Marginal bone loss in relation to the implant neck surface: An update

Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 365-368

  Aloy Prósper, Amparo ^a   Maestre Ferrín, Laura ^a   Peñarrocha Oltra, David ^a   Peñarrocha Diago, María ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bone loss; Dental implants; Machined neck; Polished neck; Rough neck

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPLANT; MACHINED NECK IMPLANT; OSTEOLYSIS; POLISHED NECK IMPLANT; ROUGH NECK IMPLANT; SURVIVAL RATE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; HUMANS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 79957954064     PISSN: 16984447     EISSN: 16986946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.16.e365     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Peñarrocha M, Palomar M, Sanchis JM, Guarinos J, Balaguer J. Radiologic study of marginal bone loss around 108 dental implants and its relationship to smoking, implant location, and morphology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:861-867.
2. Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Gröndahl K, Engquist E, Feld-mann H. Astra Tech and Brånemark system implants: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:413-420.
3. Lee DW, Choi YS, Park KH, Kim CS, Moon IS. Effect of micro-thread on the maintenance of marginal bone level: a 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:465-470.
4. Piao CM, Lee JE, Koak J Y, Kim SK, Rhyu IC, Han CH, et al. Marginal bone loss around three different implant systems: radiographic evaluation after 1 year. J Oral Rehabil. 2009;36:748-754.
5. Norton MR. Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro- and micro-structure. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998;9:91-99.
6. Nickenig HJ, Wichmann M, Schlegel KA, Nkenke E, Eitner S. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone levels adjacent to parallel-screw cylinder machined-neck implants and rough-surfaced micro-threaded implants using digitized panoramic radiographs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:550-554.
7. Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Engquist E, Feldmann H, Gröndahl K. Astra Tech and Brånemark System implants: a prospective 5-year comparative study. Results after one year. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 1999;1:17-26.
8. Puchades-Roman L, Palmer RM, Palmer PJ, Howe LC, Ide M, Wilson RF. A clinical, radiographic, and microbiologic comparison of Astra Tech and Brånemark single tooth implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000;2:78-84.
9. Van Steenberghe D, De Mars G, Quirynen M, Jacobs R, Naert I. A prospective split-mouth comparative study of two screw-shaped self-tapping pure titanium implant systems. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11:202-209.
10. Bratu EA, Tandlich M, Shapira L. A rough surface implant neck with micro threads reduces the amount of marginal bone loss: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:827-832.
11. Hürzeler M, Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel HC. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments: preliminary data from a prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:33-39.
12. Prosper L, Redaelli S, Pasi M, Zarone F, Radaelli G, Gherlone EF. A randomized prospective multicenter trial evaluating the platform-switching technique for the prevention of postrestorative cre-stal bone loss. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:299-308.
13. Vigolo P, Givani A. Platform-switched restorations on wide-diameter implants: a 5-year clinical prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:103-109.
14. Astrand P, Engquist B, Anzén B, Bergendal T, Hallman M, Karls-son U, et al. Non submerged and submerged implants in the treatment of the partially edentulous maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2002;4:115-127.
15. Cecchinato D, Bengazi F, Blasi G, Botticelli D, Cardarelli I, Gua-lini F. Bone level alterations at implants placed in the posterior segments of the dentition: outcome of submerged/non-submerged healing. A 5-year multi center, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:429-431.
16. Cecchinato D, Olsson C, Lindhe J. Submerged or non-submerged healing of endosseous implants to be used in the rehabilitation of partially dentate patients. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31:299-308.
17. Karlsson U, Gotfredsen K, Olsson C. A 2-year report on maxillary and mandibular fxed partial dentures supported by Astra Tech dental implants. A comparison of 2 implants with different surface textures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998;9:235-242.
18. Hallman M, Mordenfeld A, Strandkvist T. A retrospective 5-year follow-up study of two different titanium implant surfaces used after interpositional bone grafting for reconstruction of the atrophic edentulous maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7:121-126.
19. Brägger U, Häfeli U, Huber B, Hämmerle CH, Lang NP. Evaluation of post surgical crestal bone levels adjacent to non-submerged dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998;9:218-224.
20. Cosyn J, Sabzevar MM, De Wilde P, De Rouck T. Two-piece implants with turned versus microtextured collars. J Periodontol. 2007;78:1657-1663.