Successful mixing? effects of Urban restructuring policies in Dutch neighbourhoods

Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie

Volumn 102, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 361-368

  Bolt, Gideon ^a   Van Kempen, Ronald ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Neighbourhood satisfaction; Social mixing; Urban restructuring

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958096000     PISSN: 0040747X     EISSN: 14679663     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2011.00668.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Arthurson, K. (2002), Creating Inclusive Communities through Balancing Social Mix: A Critical Relationship or Tenuous Link? Urban Policy and Research 20, pp. 1-29.
2. Baum, S., K. Arthurson & K. Rickson (2010), Happy People in Mixed-up Places: The Association between the Degree and Type of Local Socio-economic Mix and Expressions of Neighbourhood Satisfaction. Urban Studies 47, pp. 467-485.
3. Bolt, G. (2009), Combating Residential Segregation of Ethnic Minorities in European Cities. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 24, pp. 397-405.
4. Bond, L., Sautkina, E., & Kearns, A. (2011), Mixed Messages about Mixed Tenure: Do Reviews Tell the Real Story? Housing Studies 26, pp. 69-94.
5. Brown, G., B.B. Brown & D.D. Perkins (2004), New Housing as Neighborhood Revitalization: Place Attachment and Confidence among Residents. Environment and Behavior 36, pp. 749-775.
6. Camina, M.M. & M.J. Wood (2009), Parallel Lives: Towards a Greater Understanding of What Mixed Communities Can Offer. Urban Studies 46, pp. 459-480.
7. Dekker, K. & G. Bolt (2005), Social Cohesion in Post-war Estates in the Netherlands: Differences between Socio-economic and Ethnic groups. Urban Studies 42, pp. 2447-2770.
8. Galster, G. (2007), Should Policy Makers Strive for Neighborhood Social Mix? An Analysis of the Western European Evidence Base. Housing Studies 22, pp. 523-545.
9. Goodchild, B. & I. Cole (2001), Social Balance and Mixed Neighbourhoods in Britain since 1979: A Review of Discourse and Practice in Social Housing. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 19, pp. 103-121.
10. Graham, E., D. Manley, R. Hiscock, P. Boyle & J. Doherty (2009), Mixing Housing Tenures: Is it Good for Social Well-being? Urban Studies 46, pp. 139-165.
11. Hastings, A., & Dean, J. (2003), Challenging Images: Tackling Stigma through Estate Regeneration. Policy & Politics 31, pp. 171-184.
12. Joseph, M.L., R.J. Chaskin & H.S. Webber (2007), The Theoretical Basis for Addressing Poverty through Mixed-income Development. Urban Affairs Review 42, PP. 369-409.
13. Jupp, B. (1999), Living Together - Community Life on Mixed Housing Estates. London: Demos.
14. Kearns, A. & R. Forrest (2000), Social Cohesion and Multilevel Urban Governance. Urban Studies 37, pp. 995-1017.
15. Kearns, A. & P. Mason (2007), Mixed Tenure Communities and Neighbourhood Quality. Housing Studies 22, pp. 661-991.
16. Kleinhans, R. (2004), Social Implications of Housing Diversification in Urban Renewal: A Review of Recent Literature. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 19, pp. 367-390.
17. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (2007), National Housing Survey 2006. Amsterdam: VROM.
18. Mohan, J. & L. Twigg (2007) Sense of Place, Quality of Life and Local Socio-economic Context: Evidence from the Survey of English Housing, 2002/3. Urban Studies 44, pp. 2029-2045.
19. Murie, A., T. Knorr-Siedow & R. Van Kempen (2003) Large Housing Estates in Europe - General Developments and Theoretical Background. Utrecht: Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University.
20. Musterd, S. & R. Andersson (2005), Housing Mix, Social Mix, and Social Opportunities. Urban Affairs Review 40, pp. 761-790.
21. Permentier, M., G. Bolt & M. Van Ham (2011), Determinants of Neighbourhood Satisfaction and Perception of Neighbourhood Reputation. Urban Studies 48, pp. 977-996.
22. Sampson, R.J. & W.B. Groves (1989) Community Structure and Crime: Testing Social-disorganization Theory. American Journal of Sociology 94. pp. 774-802.
23. Tunstall, R. (2003), 'Mixed Tenure' Policy in the UK: Privatisation, Pluralism or Euphemism? Housing, Theory and Society, 20, pp. 153-159.
24. Uitermark, J., J.W. Duyvendak & R. Kleinhans (2007), Gentrification as a Governmental Strategy: Social Control and Social Cohesion in Hoogvliet, Rotterdam. Environment and Planning A 39, pp. 125-141.
25. Van Beckhoven, E. & R. Van Kempen (2003), Social Effects of Urban Restructuring: A Case Study in Amsterdam and Utrecht, the Netherlands. Housing Studies 18, pp. 853-875.
26. Van Bergeijk, E., A. Kokx, G. Bolt & R. Van Kempen (2008), Helpt Herstructurering? Effecten van Stedelijke Herstructurering op Wijken en Bewoners. Delft: Eburon.
27. Van Eijk, G. (2010), Unequal Networks - Spatial Segregation, Relationships and Inequality in the City. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
28. Van Ham, M. & D. Manley (2010), The Effect of Neighbourhood Housing Tenure Mix on Labour Market Outcomes: A Longitudinal Investigation of Neighbourhood Effects. Journal of Economic Geography, 10, pp. 257-282.
29. Van Kempen, R. & G. Bolt (2009), Social Cohesion, Social Mix, and Urban Policies in the Netherlands. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 24, pp. 457-475.
30. Wilson, W.J. (1987), The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
31. Wittebrood, K., & T. Van Dijk (2007), Aandacht voor de Wijk - Effecten van Herstructurering op de Leefbaarheid en de Veiligheid. Den Haag: SCP.