A new approach for weight derivation using data envelopment analysis in the analytic hierarchy process

Journal of the Operational Research Society

Volumn 62, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1585-1595

  Mirhedayatian, S M ^a   Farzipoor Saen, R ^b  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

analytic hierarchy process; data envelopment analysis; DEAHP; rank reversal

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP); DEAHP; DECISION MAKERS; NEW APPROACHES; PAIRWISE COMPARISON MATRICES; PRIORITY VECTOR; RANK REVERSALS;

MATRIX ALGEBRA;

EID: 79957939200     PISSN: 01605682     EISSN: 14769360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/jors.2010.105     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Andersen P and Petersen NC (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Mngt Sci 39: 1261-1264.
2. Charnes A, Cooper WW and Rhodes EL (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Opl Res 2: 429-444. (Pubitemid 9402758)
3. Chu ATW, Kalaba RE and Spingarn K (1979). A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets. J Optimiz Theory App 27: 531-538. (Pubitemid 9456920)
4. Cogger KO and Yu PL (1985). Eigenweight vectors and leastdistance approximation for revealed preference in pairwise weight ratios. J Optimiz Theory App 46: 483-491. (Pubitemid 15549690)
5. Cooper W, Seiford L and Tone K (2000). Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston.
6. Crawford GB (1987). The geometric mean procedure for estimating the scale of a judgment matrix. Math Modelling 9: 327-334.
7. Gass SI and Rapcsak T (2004). Singular value decomposition in AHP. Eur J Opl Res 154: 573-584.
8. Islei G and Lockett AG (1988). Judgemental modelling based on geometric least square. Eur J Opl Res 36: 27-35. (Pubitemid 18645466)
9. Lipovetsky S and Conklin WM (2002). Robust estimation of priorities in the AHP. Eur J Opl Res 137: 110-122. (Pubitemid 33126012)
10. Mehrabian S, Jahanshahloo GR, Alirezaee MR and Amin GR (2000). An assurance interval for the non-Archimedean epsilon in DEA models. Opns Res 48: 344-347.
11. Mikhailov L (2000). A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy process. J Opl Res Soc 51: 341-349. (Pubitemid 30566162)
12. Ramanathan R (2006). Data envelopment analysis for weight derivation and aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process. Comput Opl Res 33: 1289-1307. (Pubitemid 41428292)
13. Saaty TL (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill: New York.
14. Saaty TL (2000). Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications: Pittsburgh.
15. Wang YM and Chin KS (2009). A new data envelopment analysis method for priority determination and group decision making in the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Opl Res 195: 239-250.