The stability and breakdown of empire: European informal empire in China, the Ottoman Empire and Egypt

European Journal of International Relations

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 161-185

  Savage, Jesse Dillon ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

colonialization; empire; International Relations; limited sovereignty; sovereignty

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958037623     PISSN: 13540661     EISSN: 14603713     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1354066110364287     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Abernathy DThe Dynamics of Global Dominance: European Overseas Empires 1415-1980. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2000:.
2. Ahmad F.Ottoman perceptions of the capitulations 1800-1914.Journal of Islamic Studies. 2000;11 (1): 1-20.
3. Al-Sayyid ALEgypt and Cromer: A Study in Anglo-Egyptian Relations. London: John Murray; 1968:.
4. Al-Sayyid-Marsot ALEgypt in the Reign of Muhammad Ali. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984:.
5. Al-Sayyid-Marsot ALThe Oxford History of the British Empire: the Nineteenth Century 3. Porter A, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999:651-664.
6. Barkey KBandits and Bureaucrats: The Ottoman Route to State Centralization. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1994:.
7. Barkey KEmpire of Difference: The Ottomans in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008:.
8. Bayly CIndian Society and the Making of the British Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988:.
9. Bull HThe Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press; 1977:.
10. Bull H,Watson AThe Expansion of International Society. Bull HWatson A, ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1984:1-12.
11. Cain PJ,Hopkins AGBritish Imperialism 1688-2000. London: Longman; 2002:.
12. Cannon B.A reassessment of judicial reform in Egypt, 1876-1891.International Journal of African Historical Studies. 1972;5 (1): 51-74.
13. Cannon BPolitics of Law and the Courts in Nineteenth Century Egypt. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press; 1988:.
14. Cassel P.Excavating extraterritoriality: The 'Judicial Sub-Prefect' as a prototype for the Mixed Court in Shanghai.Late Imperial China. 2003;24 (2): 156-182.
15. Cizaka MA Comparative Evolution of Business Partnerships: The Islamic World and Europe, with Special Reference to the Ottoman Archives. Leiden: Brill; 1996:.
16. Clay CGold for the Sultan: Western Bankers and Ottoman Finance 1856-1881. London: I.B. Tauris; 2000:.
17. Clifford NSpoilt Children of Empire: Westerners in Shanghai and the Chinese Revolution of the 1920s. Hanover: Middlebury College Press; 1991:.
18. Cohen BKingship and Colonialism in India's Deccan, 1850-1948. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007:.
19. Cole JColonialism and Revolution in the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1993:.
20. Collier D,Mahoney J,Seawright JRethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Brady HCollier D, ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield; 2004:85-102.
21. Crossley PThe Translucent Mirror: History and Identity in Qing Imperial Ideology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1999:.
22. Davison RImperial Legacy: The Ottoman Imprint on the Balkans and the Middle East. Brown LC, ed. New York: Columbia University Press; 1996:174-199.
23. Doyle MEmpires. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1986:.
24. Edelstein DOccupational Hazards: Success and Failure in Military Occupations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2008:.
25. Eldem EFrench Trade in Istanbul in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999:.
26. Eldem EThe Cambridge History of Turkey: The Later Ottoman Empire. Faroqhi S, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006:1603 283-1839 335.
27. Elliot JEmpires of the Atlantic World: Spain and Britain in the Americas 1492-1830. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2006:.
28. Elster JExplaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007:.
29. Eng RChinese Research Monograph. Berkeley, CA: Institute of East Asian Studies; 1986:.
30. Falleti T,Lynch J.Context and causal mechanisms in political analysis.Comparative Political Studies. 2009;42 (9): 1143-1166.
31. Faroqhi SThe Ottoman Empire and the World Around it. London: I.B. Tauris; 2004:.
32. Fazal TState Death: The Politics and Geography of Conquest, Occupation, and Annexation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007:.
33. Feuerwerker AThe Foreign Establishment in China in the Early Twentieth Century. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Chinese Studies, University of Michigan; 1976:.
34. Feuerwerker AThe Chinese Economy, 1870-1890. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Chinese Studies, University of Michigan; 1995:.
35. Fishel WThe End of Extraterritoriality in China. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1952:.
36. George A,Bennett ACase Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2005:.
37. Gerring J.Is there a (viable) crucial-case method?.Comparative Political Analysis. 2007;40 (3): 231-253.
38. Gerring J,Seawright J.Case selection techniques in case study research.Political Research Quarterly. 2008;61 (2): 294-308.
39. Gilpin RWar and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1981:.
40. Greif AInstitutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006:.
41. Gordon SThe Marathas 1600-1818. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1993:.
42. Habib IConfronting Colonialism: Resistance and Modernization under Haidar Ali and Tipu Sultan. Habib I, ed. London: Anthem Press, xvii-xlvii; 2002:.
43. Hanioglu MSA Brief History of the Late Ottoman Empire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2008:.
44. Hao YP,Wang EMThe Cambridge History of China: Volume 2 Late Ch'ing 1800-1911. Fairbank JTwitchett D, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1980:142-201.
45. Hopkins AG.The Victorians and Africa: A reconsideration of the occupation of Egypt, 1882.The Journal of African History. 1986;27 (2): 363-391.
46. Horowitz R.International law and state transformation in China, Siam, and the Ottoman Empire during the nineteenth century.Journal of World History. 2005;15 (4): 445-486.
47. Horowitz R.Politics, power and the Chinese maritime customs: The Qing restoration and the ascent of Robert Hart.Modern Asian Studies. 2006;40 (3): 549-581.
48. Hoyle MMixed Courts of Egypt. London: Graham & Trotman; 1991:.
49. Hyam RBritain's Imperial Century, 1815-1914: A Study of Empire. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2002:.
50. Islamoglu H.Modernities compared: State transformations and constitutions of property in the Qing and Ottoman Empires.Journal of Early Modern History. 2001;5 (4): 353-386.
51. Karsh E,Karsh IEmpires of the Sand. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1999:.
52. Keyder CAfter Empire. Barkey Kvon Hagen M, ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1997:30-44.
53. Khoury DRState and Provincial Society in the Ottoman Empire: 1540-1834. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997:.
54. Khoury DRThe Cambridge History of Turkey: The Later Ottoman Empire, 1603-1839. Faroqhi S, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006:135-156.
55. Krasner SSovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1999:.
56. Kunt MThe Sultan's Servants: The Transformation of Ottoman Provincial Government, 1550-1650. New York: Columbia University Press; 1983:.
57. Kuran T.The economic assent of the Middle East's religious minorities: The role of Islamic legal pluralism.Journal of Legal Studies. 2004a;:475-515.
58. Kuran T.Why the Middle East is economically underdeveloped: Historical mechanisms of institutional stagnation.Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2004b;18 (3): 71-90.
59. Lake D.Anarchy, hierarchy, and the variety of international relations.International Organization. 1996;50 (1): 1-33.
60. Lake D.Escape from the state of nature: Authority and hierarchy in world politics.International Security. 2007;32 (1): 47-79.
61. Landes DBankers and Pashas: International Finance and Economic Imperialism in Egypt. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1958:.
62. Lange M.British colonial legacies and political development.World Development. 2004;32 (6): 905-922.
63. Lee RFrance and the Exploitation of China, 1885-1901: A Study in Economic Imperialism. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989:.
64. Lieberman R.Ideas, institutions and political order: Explaining political change.American Political Science Review. 2002;96 (4): 697-712.
65. Macauley M.A world made simple: Law and property in the Ottoman and Qing Empires.Journal of Early Modern History. 2001;5 (4): 331-352.
66. Mahoney JComparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Mahoney JRueschmeyer D, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003:337-372.
67. Minoglou IP.Ethnic minority groups in international banking: Greek diaspora bankers of Constantinople and Ottoman state finances, c. 1840-81.Financial History Review. 2002;9 (2): 125-146.
68. Moravcsik A.Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics.International Organization. 1997;51 (4): 513-553.
69. Newbury CThe Oxford History of the British Empire: the Nineteenth Century. Porter A, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999:624-650.
70. Nexon D.What's this then? 'Romanes eunt domus'?.International Studies Perspectives. 2008;9 (3): 300-308.
71. Nexon D,Wright T.What's at stake in the American empire debate?.American Political Science Review. 2007;101 (2): 253-271.
72. Osterhammel JImperialism and After: Continuities and Discontinuities. Mommsen WOsterhammel J, ed. London: Allen and Unwin; 1986:290-314.
73. Pamuk SThe Ottoman Empire and European Capitalism, 1820-1913: Trade, Investment and Production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987:.
74. Panzac D.International and domestic maritime trade in the Ottoman Empire during the 18th century.International Journal of Middle East Studies. 1992;24 (2): 189-206.
75. Petersson NGentlemanly Capitalism, Imperialism and Global History. Akita S, ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2002:103-122.
76. Phimister I.Foreign devils, finance and informal empire: Britain and China c. 1900-1912.Modern Asian Studies. 2006;40 (3): 737-759.
77. Purdue P.Empire and nation in comparative perspective: Frontier administration ineighteenth-century China.Journal of Early Modern History. 2001;5 (4): 282-304.
78. Robinson R,Gallagher JAfrica and the Victorians: The Official Mind of Imperialism. London: Macmillan; 1961:.
79. Salzmann ATocqueville in the Ottoman Empire: Rival Paths to the Modern State. Leiden: Brill; 2004:.
80. Scholch AEgypt for the Egyptians: The Socio-Political Crisis in Egypt 1818-1882. London: Ithaca Press; 1981:.
81. Scott JHThe Law Affecting Foreigners in Egypt As the Result of the Capitulations, with an Account of Their Origin and Development. Edinburgh: William Green and Sons; 1908:.
82. Skocpol T,Somers M.The uses of comparative history in macrosocial inquiry.Comparative Studies in Society and History. 1980;22:174-197.
83. Snyder JMyths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1991:.
84. Spruyt HEnding Empire: Contested Sovereignty and Territorial Partition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2005:.
85. Stein B.State formation and economy reconsidered: Part one.Modern Asian Studies. 1985;19 (3): 387-413.
86. St John IDisraeli and the Art of Victorian Politics. London: Anthem Press; 2005:.
87. Sunar IOttoman Empire and the World Economy. Islamoglu-Inan H, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987:63-87.
88. Susa NThe Capitulatory Regime of Turkey. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press; 1933:.
89. Tu-Ki MNational Polity and Local Power: The Transformation of Late Imperial China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1989:.
90. Van Den Boogert MThe Capitulations and the Ottoman Legal System: Qadis, Consuls and Beraths in the 18th Century. Leiden: Brill; 2005:.
91. Vincent RJNonintervention and International Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1974:.
92. Wakeman FConflict and Control in Late Imperial China. Wakeman FGrant C, ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1975:1-25.
93. Waltz KTheory of International Politics. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill; 1979:.
94. Wendt A,Friedheim DState Sovereignty as Social Construct. Biersteker TWeber C, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996:240-277.
95. Wight MSystems of States. Leicester: Leicester University Press for the London School of Economics and Political Science; 1977:.
96. Wong RBChina Transformed: Historical Change and the Limits of European Experience. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1997:.
97. Wong RB.Formal and informal mechanisms of rule and economic development: The Qing Empire in comparative perspective.Journal of Early Modern History. 2001;5 (4): 387-408.
98. Young CThe African Colonial State in Comparative Perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1994:.
99. Zakaria FFrom Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of America's World Role. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1998:.