Decide your time: Testing deterrence theory's certainty and celerity effects on substance-using probationers

Journal of Criminal Justice

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 261-267

  O'Connell, Daniel ^a   Visher, Christy A ^a   Martin, Steven ^a   Parker, Laurin ^a   Brent, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Deterrence; Probation; Substance use

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957949620     PISSN: 00472352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.02.011     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Beccaria C. On crimes and punishment 1764, Trans by Paolucci, Bobbs-Merrill, H. IN.
2. Bentham J. An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation 1970, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
3. Boyum D., Kleiman M. Alcohol and Other Drugs. Crime 1995, ICS Press, San Francisco. J.Q. Wilson, J. Petersilia (Eds.).
4. Caputo G.A. Intermediate sanctions in corrections 2004, University of North Texas Press, Denton.
5. CESAR Oregon STOP program for probationers 1994, University of Maryland, College Park.
6. Deschenes E.P., Turner S., Greenwood P.W. Drug court or probation? An experimental evaluation of Maricopa County"s drug court. Justice System Journal 1995, 18:55-73.
7. Glaze L.E., Bonczar T.P. Probation and parole in the United States, 2008 2009, U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, D.C.
8. Gottfredson M., Hirschi T. A general theory of crime 1990, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
9. Grasmack H.G., Bryjak G.J. The deterrent effect of perceived severity ofpunishment. Social Forces 1980, 59:471-491.
10. Harrell A., Kleiman M.A. Drug testing in criminal justice settings. Treatment of drug offenders: Policies and Issues 2000, Springer Publishing. C. Leukefeld, F. Tims (Eds.).
11. Harrell A.V., Mitchell O., Merrill J., Marlowe D. Evaluation of Breaking the Cycle Final Report. Report to the National Institute of Justice 2002, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC.
12. Harrell A., Roman J. Reducing drug use and crime among offenders: The impact of graduated sanctions. Journal of Drug Issues 2001, 31:207-232.
13. Hawken A., Kleiman M. Hawaii's swift and sure probation 2008, US Dept. of Justice: NIJ.
14. Hawken A., Kleiman M. Managing drug involved probationers with swift and certain sanctions: Evaluating Hawaii's HOPE 2009, US Dept. of Justice: NIJ.
15. Hawken, A., & Mark, K. (2007). What a novel probation program in Hawaii might teach other states. The American Prospect, April 10.
16. Inciardi J., Martin S., Butzin C., Hooper R., Harrison L. An effective model of prison-based treatment for drug-involved offenders. Journal of Drug Issues 1997, 27:261-278.
17. Kennedy D. Pulling levers: Getting deterrence right. National Institute of Justice Journal 1998, 236:2-8.
18. Kilmer B. The Future of DIRECT Surveillance: Drug and alcohol use Information from REmote and Continuous Testing. Journal of Drug Policy Analysis 2008, 1:1-11.
19. Kleiman M.A. Crackdowns: The effects of intensive enforcement on retail heroin dealing. Street Level Drug Enforcement: Examining the issues 1988, M.R. Chaiken (Ed.).
20. Kleiman M.A., Tran T.H., Fishbein P., Magula M.T., Allen W., Lacy G. Opportunities and barriers in probation reform: A case study of drug testing and sanctions 2003, University of California, California Policy Research Center, Berkeley.
21. Minton T.D., Sabol W.J. Jail Inmates at Midyear 2008 - Statistical Tables 2009, Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC.
22. Nagin D.S. Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century. Crime and justice: A review of research 1998, University of Chicago Press. M. Tonry (Ed.).
23. Paternoster R. The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues. Justice Quarterly 1987, 4:173-217.
24. Paternoster R. Decisions to participate in and desist from four types of common delinquency: Deterrence and the rational choice perspective. Law and Society Review 1989, 23:7-40.
25. Petersilia J.R. Parole and prisoner reentry in the United States. Prisons 1999, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. M. Tonry, J.R. Petersilia (Eds.).
26. Petersilia J.R., Turner S. Intensive Probation and Parole. Crime and Justice 1993, Vol. 17:281-335.
27. Roman J.K., Yahner J., Zweig J. How do Drug Courts Work. Presentation at theannual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, San Francisco, CA. November 19, 2010 2010.
28. Taxman F.S. Controlling drug use and crime among drug-involved offenders: Testing, sanctions, and treatment. Drug Addiction and Drug Policy 1999, Harvard University Press. P.H. Heymann, W.N. Brownsberger (Eds.).
29. Taxman F.S. Unraveling 'What Works' for Offenders in Substance Abuse Treatment Services. National Drug Court Institute Review 2000, 2:93-133.
30. Taxman F.S. Supervision - exploring the dimensions of effectiveness. Federal Probation 2002, 66:14-27.
31. Taxman F.S., Soule D., Gelb A. Graduated sanctions: Stepping into accountable systems and offenders. Prison Journal 1999, 79:182-205.
32. Vold G.B., Bernard T.J., Snipes J.B. Theoretical Criminology 1998, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
33. West H.C., Sabol W.J. Prison Inmates and Mid-Year 2008, Special Report, NCJ 225619 2009, Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington D.C.
34. Wright V. Deterrence in criminal justice: Evaluating certainty vs. severity of punishment 2010, The Sentencing Project, Washington D.C.