From falsification to generating an alternative hypothesis: Exploring the role of the new-perspective hypothesis in successful 2-4-6 task performance

Thinking and Reasoning

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 105-136

  Lien, Yunn Wen ^a   Lin, Wei Lun ^b  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b FO GUANG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Alternative hypothesis; Disconfirmatory evidence; New perspective hypothesis; Rule discovery; Wason's task

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958006010     PISSN: 13546783     EISSN: 14640708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13546783.2011.553466     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adsit, D. J., & London, M. (1997). Effects of hypothesis generation on hypothesis testing in rule-discovery tasks. Journal of General Psychology, 124, 19-34.
2. Bassok, M., & Trope, Y. (1984). People's strategies for testing hypotheses about another's personality: Confirmatory or diagnostic? Social Cognition, 2, 199-216.
3. Chen, Y-C. (2008). Does collaboration facilitate rule discovery? Different types of information exchange and domination influence new ideas generation [in Chinese]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National Taiwan University, Taiwan.
4. Cherubini, P., Castelvecchio, E., & Cherubini, A. M. (2005). Generation of hypotheses in Wason's 2-4-6 task: An information theory approach. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 309-332.
5. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Creativity: Shifting across ontological categories flexibly. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 209-234). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6. Dominowski, R. L. (1995). Productive problem solving. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 73-96). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Evans, J. St. B. T. (1989). Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
8. Evans, J. St. B. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(10), 454-459.
9. Evans, J. St. B. T. (2007). Hypothetical thinking: Dual processes in reasoning and judgment. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
10. Farris, H., & Revlin, R. (1989). The discovery process: A counterfactual strategy. Social Studies of Science, 19, 497-513.
11. Gale, M., & Ball, L. J. (2006). Dual-goal facilitation in Wason's 2-4-6 task: What mediates successful rule discovery? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 873-885.
12. Gale, M., & Ball, L. J. (2009). Exploring the determinants of dual goal facilitation in a rule discovery task. Thinking and Reasoning, 15, 294-315.
13. Gorman, M. E. (1986). How the possibility of error affects falsification on a task that models scientific problem-solving. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 85-96.
14. Gorman, M. E., & Gorman, M. E. (1984). A comparison of disconfirmatory, confirmatory and control strategies on Wason's 2-4-6 task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 629-648.
15. Gorman, M. E., Gorman, M. E., Latta R. M., & Cunningham, G. (1984). How disconfirmatory, confirmatory and combined strategies affect group problem solving. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 65-79.
16. Gorman, M. E., Stafford, A., & Gorman, M. E. (1987). Disconfirmation and dual hypotheses on a more difficult version of Wason's 2,4,6 task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 1-28.
17. Green, D. W. (1990). Confirmation bias, problem-solving and cognitive models. In J-P. Caverni, J-M. Fabre, & M. Gonzalez (Eds.), Cognitive biases. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
18. Kareev, Y., Halberstadt, N., & Shafir, D. (1993). Improving performance and increasing the use of non-positive testing in a rule-discovery task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 729-742.
19. Klayman, J., & Ha, Y-W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211-228.
20. Klayman, J., & Ha, Y-W. (1989). Hypothesis testing in rule discovery: Strategy, structure, and content. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 596-604.
21. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A.Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91-105). London: Cambridge University Press.
23. Lin, W-L., & Lien, Y-W. (2001). How to discover a rule: Investigating the advantages of alternative hypothesis and dual-hypothesis testing strategy [in Chinese]. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 9, 299-322.
24. Lin, W-L., Lien, Y-W., & Jen, C-H. (2005). Is the more the better? The role of divergent thinking in creative problem solving [in Chinese]. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 47, 211-227.
25. Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232.
26. Mynatt, C. R., Doherty, M. E., & Tweney, R. D. (1977). Confirmation bias in a simulated research environment: An experimental study of scientific inference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 85-95.
27. Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1994). Another look at eliminative and enumerative behavior in a conceptual task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 149-169.
28. Ohlsson, S. (1984). Restructuring revisited: II. An information processing theory of restructuring and insight. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 25, 117-129.
29. Penner, D., & Klahr, D. (1996). When to trust the evidence: Further investigations of the effects of system error on the Wason 2-4-6 task. Memory & Cognition, 24, 655-668.
30. Platt, J. R. (1964). Strong inference. Science, 146, 347-353.
31. Poletiek, F. H. (1996). Paradoxes of falsification. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 447-462.
32. Poletiek, F. H. (2001). Hypothesis testing behavior. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
33. Poletiek, F. H. (2004). The proof of the pudding is in the eating: Translating Popper's philosophy into a model for testing behaviour. In K. I. Manktelow & M. C. Chung (Eds.), Psychology of reasoning: Historical and philosophical approaches (pp. 333-347). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
34. Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.
35. Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and prediction: An analysis of the foundations and the structure of knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
36. Skov, R. B., & Sherman, S. J. (1986). Information-gathering processes: Diagnosticity, hypothesis-confirmatory strategies, and perceived hypothesis confirmation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 293-121.
37. Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22.
38. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. The Behavioral and Brain Science, 23, 645-726.
39. Tukey, D. D. (1986). A philosophical and empirical analysis of participants' modes of inquiry in Wason's 2-4-6-task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 5-33.
40. Tweney, R. D., Doherty, M. E.,Worner, W. J., Pliske, D. B., Mynatt, C. R., Gross, K. A., et al. (1980). Strategies of rule discovery in an inference task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32A, 109-123.
41. Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Austin, N. G., & Rankin, S. (1995). Inducing a rule in Wason's 2-4-6 task: A test of the information-quantity and goal-complementarity hypotheses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 895-914.
42. Vallée-Tourangeau, F., & Payton, T. (2008). Graphical representation fosters discovery in the 2-4-6 task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61A, 625-640.
43. Vallée-Tourangeau, F., & Penney, A. K. (2005). The impact of external representation in a rule discovery task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 820-834.
44. Vartanian, O., Martindale, C., & Kwiatkowski, J. (2003). Creativity and inductive reasoning: The relationship between divergent thinking and performance on Wason's 2-4-6 task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 641-655.
45. Wagner, C. (1996). Creative behavior through basic inferences: Evidence from person-computer interactions. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 105-125.
46. Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
47. Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129-140.
48. Wason, P. C. (1966). Reasoning. In B.M. Foss (Ed.), New horizons in psychology (pp. 135-151). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
49. Wason, P. C. (1977). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses: A second look. In P. N. Johnson-Laird & P. C. Wason (Eds.), Thinking: Readings in cognitive science (pp. 293-306). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50. Wetherick, N. E. (1962). Eliminative and enumerative behaviour in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 246-249.
51. Wharton, C. M., Cheng, P. W., & Wickens, T. D. (1993). Hypothesis-testing strategies: Why two goals are better than one. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 743-758.
52. Wu, T-Y., Wu, M-H., & Horng, R-Y. (1998). The effects of collaboration, giving explanation, and guiding questions on inductive reasoning [in Chinese]. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 40, 117-136.