Does it matter if a computer jokes?

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 77-86

  Khooshabeh, Peter ^a   Gratch, Jonathan ^a   McCall, Cade ^b   Blascovich, James ^c   Gandhe, Sudeep ^a  

^a University of Southern California   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Humor; Joy of use; Natural language processing; Ontology; Persuasion; Social influence; Virtual agents

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

HUMOR; JOY OF USE; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NATURAL LANGUAGES; ONTOLOGY'S; PERSUASION; PROBLEM-SOLVING; SOCIAL INFLUENCE; VIRTUAL AGENT;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 79957961117     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1979742.1979604     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Articles published in Humor, 1988-2009. International Society for Humor Studies, Journal of Humor Research, 2011. http://www.hnu.edu/ishs/ISHSDocuments/ Humor1988-2009.pdf.
2. Cialdini, R.B. Influence: the psychology of persuasion. Harper Collins, New York, NY, 2007.
3. Clouse, R.W. and Spurgeon, K.L. Corporate analysis of humor. Psychology: A journal of human behavior 32, (1995), 1-24. (Pubitemid 126043236)
4. Gandhe, S., DeVault, D., Roque, A., et al. From domain specification to virtual humans: an integrated approach to authoring tactical questioning characters. Proceedings of Interspeech, (2008).
5. Gandhe, S., Whitman, N., Traum, D., and Artstein, R. An integrated authoring tool for tactical questioning dialogue systems. Proceedings of 6th Workshop on Knowledge and Reasoning in Practical Dialogue Systems, (2009).
6. Hall, J. NASA Moon Survival Task: The original consensus exercise. Teleometrics International, The Woodlands, TX, 1989.
7. Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Terveen, L.G., and Riedl, J.T. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 22, 1 (2004), 5-53.
8. Kang, S., Watt, J.H., and Ala, S.K. Social copresence in anonymous social interaction using a mobile video telephone. Proceeding of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2008), 1535-1544.
9. Martin, R.A. The psychology of humor: an integrative approach. Elsevier Academic Press, London, 2007.
10. Mettee, D.R., Hrelec, E.S., and Wilkens, P.C. Humor as an interpersonal asset and liability. The Journal of Social Psychology 85, 1, 51-64.
11. Morkes, J., Kernal, H.K., and Nass, C. Effects of humor in task-oriented human-computer interaction and computer-mediated communication: a direct test of SRCT theory. Human-Computer Interaction 14, 4 (1999), 395-435. (Pubitemid 30558575)
12. O'Quinn, K. and Aronoff, J. Humor as a technique of social influence. Social Psychology Quarterly 44, 4 (1981), 349-357.
13. Watson, D., Tellegen, A., and Clark, L.A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affects: The PANAS scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, (1988), 1063-1070.
14. Yin, L., T. W. Bickmore, and Cortes, D.E. The impact of linguistic and cultural congruity on persuasion by conversational agents. Proceedings of IVA, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer (2010), 343-349.
15. Zhang, Y. Responses to humorous advertising: the moderating effect of need for cognition. The Journal of Advertising 25, 1 (1996), 15-32.