Rendering physical effects in tabletop controls

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 3009-3012

  Weiss, Malte ^a   Remy, Christian ^b   Jan, Borchers ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Actuation; Haptics; Interactive tabletops; Physical properties; Tangible user interfaces

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); DYNAMICS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS; INTERACTIVE DEVICES; USER INTERFACES;

ACTUATION; CONCEPT PROTOTYPE; ELECTROMAGNETIC ACTUATION; HAPTICS; INTERACTIVE TABLETOP; MAGNETIC-FIELD; ON-THE-FLY; PHYSICAL EFFECTS; RESISTANCE FRICTION; TANGIBLE USER INTERFACES;

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES;

EID: 79958080081     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1978942.1979388     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. W. W. Gaver. Auditory Icons: using sound in computer interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction, 2(2):167-177, 1986.
2. C. Harrison and S. E. Hudson. Providing dynamically changeable physical buttons on a visual display. In Proc. of CHI '09, 299-308.
3. A. Hoffmann, D. Spelmezan, and J. Borchers. TypeRight: a keyboard with tactile error prevention. In Proc. of CHI '09, 2265-2268.
4. Y. Jansen, T. Karrer, and J. Borchers. MudPad: tactile feedback and haptic texture overlay for touch surfaces. In Proc. of ITS '10, 11-14.
5. S. Jorda, G. Geiger, M. Alonso, and M. Kaltenbrunner. The reacTable: exploring the synergy between live music performance and tabletop tangible interfaces. In Proc. of TEI '07, 139-146.
6. A. Krzywinski, H. Mi, W. Chen, and M. Sugimoto. RoboTable: a tabletop framework for tangible interaction with robots in a mixed reality. In Proc. of ACE '09, 107-114.
7. T. H. Massie and K. J. Salisbury. The PHANToM haptic interface: a device for probing virtual objects. In Proc. of ASME '94, 295-302.
8. G. Pangaro, D. Maynes-Aminzade, and H. Ishii. The Actuated Workbench: computer-controlled actuation in tabletop tangible interfaces. In Proc. of UIST '02, 181-190.
9. J. Patten and H. Ishii. Mechanical constraints as computational constraints in tabletop tangible interfaces. In Proc. of CHI '07, 809-818.
10. I. Poupyrev, T. Nashida, and M. Okabe. Actuation and tangible user interfaces: the Vaucanson duck, robots, and shape displays. In Proc. of TEI '07, 205-212.
11. C. Ramstein and V. Hayward. The pantograph: a large workspace haptic device for multimodal human computer interaction. In Proc. of CHI '94, 57-58.
12. D. Reznik and J. Canny. C'mon part, do the local motion! In Proc. of ICRA '01, 2235-2242.
13. K. Salisbury, F. Conti, and F. Barbagli. Haptic rendering: introductory concepts. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 24(2):24-32, 2004.
14. C. Swindells, K. E. MacLean, K. S. Booth, and M. J. Meitner. Exploring affective design for physical controls. In Proc. of CHI '07, 933-942.
15. M. Weiss, F. Schwarz, S. Jakubowski, and J. Borchers. Madgets: actuating widgets on interactive tabletops. In Proc. of UIST '10, 293-302.
16. M. Weiss, J. Wagner, Y. Jansen, R. Jennings, R. Khoshabeh, J. D. Hollan, and J. Borchers. SLAP widgets: bridging the gap between virtual and physical controls on tabletops. In Proc. of CHI '09, 481-490.