The cellphone-in-the-countryside: On some of the ironic spatialities of technonatures

Technonatures: Environments, Technologies, Spaces, and Places in the Twenty-first Century

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 85-104

  Michael, Mike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957914452     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Adam, B., U. Beck, and J. Van Loon, eds. 2000. The Risk Society and Beyond. London: Sage.
2. Akrich, M., and B. Latour. 1992. "A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies." In Shaping Technology/Building Society, ed.W.E. Bijker and J. Law: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Amin, A., and N. Thrift. 2002. Cities: Reimagining the Urban. Cambridge: Polity.
4. Bennett, T. 2004. "The Invention of the Modern Cultural Fact: A Critique of the Critique of Everyday Life." In Contemporary Culture and Everyday Life, ed. E. Silva and T. Bennett. Durham: sociologypress.
5. Bijker, W.E. 1995. "Sociohistorical Technology Studies." In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, ed. S. Jasanoff, G.E.Markle, J.C. Peterson, and T. Pinch. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Bull, M. 2000. Sounding Out the City. Oxford: Berg.
7. Carter, S. 2007. Rise and Shine: Sunlight, Technology, and Health. Oxford: Berg.
8. Coggon, D. 2006. "Health Risks from Cell Phone Base Stations." Occupational and Environmental Medicine 63: 298-99.
9. Cooper, G., N. Green, G.M. Murtagh, and R. Harper. 2002. "Mobile Society? Technology, Distance, and Presence." In Virtual Society? Technology, Cyberbole, Reality, ed. S.Woolgar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Day, A. 1996. Romanticism. London: Routledge.
11. de Certeau, M. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12. Gardiner,M. 2000. Critiques of Everyday Life. London and New York: Routledge.
13. Haddon, L. 2004. Information and Communication Technologies in Everyday Life. Oxford: Berg.
14. Haraway, D. 1994. "A Game of Cat's Cradle: Science Studies, Feminist Theory, Cultural Studies." Configurations 2: 59-71.
15. Highmore, B. 2002. Everyday Life and Cultural Theory: An Introduction. London:Routledge.
16. Horst, H.A., and D. Miller. 2006. The Cell Phone: An Anthropology of Communication. Oxford: Berg.
17. Hutter, H.-P., H. Moshammer, P. Wallner, and M. Kundi. 2006. "Subjective Symptoms, Sleeping Problems, and Cognitive Performance in Subjects Living near Mobile Phone Base Stations." Occupational and Environmental Medicine 63: 307-13.
18. Katz, J.E., and S. Sugiyama. 2005. "Mobile Phones as Fashion Statements: The Co-creation of Mobile Communication's Public Meaning." In Mobile Communications: Re-negotiation of the Social, ed. R. Ling, and P. Pederson. New York: Springer.
19. Kern, S. 2003. The Culture of Time and Space, 1880-1918. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
20. Latour, B. 2004. Politics of Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Law, A. 2004."The Social Geometry ofMobile Telephony." Razón y Palabra 24 [online journal]. http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/anteriores/n42/alaw. html#au.
22. Law, J. 2004. "And If the Global Were Small and Noncoherent? Method, Complexity, and the Baroque." Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 22: 13-26.
23. Lefebvre, H. 1974. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
24. Lefebvre, H. 1968. Everyday Life in the Modern World. London: Allen Lane.
25. Lorimer, H., and K. Lund. 2003. "Performing Facts: Finding a Way over Scotland's Mountains." Sociological Review 51, no. S2: 130-44.
26. MacNaghten, P., and J. Urry. 1998. Contested Nature. London: Sage.
27. McGuigan, J. 2004. "Toward a Sociology of the Mobile Phone." Human Technology 1: 45-57.
28. Marsden, B., and C. Smith. 2005. Engineering Empires: A Cultural History of Technology in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
29. Merleau-Ponty, M. 1968. The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
30. Michael, M. 2006. Technoscience and Everyday Life: The Complex Simplicities of the Mundane.Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.
31. Michael, M. 2000. Reconnecting Culture, Technology, and Nature: From Society to Heterogeneity. London: Routledge.
32. Michael, M. 1997. Inoculating Gadgets against Ridicule. Science as Culture 6, no. 2:167-93.
33. Muecke, D.C. 1969. The Compass of Irony. London:Methuen.
34. Nye, D.E. 1994. American Technological Sublime. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Persson, A. 2001. "Intimacy among Strangers: On Mobile Telephone Calls in Public Places." Journal of Mundane Behavior 2, no. 3. http://www.mundanebehavior.org/issues/v2n3/persson.htm.
36. Poster,M. 2002. "Everyday (Virtual) Life." New Literary History 33: 743-60.
37. Serres, M., and B. Latour. 1995. Conversations on Science, Culture, and Time. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
38. Shields, R. 1999. Lefebvre, Love, and Struggle: Spatial Dialectics. London: Routledge.
39. Thomas, K. 1984. Man and the Natural World. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
40. Urry, J. 1990. The Tourist Gaze. London: Sage.
41. Whatmore, S. 2002. Hybrid Geographies. London: Sage.
42. White, D., and C. Wilbert. 2006. "Introduction: Technonatural Time-Space." Science as Culture 15, no. 2: 95-104.
43. Whitehead, A.N. 1978 [1929]. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. New York: Free Press.
44. Wolch, J., and J. Emel, eds. 1998. Animal Geographies: Place, Politics, and Identity in the Nature-Culture Borderlands. London: Verso.