Accuracy of the Omron HEM-705 CP for blood pressure measurement in large epidemiologic studies

Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia

Volumn 96, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 393-398

  Vera Cala, Lina M ^a,b   Orostegui, Myriam ^a   Valencia Angel, Laura I ^a   López, Nahyr ^a   Bautista, Leonelo E ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD INDUSTRIAL DE SANTANDER   (Colombia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Blood pressure; Clinical trials; Epidemiologic studies; Measurement equipment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSCULTATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATA; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSCILLOMETRY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPHYGMOMANOMETER; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AUSCULTATION; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; DIASTOLE; EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX FACTORS; SYSTOLE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79957882776     PISSN: 0066782X     EISSN: 16784170     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0066-782X2011005000038     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Gillman MW, Cook NR. Blood pressure measurement in childhood epidemiological studies. Circulation. 1995;92(4):1049-57.
2. O'Brien E, Atkins N. A comparison of the British Hypertension Society and Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation protocols for validating blood pressure measuring devices: can the two be reconciled? J Hypertens. 1994;12(9):1089-94.
3. Beevers DG, Beevers M. Blood pressure measurement: worsening chaos. J Hum Hypertens. 2000;14(7):415-6.
4. O'Brien E, Waeber B, Parati G, Staessen J, Myers MG. Blood pressure measuring devices: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension. BMJ. 2001;322(7285):531-6.
5. Ni H, Wu C, Prineas R, Shea S, Liu K, Kronmal R, et al. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study. Am J Hypertens. 2006;19(4):353-60.
6. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN, et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the subcommittee of professional and public education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation. 2005;111(5):697-716.
7. White WB, Berson AS, Robbins C, Jamieson MJ, Prisant LM, Roccella E, et al. National standard for measurement of resting and ambulatory blood pressures with automated sphygmomanometers. Hypertension. 1993;21(4):504-9.
8. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307-10.
9. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8(2):135-60.
10. Altunkan S, Ilman N, Kayaturk N, Altunkan E. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults. Blood Press Monit. 2007;12(4):219-25.
11. Grim CE, Grim CM. Omron HEM-711 DLX home Blood pressure monitor passes the European Society of Hypertension International Validation Protocol. Blood Press Monit. 2008;13(4):225-6.
12. Rotch AL, Dean JO, Kendrach MG, Wright SG, Woolley TW. Blood pressure monitoring with home monitors versus mercury sphygmomanometer. Ann Pharmacother. 2001;35(7-8):817-22.
13. Omboni S, Riva I, Giglio A, Caldara G, Groppelli A, Parati G. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. Blood Press Monit. 2007;12(4):233-42.
14. Coleman A, Steel S, Freeman P, de Greeff A, Shennan A. Validation of the Omron M7 (HEM-780-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol. Blood Press Monit. 2008;13(1):49-54.
15. Lewis JE, Boyle E, Magharious L, Myers MG. Evaluation of a community-based automated blood pressure measuring device. CMAJ. 2002;166(9):1145-8.
16. Iglesias Bonilla P, Mayoral Sánchez E, Lapetra Peralta J, Iborra Oquendo M, Villalba Alcalá F, Cayuela Dominguez A. Validation of two systems of self-measurement of blood pressure, the OMRON HEM-705 CP and OMRON M1 (HEM 422C2-E) models. Aten Primaria. 2002;30(1):22-8.
17. O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, Thomas M. Evaluation of three devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the revised British Hypertension Society Protocol: the Omron HEM-705CP, Philips HP5332, and Nissei DS-175. Blood Press Monit. 1996;1(1):55-61.
18. Furusawa EA, Ruiz MF, Saito MI, Koch VH. Evaluation of the Omron 705-CP blood pressure measuring device for use in adolescents and young adults. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2005;84(5):367-70.
19. Greenland S. Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis. Am J Public Health. 1989;79(3):340-9.