Dynamics of haplogroup frequencies and survival rates in a contact zone of two mtDNA lineages of the lizard Lacerta vivipara

Ecography

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 436-447

  Heulin, Benoit ^a   Surget Groba, Yann ^b   Sinervo, Barry ^c   Miles, Donald ^d   Guiller, Annie ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; DEMOGRAPHY; DNA; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GLACIATION; LIZARD; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; PLEISTOCENE; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SELECTION; SURVIVAL;

SQUAMATA; ZOOTOCA VIVIPARA;

EID: 79957870235     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06540.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alcobendas, M. et al. 1996. Geographic variation in allozymes of populations of Salamandra salamandra (Amphibia: Urodela) exhibiting distinct reproductive modes. J. Evol. Biol. 9: 83-102.
2. Avise, J. C. et al. 1987. Intraspecific phylogeography: the bridge between population genetics and systematics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 489-522.
3. Ballard, J. W. O. and Kreitman, M. 1995. Is mitochondrial DNA a strictly neutral marker?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 485-488.
4. Ballard, J. W. O. and Rand, D. M. 2005. The population biology of mitochondrial DNA and its phylogenetic implications. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36: 621-642.
5. Barton, N. H. and Hewitt, G. M. 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16: 113-148.
6. Choquet, R. et al. 2004. M-SURGE: new software specifically designed for multi-state capture-recapture models. Anim. Biodivers. Conserv. 21: 207-215.
7. Choquet, R. et al. 2005. U-CARE 2.2 user's manual. CEFE, Montpellier, France.
8. Choquet, R. et al. 2006. M-SURGE 1.8 user's manual. CEFE, Montpellier, France.
9. Clement, M. et al. 2000. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1657-1660.
10. Deffontaine, V. et al. 2009. A relict bank vole lineage highlights the biogeographic history of the Pyrenean region in Europe. Mol. Ecol. 18: 2489-2502.
11. Dowling, D. K. et al. 2008. Evolutionary implications of non-neutral mitochondrial genetic variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23: 546-554.
12. Estoup, A. et al. 1996. Rapid one-tube DNA extraction for reliable PCR detection of fish polymorphic markers and transgenes. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotech. 5: 295-298.
13. Garcia-Paris, M. et al. 2003. Dispersal of viviparity across contact zones in Iberian populations of fire salamanders (Salamandra) inferred from discordance of genetic and morphological traits. Evolution 57: 129-143.
14. Godinho, R. et al. 2008. The limits of mtDNA phylogeography: complex patterns of population history in a highly structured Iberian lizard are only revealed by the use of nuclear markers. Mol. Ecol. 17: 4670-4683.
15. Guillaume, C. P. et al. 2000. Refuge areas and suture zones in the Pyrenean and Cantabrian regions: geographic variation of the female MPI sex-linked alleles among oviparous populations of the lizard Lacerta vivipara. Ecography 23: 3-11.
16. Heulin, B. 1985. Démographie d'une population de Lacerta vivipara de basse altitude. Acta Oecol. Oecol. Genet. 6: 261-280.
17. Heulin, B. 1989. Lacerta vivipara. - In: Société herpétologique de France (ed.), Atlas de répartition des amphibiens et reptiles de France. Univ. de Franche-Comté Press, Paris, pp. 132-133.
18. Heulin, B. and Guillaume, C. 1989. Extension géographique des populations ovipares de Lacerta vivipara. Rev. Ecol. 44: 39-45.
19. Heulin, B. et al. 1993. Interprétation biogéographique de la bimodalité de reproduction du lézard Lacerta vivipara: un modèle pour l'étude de l'évolution de la viviparité. Biogeographica 69: 1-11.
20. Heulin, B. et al. 1994. Survie et incubation des oeufs dans deux populations ovipares de Lacerta vivipara. Amphibia-Reptilia 15: 199-219.
21. Heulin, B. et al. 1997. Demography of a bimodal reproductive species of lizard (Lacerta vivipara): survival and density characteristics of oviparous populations. Herpetologica 53: 432-444.
22. Heulin, B. et al. 1999. Comparisons of mtDNA sequences (16S rRNA Gene) between oviparous and viviparous strains of Lacerta vivipara. Mol. Ecol. 8: 1627-1631.
23. Hewitt, G. M. 1988. Hybrid zones. Natural laboratories for evolutionary studies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 3: 158-166.
24. Hewitt, G. M. 1996. Some genetic consequences of ice ages, and their role in divergence and speciation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 58: 247-276.
25. Hewitt, G. M. 2000. The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405: 907-913.
26. Lazare, J. J. 1992. Intérêt des Pyrénées occidentales pour les études de biologie évolutive. Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. 139: 67-73.
27. Lebreton, J. D. et al. 1992. Modeling survival rate and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecol. Monogr. 62: 67-118.
28. Lindell, J. and Murphy, R. W. 2008. Simple identification of mitochondrial lineages in contact zones based on lineage-selective primers. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 8: 66-73.
29. Massot, M. 1992. Movements patterns of the common lizard (Lacerta vivipara) in relation to sex and age. - In: Korsos, Z. and Kiss, I. (eds), Proc. Sixth Ord. Genet. Meet. SEH, Nat. Hist. Mus. Press, Budapest, pp. 315-319.
30. Meiklejohn, C. D. et al. 2007. Positive and negative selection on the mitochondrial genome. Trends Genet. 23: 259-263.
31. Mossakowsky, D. et al. 1990. Hybridization in natural populations of ground beetles. Can. J. Zool. 68: 1783-1789.
32. Nylander, J. A. A. et al. 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Syst. Biol. 53: 47-67.
33. Petersen, M. and Wengel, J. 2003. LNA: a versatile tool for therapeutics and genomics. Trends Biotechnol. 21: 74-81.
34. Rodríguez-Muñoz, R. et al. 2007. Genetic differentiation of an endangered capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) population at the southern edge of the species range. Conserv. Genet. 8: 659-670.
35. Salomon, M. and Hemin, Y. 1992. Song variation in the chichaffs (Phylloscopus collybita) of the western Pyrénées - the contact zone between the collybita and brehmii forms. Ethology 92: 265-282.
36. Sinervo, B. et al. 2010. Erosion of lizard diversity by climate change and altered thermal niches. Science 328: 894-899.
37. Smith, M. F. and Patton, J. L. 1991. Variation in mitochondrial cytochrome b sequence in natural populations of South American akodontine rodents (Muridae: Sigmodontinae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 8: 85-103.
38. Strijbosch, H. 1995. Population structure and displacements in Lacerta vivipara. - In: Llorentes, G. A. et al (eds), Scientia Herpetologica. Proc. Seventh Ord. Genet. Meet. SEH, pp. 232-236.
39. Surget-Groba, Y. et al. 2001. Intraspecific phylogeography of Lacerta vivipara and the evolution of viviparity. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 18: 449-459.
40. Surget-Groba, Y. et al. 2006. Multiple origins of viviparity, or reversal from viviparity to oviparity? The European common lizard (Lacerta vivipara, Lacertidae) and the evolution of parity. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 87: 1-11.
41. Taberlet, P. et al. 1998. Comparative phylogeography and postglacial colonization routes in Europe. Mol. Ecol. 7: 453-464.
42. Templeton, A. R. et al. 1992. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic association with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132: 619-633.
43. Van Nuland, G. J. and Strijbosch, H. 1981. Annual rythmics of Lacerta vivipara and Lacerta agilis in Netherlands. Amphibia-Reptilia 2: 83-95.