of the optical society of America, 4, 2379-2394.
26. Field, D.J. (1989). What the statistics of natural images tell us about visual coding. The SPIE Proceedings on human vision, visual processing and digital display, 7077, 269-276.
27. Field, D.J. & Brady, N. (1997). Visual sensitivity, blur and the sources of variability in the amplitude spectra of natural scenes. Vision Research, 37, 3367-3383.
28. Garner, W.R. (1962). Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts. New York: Wiley.
29. Geake, J. & Landini, G. (1997). Individual differences in the perception of fractal curves. Fractals, 5, 129-143.
30. Gilden, D. L., Schmuckler, M. A., & Clayton K. (1993). The perception of natural contour. Psychological Review, 100, 460-478.
31. Goldberger, A. L. (1996). Fractals and the birth of gothic. Molecular Psychiatry, 1, 99-104.
32. Gombrich, E. H. (1972). The visual image. Scientific American, 231, 82-96.
33. Gouyet, J.F. (1996). Physics and fractal structures. New York: Springer.
34. Hagerhall, C. M., Purcell, T., & Taylor, R. P. (2004). Fractal Dimension of Landscape silhouette as a predictor of landscape preference, The Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 247-255.
35. Heath, T., Smith, H. G. G., & Lim, B. (2000). Tall buildings and the urban skyline. The effect of visual complexity on preferences. Environment and behavior, 32, 541-556.
36. James, W. (1950). Principles of psychology. New York: Dover.
37. Jang, J., & Rajala, S. A. (1990). Segmentation based image coding using fractals and the human visual system, ICASSP proceedings, 1957-1960.
38. Kaplan, R.,& Kaplan, S. (1982). Cognition and environment: Functioning in an uncertain world. New York: Praeger.
39. Keller, J. M., Crownover, R. M, & Chen, R. Y. (1987). Characteristics of natural scenes related to the fractal dimension. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 9, 621-627.
40. Knill D. C., Field D., & Kersten D. (1990). Human discrimination of fractal images. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 77, 1113-1123.
41. Louis, E., Guinea F., & Flores, F. (1986). The fractal nature of fracture. In L. Pietronero and E. Tossati (Eds.), Fractals in physics (pp. 177). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
42. Lovejoy, S. (1982). Area-perimeter pelation for pain and cloud areas. Science, 216, 185.
43. Lind, R. (1992). The aesthetic essence of art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 50, 117.
44. Mandelbrot, B. B. (1977). The fractal geometry of nature. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
45. Mandelbrot, B. B. (1993). Fractals and an art for the sake of science. In M. Emmer (Ed.). The visual mind(pp.11-14) Cambridge: MIT press.
46. Matsushita, M. & Fukiwara. H. (1993). Fractal growth and morphological change in bacterial colony formation. In J.M. Garcia-Ruiz, E. louis, P. Meaken, & L.M. Sander (Eds.), Growth patterns in physical sciences and biology (pp. 23-40). New York: Plenum Press.
47. Morse, D. R., Larson, J. H., Dodson, M. M., & Williamson, M. H. (1985). Fractal dimension of anthropod body lengths. Nature, 315, 731-733.
48. Niemeyer, L., Pietronero, L., & Wiesmann, H. J. (1984). Fractal dimension of dielectric breakdown. Physical Review Letters, 52, 1033-1036.
49. Nittmann, J. & Stanley, H. E. (1987). Non-deterministic approach to anisotropic growth patterns with continuously tunable morphology: The fractal properties of some real snowflakes. Journal of Physics A, 20, L1185-1189.
50. Orians, G. H. (1986). Anecological and evolutionary approach to landscape aesthetics. Landscape meaning and Values. London: Allen and Unwin.
51. Orians, G. H. & Heerwagen, J. H. (1992). Evolved response to landscapes. In E. C. Penning-Rowsell & D. Lowenthal (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 3-23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52. nd Edition) (pp. 184-190). New York: Wiley.
53. Pentland, A. P. (1984). Fractal-based description of natural scenes. IEEE Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-6, 661-674.
54. Purcell, T. & Lamb, R. J. (1984). Landscape perception: An examination and empirical investigation of the two central issues in the area. Journal of environmental management, 19, 31-63.
55. Pickover, C. (1995). Keys to infinity. New York: Wiley.
56. Potter, J. (1985). To a violent grave: An oral biography of Jackson Pollock. New York: G.P. Putman and Sons.
57. Rayner, K. & Pollatsek, A. (1992). Eye movements and scene perception, Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 342-376.
58. Richards, R. (2001). A new aesthetic for environmental awareness: Chaos theory, the beauty of nature, and our broader humanistic identity. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 41, 59-95.
59. Richards, R. & Kerr, C. (1999). The fractal form of nature: A resonant aesthetics. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Society for Chaos Theory in Psychology & Life Sciences, Berkeley CA.
60. Rogowitz, B. E. & Voss, R. F. (1990). Shape perception and low dimensional fractal boundary contours. Proceedings of the conference on human vision: Methods, Models and Applications, S.P.I.E., 1249, 387-394.
61. Ruderman, D. L. (1997). Origins of scaling in natural images. Vision Research, 37, 3385
62. Russell, J. & Snodgrass, J. (1987). Emotion and the environment. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 245-280). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
63. Schroeder, M. (1991). Fractals, chaos and power laws. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
64. Skjeltorp, A. T., & Meakin, P. (1988). Fractature in microsphere monolayers studied by experiments and computer simulations. Nature, 335, 424-426.
65. Spehar, B., Clifford, C., Newell, B., & Taylor, R. P. (2003). Universal aesthetic of fractals. Chaos and Graphics, 37, 813-820.
66. Sprott, J. C. (1993). Automatic generation of strange attractors. Computer and Graphics, 17, 325-332.
67. Stamps, A. E. (2002). Fractals, skylines, nature and beauty. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60, 163-184.
68. Switkes, E., Mayer, M. J., & Stoan, J. A. (1978). Spatial frequency analysis of the visual environment: anisotropy and the carpentered environment hypothesis. Vision Research, 18, 1393-1399.
69. Taylor, R. P. (1998). Splashdown. New Scientist, 2144, 30-31.
70. Taylor, R. P. (2000). Jackson Pollock: Nature, chaos and fractals. Masters thesis, University of New South Wales, Australia.
71. Taylor, R. P. (2001). Architect reaches for the clouds. Nature, 410, 18.
72. Taylor, R. P. (2002a). Spotlight on a visual language. Nature, 415, 961.
73. Taylor, R. P. (2002b). Order in Pollock's chaos. Scientific American, 287, December, 84-89.
74. Taylor, R. P. (2003a). Fractal expressionism-where art meets science. In J. Casti & A. Karlqvist (Eds.), Art and complexity (pp. 117-144). Amsterdam: Elsevier Press.
75. Taylor, R. P. (2003b). Second nature: The magic of fractals from Pollock to Gehry, New Architect, 7, 16-20.
76. Taylor, R. P., Micolich, A.P., & Jonas, D. (1999a). Fractal analysis of Pollock's drip paintings. Nature, 399, 422.
77. Taylor, R. P., Micolich, A. P., & Jonas, D. (1999b). Fractal expressionism. Physics World, 12, 25-28.
78. Taylor, R. P., Micolich, A. P., & Jonas, D. (2002). The construction of Pollock's fractal drip paintings. Leonardo, 35, 203.
79. Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman & J.F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85-125). New York: Plenum Press.
80. Ulrich, R. S. & Simons, R. F. (1986). Recovery from stress during exposure to everyday outdoor environments. Proceedings of EDRA, 17, 115-122.
81. Ulrich, R. S. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia and natural landscapes. The biophilia hypothesis. Washington DC: Island Press.
82. Van Tender, G. J., Lyons, M. J., & Ejima, Y. (2002). Visual structure of a Japanese Zen garden. Nature, 419, 359.
83. Varnedoe, K., & Karmel, K. (1998). Jackson Pollock. New York: Abrams.
84. Voss, R.F. (1998). Local connected fractal dimension analysis of early Chinese landscape paintings and X-ray mammograms. Fractal image encoding and analysis, NATO ASI series, 159, 279-297.
85. Wise, J. A. & Rosenberg, E. (1986). The effects of interior treatments on performance stress in three types of mental tasks. Technical Report, Space Human Factors Office, NASA-ARC, Sunnyvale CA.
86. Wise, J A. & Hazzard, T. L. (2000). Bionomic design. Architech, 24, January, 24.
87. Wise, J. A. & Taylor, R. P. (2002, October). Fractal design strategies for enhancement of knowledge work environments. Paper presented to the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Meeting, Baltimore MD.
88. Werner, B. T. (1999). Complexity in natural landform patterns. Science, 102, 284.
89. Zeki, S. (1999). Inner vision: An exploration of art and the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.