The functional benefits of tilt adaptation

Seeing and Perceiving

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 37-51

  Kristjánsson, Árni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

Author keywords

ADAPTATION; PRIMING; SPATIAL VISION; TILT AFTEREFFECT

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADAPTATION TIME; CLOCK WISE; COUNTER-CLOCKWISE; PRIMING; RESPONSE CHARACTERISTIC; SINUSOIDAL GRATING; SPATIAL VISION; TILT AFTEREFFECT; VISUAL SYSTEMS;

EXPERIMENTS;

ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; TILT TABLE TEST; VISION; VISUAL ADAPTATION;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; POSTURE; TILT-TABLE TEST;

EID: 79957999982     PISSN: 18784755     EISSN: 18784763     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/187847511X555283     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abbonizio, G., Langley, K. and Clifford, C. W. G. (2002). Contrast adaptation may enhance contrast discrimination, Spatial Vision 16, 45-58.
2. Anstis, S., Verstraten, F. and Mather, G. (1998). The motion aftereffect, Trends Cognit. Sci. 2, 111-117. (Pubitemid 28396474)
3. Attneave, F. (1954). Some informational aspects of visual perception, Psycholog. Rev. 61, 183-193.
4. Barlow, H. and Földiák, P. (1989). Adaptation and decorrelation in the cortex, in:The Computing Neuron , R. Durkin, C. Miall and G. Hutchison (Eds), pp. 54-72. Addison Wesley, Boston, USA.
5. Bex, P. J., Beddingham, S. and Hammett, S. T. (1999). Apparent speed and speed sensitivity during adaptation to motion, J. Optic. Soc. Amer. 16, 2817-2824. (Pubitemid 129617523)
6. Blakemore, C. and Campbell, F. W. (1969). On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images, J. Physiol. 203, 237-260.
7. Blakemore, C., Muncey, J. P. J. and Ridley, R. M. (1973). Stimulus specificity in the human visual system, Vision Research 13, 1915-1931.
8. Bradley, A., Switkes, E. and DeValois, K. (1988). Orientation and spatial frequency selectivity of adaptation to color and luminance gratings, Vision Research 28, 841-856.
9. Clifford, C. W. G. (2007). Functional ideas about adaptation applied to spatial and motion vision, in:Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and After-effects in High-Level Vision , C. W. G. Clifford and G. Rhodes (Eds), pp. 47-82. Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
10. Clifford, C. W. G. and Langley, K. (1996). Psychophysics of motion adaptation parallels insect electrophysiology, Curr. Biol. 1, 1340-1342. (Pubitemid 27004920)
11. Clifford, C. W. G. and Rhodes, G. (2007). Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and After-effects in High-Level Vision. Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
12. Clifford, C. W. G., Wenderoth, P. and Spehar, B. (2000). A functional angle on some after-effects in cortical vision, Proc. Royal Soc. London B 267, 1705-1710.
13. Clifford, C. W. G., Ma Wyatt, A., Arnold, D. H., Smith, S. T. and Wenderoth, P. (2001). Orthogonal adaptation improves orientation discrimination, Vision Research 41, 151-159. (Pubitemid 32332840)
14. Clifford, C. W. G., Webster, M. A., Stanley, G. B., Stocker, A. A., Kohn, A., Sharpee, T. O. and Schwartz, O. (2007). Visual adaptation: neural, psychological and computational aspects, Vision Research 47, 3125-3131. (Pubitemid 350060972)
15. Cornsweet, T. N. (1970). Visual Perception. Academic Press, New York, USA.
16. Dragoi, V., Sharma, J., Miller, E. K. and Sur, M. (2002). Dynamics of neuronal sensitivity in visual cortex and local feature discrimination, Nature Neurosci. 5, 883-891. (Pubitemid 34976654)
17. Durgin, F. H. (1996). Visual aftereffect of texture density contingent on color of frame, Percept. Psychophys. 58, 207-223.
18. Geng, J. J., Eger, E., Ruff, C., Kristjánsson, Á., Rothstein, P. and Driver, J. (2006). On-line attentional selection from competing stimuli in opposite visual fields: effects on human visual cortex and control processes, J. Neurophysiol. 96, 2601-2612. (Pubitemid 44785909)
19. Gibson, J. J. (1937). Adaptation with negative aftereffect, Psycholog. Rev. 44, 222-224.
20. Gibson, J. J. and Radner, M. (1937). Adaptation, aftereffect, and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies, J. Exper. Psychol. 20, 453-467.
21. Goldstein, A. G. (1959). Judgements of visual velocity as a function of length of observation, J. Exper. Psychol. 54, 457-461.
22. Graham, N. V. S. (1989). Visual Pattern Analyzers. Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
23. Greenlee, M. W. and Heitger, F. (1988). The functional role of contrast adaptation, Vision Research 28, 791-797.
24. Hammett, S. T., Snowden, R. J. and Smith, A. T. (1994). Perceived contrast as a function of adaptation duration, Vision Research 34, 31-40.
25. Heeley, D. W. and Buchanan-Smith, H. M. (1990). Recognition of stimulus orientation, Vision Research 30, 1429-1437. (Pubitemid 20278691)
26. Helson, H. (1947). Adaptation-level as frame of reference for prediction of psychophysical data, Amer. J. Psychol. 60, 1-29.
27. Helson, H. (1948). Adaptation-level as a basis for a quantitative theory of frames of reference, Psycholog. Rev. 55, 297-313.
28. Helson, H. (1964a). Current trends and issues in adaptation-level theory, Amer. Psycholog. 19, 26-38.
29. Helson, H. (1964b). Adaptation-Level Theory: An Experimental and Systematic Approach to Behavior. Harper and Row, Publishers, New York, USA.
30. Hoffman, D. D. and Richards, W. A. (1984). Parts of recognition, Cognition 18, 65-96.
31. Hoffman, D. D. and Singh, M. (1997). Salience of visual parts, Cognition 63, 29-78. (Pubitemid 127450466)
32. Hurvich, L. M. (1981). Color Vision. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.
33. Kingdom, F. and Moulden, B. (1988). Border effects on brightness: a review of findings, models and issues, Spatial Vision 3, 225-262.
34. Kristjánsson, Á. (2001). Increased sensitivity to speed changes during adaptation to first-order, but not to second-order motion, Vision Research 41, 1825-1832. (Pubitemid 32429540)
35. Kristjánsson, Á. (2008). 'I know what you did on the last trial' - a selective review of research on priming in visual search, Frontiers Biosci. 13, 1171-1181. (Pubitemid 351594757)
36. Kristjánsson, A. and Campana, G. (2010). Where perception meets memory: a review of priming in visual search, Attention, Percept. Psychophys. 72, 5-18.
37. Kristjánsson, A. and Tse, P. U. (2001). Curvature discontinuities are cues for rapid shape analysis, Percept. Psychophys. 63, 390-403.
38. Kristjánsson, A., Vuilleumier, P., Schwartz, S., Macaluso, E. and Driver, J. (2007). Neural basis for priming of pop-out revealed with fMRI, Cerebral Cortex 17, 1612-1624.
39. Land, E. H. (1974). The retinex theory of colour vision, Proc. Royal Inst. Great Britain 47, 23-58.
40. Ledgeway, T. and Smith, A. T. (1997). Changes in perceived speed following adaptation to first-order and second-order motion, Vision Research 37, 215-224. (Pubitemid 27029201)
41. Mather, G. and Harris, J. (1998). Theoretical models of the motion aftereffect, in:The Motion Aftereffect: A Modern Perspective , G. Mather, F. Verstraten and S. Anstis (Eds), pp. 157-185. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
42. Nachmias, J. (2006). The role of virtual standards in visual discrimination, Vision Research 46, 2456-2464.
43. O'Toole, B. and Wenderoth, P. (1977). The tilt illusion: repulsion and attraction effects in the oblique meridian, Vision Research 17, 367-374. (Pubitemid 8101053)
44. Pantle, A. and Sekuler, R. (1968). Size-detecting mechanisms in human vision, Science 162, 1146-1148.
45. Regan, D. (2000). Human Perception of Objects. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.
46. Regan, D. and Beverley, K. I. (1985). Postadaptation orientation discrimination, J. Optic. Soc. Amer. A 2, 147-155.
47. Rhodes, G., Watson, T. L., Jeffery, L. and Clifford, C. W. G. (2010). Perceptual adaptation helps us identify faces, Vision Research 50, 963-968.
48. Sigurdardóttir, H. M., Kristjánsson, Á. and Driver, J. (2008). Repetition streaks increase perceptual sensitivity in brief visual search displays, Visual Cognition 16, 643-658. (Pubitemid 351958847)
49. Simoncelli, E. P. and Olshausen, B. A. (2001). Natural image statistics and neural representation, Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 1193-1216. (Pubitemid 32695258)
50. Thompson, P. (1981). Velocity aftereffects: the effects of adaptation to moving stimuli on the perception on subsequently seen moving stimuli, Vision Research 21, 337-345. (Pubitemid 11143363)
51. Ullman, S. and Schechtman, G. (1982). Adaptation and gain normalization, Proc. Royal Soc. London Series B, Biolog. Sci. 216, 299-313. (Pubitemid 13232388)
52. Wainwright, M. J. (1999). Visual adaptation as optimal information transmission, Vision Research 39, 3960-3974. (Pubitemid 29378319)
53. Wainwright, M. J., Schwartz, O. and Simoncelli, E. P. (2002). Natural image statistics and divisive normalization: modeling nonlinearities and adaptation in cortical neurons, in:Statistical Theories of the Brain , P. Rao Olshausen and M. Lewicki (Eds), pp. 203-222. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
54. Ware, C. and Mitchell, D. E. (1974). The spatial selectivity of the tilt aftereffect, Vision Research 14, 735-737.
55. Wenderoth, P. and Johnstone, R. (1988). The different mechanisms of the direct and indirect tilt illusions, Vision Research 28, 301-312. (Pubitemid 18042699)
56. Wenderoth, P. and van der Zwan, R. (1989). The effects of exposure duration and surrounding frames on direct and indirect tilt aftereffects and illusions, Percept. Psychophys. 46, 338-344. (Pubitemid 19234906)
57. Westheimer, G. (1977). Spatial frequency and light spread descriptions of visual acuity and hyperacuity, J. Optic. Soc. Amer. 67, 207-212.
58. Wolfe, J. M. (1984). Short test flashes produce large tilt aftereffects, Vision Research 24, 1959-1964. (Pubitemid 15191674)
59. Wolfe, J. M. and O'Connell, K. M. (1986). Fatigue and structural change: two consequences of visual pattern adaptation, Investig. Opthalmol. Visual Sci. 27, 538-543. (Pubitemid 16116300)