Morphological and physiological characterization of two new pineapple somaclones derived from in vitro culture

In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology - Plant

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 428-433

  Pérez, Guillermo ^a   Mbogholi, Andrew ^a   Sagarra, Fernando ^a   Aragón, Carlos ^a   González, Justo ^a   Isidrón, Miriam ^a   Lorenzo, Joś Carlos ^a  

^a Universidad de Ciego de Avila   (Cuba)

Author keywords

Ananas comosus (L.) Merr.; Leaf morphology; Phenotype variation; Physiology

Indexed keywords

ANANAS COMOSUS;

EID: 79957939207     PISSN: 10545476     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11627-011-9342-y     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aversano R.; Savarese; De Nova J. M.; Frusciante L.; Punzo M.; Carputo D. Genetic stability at nuclear and plastid DNA level in regenerated plants of Solanum species and hybrids. Euphytica 165: 353-361; 2009. doi: 10. 1007/s10681-008-9797-z.
2. Barandalla L.; Ritter E.; Ruiz De Galarreta J. I. Oryzalin treatment of potato diploids yields tetraploid and chimeric plants from which euploids could be derived by callus induction. Potato Res 10: 143-154; 2006.
3. Bhatia P.; Ashwath N.; Senaratna T.; Krauss S. Genetic analysis of cotyledon-derived regenerants of tomato using AFLP markers. Curr Sci 88: 280-284; 2005.
4. Botella J. R.; Fairbairn D. J. Present and future potential of pineapple biotechnology. Acta Hort 666: 23-28; 2005.
5. Bouman H.; De Klerk G. J. Measurement of the extent of somaclonal variation in begonia plants regenerated under various conditions. Comparison of three assays. Theor Appl Genet 102: 111-117; 2001. doi: 10. 1007/s001220051625.
6. Brown P. T. H.; Lange F. D.; Kranz E.; Lorz H. Analysis of single protoplasts and regenerated plants by PCR and RAPD technology. Mol Gen Genet 237: 311-317; 1993.
7. Cabot C.; Lacoevilhe J. C. A genetic hybridization programme for improving pineapple quality. Acta Hort 275: 395-400; 1990.
8. Cardoza V.; Stewart N. C. Brassica biotechnology: progress in cellular and molecular biology. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 40: 542-551; 2004.
9. Carlier J. D.; Coppens d'Eeckenbrugge G.; Leitão J. M. Pineapple. In: Kole C. (ed) Genome mapping and molecular breeding in plants, vol. 4. Fruits and nuts. Springer-Verlag Berlin & Heidelberg, Germany, pp 331-342; 2007.
10. Castillo N. F.; Bassil N. V.; Wada S.; Reed B. M. Genetic stability of criopreserved shoot tips of Rubus germplasm. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 46: 246-256; 2010.
11. Chen J.; Henny R. J.; Devanand P. S.; Chao C. T. AFLP analysis of nephthytis (Syngonium podophyllum Schott) selected from somaclonal variants. Plant Cell Rep 24: 743-749; 2006.
12. Dewald M. G.; Moore G. A.; Sherman W. B.; Evans M. H. Production of pineapple plants in vitro. Plant Cell Rep 7: 535-537; 1988.
13. Espinosa P.; Lorenzo J. C.; Iglesias A.; Yabor L.; Menéndez E.; Borroto J.; Hernández L.; Arencibia A. D. Production of pineapple transgenic plants assisted by temporary immersion bioreactors. Plant Cell Rep 21: 136-140; 2002.
14. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAOSTAT) (2010) FAO statistic division. http://faostat. fao. org/site/567/DesktopDefault. aspx?PageID=567. Accessed 31August.
15. s. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 72: 221-227; 2003.
16. Fourré J. L.; Berger P.; Niquet L.; André P. Somatic embryogenesis and somaclonal variation in Norway spruce: morphogenetic, cytogenetic and molecular approaches. Theor Appl Genet 94: 159-169; 1997. doi: 10. 1007/s001220050395.
17. García-Sánchez F.; Syvertsen J. P.; Gimeno V.; Botía P.; Perez-Perez J. G. Responses to flooding and drought stress by two citrus rootstock seedlings with different water-use efficiency. Physiol Plant 130: 532-542; 2007.
18. Guo W. L.; Gong L.; Ding Z. F.; Li Y. D.; Li F. X.; Zhao S. P.; Liu B. Genomic instability in phenotypically normal regenerants of medicinal plant Codonopsis lanceolata Benth. et Hook. as revealed by ISSR and RAPD markers. Plant Cell Rep 25: 896-906; 2006. doi: 10. 1007/s00299-006-0131-8.
19. Jain S. M. Tissue culture-derived variation in crop improvement. Euphytica 118: 153-166; 2001.
20. Johansen D. A. Plant microtechnique. McGraw-Hill Books, New York, NY, USA, p 528; 1940.
21. Larkin P. J.; Scowcroft W. R. Somaclonal variation-a novel source of variability from cell culture for plant improvement. Theor Appl Genet 60: 197-214; 1981.
22. Li R.; Qu R.; Bruneau A. H.; Livingston D. P. Selection for freezing tolerance in St. Augustine grass through somaclonal variation and germplasm evaluation. Plant Breed 129: 417-421; 2010.
23. Lii J. L.; Rosa-Márquez E.; Lizard E. Smooth leaf (spineless) Red Spanish pineapple (Ananas comosus) propagated in vitro. J Agric Univ P R 73: 15-17; 1989.
24. Martins M.; Sarmento D.; Oliveira M. M. Genetic stability of micropropagated almond plantlets, as assessed by RAPD and ISSR markers. Plant Cell Rep 23: 492-496; 2004. doi: 10. 1007/s00299-004-0870-3.
25. Palombi M. A.; Lombardo B.; Caboni E. In vitro regeneration of wild pear (Pyrus pyraster Burgsd) clones tolerant to Fe-chlorosis and somaclonal variation analysis by RAPD markers. Plant Cell Rep 26: 489-496; 2007. doi: 10. 1007/s00299-006-0256-9.
26. Pérez G.; Yanez E.; Isidrón M.; Lorenzo J. C. Phenotypic and AFLP characterization of two new pineapple somaclones derived from in vitro culture. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 96: 113-116; 2009.
27. Piccioni E.; Barcaccia G.; Falcinelli M.; Standardi A. Estimating somaclonal variation in axillary branching propagation and indirect somatic embryogenesis by RAPD fingerprinting. Int J Plant Sci 158: 556-562; 1997. doi: 10. 1086/297467.
28. Porra R. J. The chequered history of the development and use of simultaneous equations for the accurate determination of chlorophylls a and b. Photosynth Res 73: 149-156; 2002.
29. Prado M. J.; González M. V.; Romo S.; Herrera M. T. Adventitious plant regeneration on leaf explants from adult male kiwifruit and AFLP analysis of genetic variation. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult 88: 1-10; 2007.
30. Price A.; Cairns J.; Horton P.; Jones H. G.; Griffiths H. Linking drought-resistance mechanisms to drought avoidance in upland rice using a QTL approach: progress and new opportunities to integrate stomatal and mesophyll responses. J Exp Bot 53: 989-1004; 2002.
31. Py C.; Lacoeuilhe J. J.; Teisson C. The pineapple: cultivation and uses. Editions GP. Maisonneuve & Larose, Paris, France; 1987.
32. 2 concentration on photochemistry efficiency of cucumber seedlings. J Integr Plant Biol 50: 1307-1317; 2008.
33. Rival A.; Bertrand L.; Beale T.; Combes M. C.; Touslot P.; Leshermes P. Suitability of RAPD analysis for detection of somaclonal variation in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Plant Breed 117: 73-76; 1998. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1439-0523. 1998. tb01451. x.
34. Sharma S. K.; Bryan G. J.; WinWeld M. O.; Millam S. Stability of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plants regenerated via somatic embryos, axillary bud proliferated shoots, microtubers and true potato seeds: a comparative phenotypic, cytogenetic and molecular assessment. Planta 226: 1449-1458; 2007. doi: 10. 1007/s00425-007-0583-2.
35. Smulders M. J.; Rus-Kortekaas W.; Gilissen L. J. W. Natural variation in patterns of polysomaty among individual tomato plants and their regenerated progeny. Plant Sci 106: 129-139; 1995. doi: 10. 1016/0168-9452(95)04082-6.
36. Sripaoraya S.; Keawsompong S.; Insupa P.; Davey M. R.; Power J. B.; Srinives P. Evaluation of transgene stability, gene expression and herbicide tolerance of genetically modified pineapple under field conditions. Acta Hort 702: 37-40; 2006.
37. Sripaoraya S.; Marchant R.; Power J. B.; Davey M. R. Herbicide-tolerant transgenic pineapple (Ananas comosus) produced by microprojectile bombardment. Ann Bot 88: 597-603; 2001.
38. Wakasa K. (1977) Use of tissue culture for propagation and mutant induction in Ananas comosus. Nat Inst Agr Sc Annual Report. Tokyo, Japan.
39. Wakasa K. (1989) Pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr). In: Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry. Bajaj YPS (ed). Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
40. Yabor L.; Valle B.; Carvajal C.; Aragón C.; Hernández M.; González J.; Daquinta M.; Arencibia A.; Lorenzo J. C. Characterization of a field-grown transgenic pineapple clone containing the genes chitinase, AP24, and bar. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant; 2009. doi: 10. 1007/s11627-009-9245-3.