Young people's eweryday literacles: The language festures of instant messaging

Research in the Teaching of English

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 378-404

  Haas, Christina ^a   Takayoshi, Pamela ^b   Carr, Brandon ^c   Hudson, Kimberley ^b   Pollock, Ross ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958025543     PISSN: 0034527X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Baron, N. (2004). See you online: Gender issues in college student use of instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23(4), 397-423. (Pubitemid 39604031)
2. Baron, N. (2008). Always online: Language in an online and mobile world. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanic, R. (Eds). (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. New York: Routledge.
4. Bolter, J. (1991). Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Brandt, D. (2001). Literacy in American lives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bryant, J. A., Sanders-Jackson, A., & Small-wood, A. (2006). IMing, text messaging, and adolescent social networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol 1 l/issue2/bryant. html.
7. Chapman, R. (Ed.). (1986). New dictionary of American slang. New York: Harper and Row.
8. Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Mul-tiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. New York: Routledge.
9. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Introduction: Multiliteracies: The beginnings of an idea. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multi-literacies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 3-8). New York: Routledge.
10. Cushman, E. (1998). The struggle and the tools: Oral and literate strategies in an inner city community. Albany: State University of New York Press.
11. Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Crystal, D. (2008). txtng: thegr8 db8. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13. De Pourbalx, R. Emergent literacy practices in an electronic community. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 180-196). New York: Routledge.
14. Dumas, B. K., & Lighter, J. (1978). Is slang a word for linguists? American Speech 53, 5-17.
15. Dyson, A. H. (1997). Writing superheroes: Contemporary childhood, popular culture, and classroom literacy. New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Dyson, A. H. (2008). Staying in the (curricular) lines: Practice constraints and possibilities in childhood writing. Written Communication 25,119-159.
17. Farkas, K., & Haas, C. (Forthcoming). A grounded theory approach for studying writing and literacy. In K. M. Powell & P. Takayoshi (Eds.), Practicing research in writing studies: Reflections on ethically responsible research. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
18. Farr, M. (2005). Latino language and literacy in ethnolinguistic Chicago. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Ferrara, K., Bruner, H., & Whittemore, G. (1991). Interactive written discourse as an emergent register. Written Communication 8,8-34.
20. Flanagin, A. J. (2005). IM online: Instant Messaging use among college students. Communication Research Reports 22, 175-187.
21. Flower, L., Long, E., & Higgins, L. (2000). Learning to rival: The practice of intercultural inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.
23. Gee, J. P. (2000a). New people in new worlds: Networks, the new capitalism, and schools. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multilitera-cies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 43-68). New York: Routledge.
24. Gee, J. P. (2000b). The New Literacy Studies: From the 'socially situated' to the work of the social. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 180-196). New York: Routledge.
25. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.
26. Gere, A. R. (1997). Intimate practices: Literacy and cultural work in U. S. Women's Clubs, 1880-1920. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
27. Gere, A. R. (1994). Kitchen tables and rented rooms: The extracurriculum of composition. College Composition and Communication, 45(1), 75-92.
28. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
29. Gumperz, J., & Berenz, N. (1993). Transcribing conversational exchanges. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 91-122). Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Haas, C, Takayoshi, P., & Carr, B. (Forthcoming). Analytic strategies, competent inquiries, and methodological tensions in the study of writing. In L. Nikoson & M. Sheridan-Rabideau(Eds.), New directions in writing studies research. Carbondale, IL.: Southern Illinois University Press.
31. Harris, R. (1996). Signs of writing. New York: Routledge.
32. Haswell, R. (2005). NCTE/CCCC's recent war on scholarship. Written Communication, 22,198-223. (Pubitemid 40924101)
33. Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (2002). School's out! Bridging out-of-school literacies with classroom practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
34. Hult, C, & Richins, R. (2006). The rhetoric and discourse of Instant Messaging. Computers and Composition Online, http://www.bgsu.edu/cconline/ hultrichins-im/hultrichins-im.htm
35. Jacobs, G. (2004). Complicating contexts: Issues of methodology in researching the language and literacies of Instant Messaging. Reading Research Quarterly, 39,394-406. (Pubitemid 39603884)
36. Jacobs, G. (2006). Fast times and digital literacy: Participation roles and portfolio construction within Instant Messaging. Journal of Literacy Research, 38,171-196. (Pubitemid 44769362)
37. Jones, K. (2000). Becoming just another alphanumeric code: Farmers' encounters with the literacy and discourse practices of agricultural bureaucracy at the livestock auction. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic. (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 70-90). New York: Routledge.
38. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
39. Labov, T. (1992). Social and language boundaries among adolescents. American Speech, 67, 339-366.
40. Lampe, C, Eluson, E., & Steinfield, C. (2006). A face(book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. CSCW'06, 167-170. (Pubitemid 47112404)
41. Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
42. Lee, C. K.-M. (2007). Affordances and text-making practices in online Instant Messaging. Written Communication, 24,223-249.
43. Lewis, C. & Fabos, B. (2005). Instant Messaging, literacies, and social identities. Reading Research Quarterly, 40,470-501. (Pubitemid 41560608)
44. Lewis, C, Enciso, P., & Moje, E. B. (Eds.) (2007). Reframing sociocultural research onliteracy: Identity, agency, and power. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45. Ling, R., & Baron, N. (2007). Text messaging and IM: A linguistic comparison of American college data. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26, 291-298.
46. Luke, C. (2000). Cyber-schooling and technological change: Multiliteracies for new times. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis. (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 69-91). New York: Routledge.
47. MacDonald, S. P. (2007). The erasure of language. College Composition and Communication, 58, 585-625.
48. Mencken, H. L. (1963). The American language: An inquiry into the development of English in the United States. (R. I. McDavid, ed.). New York: Knopf.
49. Michaels, S., & Collins, J. (1984). Oral discourse styles: Classroom interaction and the acquisition of literacy. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp. 219-244). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
50. Moss, B. (2003). A community text arises: A literacy text and a literacy tradition in African-American churches. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
51. Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S., & Bradner, E. (2000). Interaction and outeraction: Instant Messaging in action. CSCW '00, 79-88. (Pubitemid 32400038)
52. Nastri, J., Pena, J., & Hancock, J. (2006). The construction of away messages: A speech act analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11,1025-1045. (Pubitemid 44571159)
53. Ormerod, E, & Ivanic, R. (2000). Texts in practices: Interpreting the physical characteristics of children's project work. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic. (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 91-107). New York: Routledge.
54. Peck, W., Flower, L., & Higgins, L. (1995). Community literacy. College Composition and Communication, 46,199-222.
55. Perez-Sabater, C, Pena-Martinez, G., Turney, E., & Montero-Fleta, B. (2008). A spoken genre gets written: Online football commentaries in English, French, and Spanish. Written Communication, 25,235-261.
56. Purcell-Gates, V. (2007). (Ed.). Cultural practices of literacy: Case studies of language, literacy, social practice, and power. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
57. Quan-Haase, A. (2008). Instant messaging on campus: Use and integration in university students' everyday communication. The Information Society, 24(2), 105-115.
58. Selfe, C. L. & Hawisher, G. E. (2004). Literate lives in the information age: Narratives of literacy from the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59. Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. Thurlow, C. (2006). From statistical panic to moral panic: The metadiscursive construction and popular exaggeration of new media language in the print media. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 11(3), 667-701. (Pubitemid 44393653)
61. Walpole, J. R. (1974). Eye dialect in fictional dialogue. College Composition and Communication, 25,191-196.
62. Wilson, A. (2000). There is no escape from third-space theory: Borderland discourse and the 'in-between' literacies of prisons. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic. (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 54-69). New York: Routledge.
63. Witte, S. P. (1992). Context, text, intertext: Toward a constructivist semiotic of writing. Written Communication, 9,237-308.
64. Yancey, K. B. (2009). Writing in the twenty-first century: A report from the National Council of Teachers of English. Urbana, IL: NCTE.