Independent surrogate variable analysis to deconvolve confounding factors in large-scale microarray profiling studies

Bioinformatics

Volumn 27, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1496-1505

  Teschendorff, Andrew E ^a   Zhuang, Joanna ^a,b   Widschwendter, Martin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MESSENGER RNA;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; DNA METHYLATION; DNA MICROARRAY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; HUMAN; MALE; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DNA METHYLATION; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HUMANS; MALE; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; RNA, MESSENGER;

EID: 79957851822     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr171     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bartholomew,D.J. (1981) Posterior analysis of the factor model. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psych., 34, 93-99.
2. Bibikova,M. et al. (2009) Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling using Infinium assay. Epigenomics, 1, 177-200.
3. Blenkiron,C. et al. (2007)MicroRNA expression profiling of human breast cancer identifies new markers of tumor subtype. Genome Biol., 8, R214.
4. Bolstad,B.M. et al. (2003) A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics, 19, 185-193.
5. Buja,A. and Eyuboglu,N. (1992) Remarks on parallel analysis. Multivar. Behav. Res., 27, 509-540.
6. Carpentier,A.S. et al. (2004) The operons, a criterion to compare the reliability of transcriptome analysis tools: ICA is more reliable than ANOVA, PLS and PCA. Comput. Biol. Chem., 28, 3-10.
7. Comon,P. (1994) Independent component analysis, a new concept? Signal Process., 36, 287-314.
8. Doane,A.S. et al. (2006) An estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer subset characterized by a hormonally regulated transcriptional program and response to androgen. Oncogene, 25, 3994-4008.
9. Frigyesi,A. et al. (2006) Independent component analysis reveals new and biologically significant structures in micro array data. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 290.
10. Huang,D.S. and Zheng,C.H. (2006) Independent component analysis-based penalized discriminant method for tumor classification using gene expression data. Bioinformatics, 22, 1855-1862.
11. Hyvaerinen,A. et al. (2001) Independent Component Analysis. Wiley, New York.
12. Hyvaerinen,A. (1999) Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 10, 626-634.
13. Johnson,W.E. et al. (2007) Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. Biostatistics, 8, 118-127.
14. Laird,P.W. (2010) Principles and challenges of genome-wide dna methylation analysis. Nat. Rev. Genet., 11, 191-203.
15. Leek,J.T. and Storey,J.D. (2007) Capturing heterogeneity in gene expression studies by surrogate variable analysis. PLoS Genet., 3, 1724-1735.
16. Leek,J.T. and Storey,J.D. (2008) A general framework for multiple testing dependence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 105(48), 18718-18723.
17. Lee,S.I. and Batzoglou,S. (2003) Application of independent component analysis to microarrays. Genome Biol., 4, R76.
18. Liebermeister,W. (2002) Linear modes of gene expression determined by independent component analysis. Bioinformatics, 18, 51-60.
19. Loi,S. et al. (2007) Definition of clinically distinct molecular subtypes in estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinomas through genomic grade. J. Clin. Oncol., 25, 1239-1246.
20. Maegawa,S. et al. (2010) Widespread and tissue specific age-related DNA methylation changes in mice. Genome Res., 20, 332-340.
21. Martoglio,A.M. et al. (2002) A decomposition model to track gene expression signatures: preview on observer-independent classification of ovarian cancer. Bioinformatics, 18, 1617-1624.
22. Moore,L.E. et al. (2008) Genomic DNA hypomethylation as a biomarker for bladder cancer susceptibility in the spanish bladder cancer study: a case-control study. Lancet Oncol., 9, 359-366.
23. Plerou,V. et al. (2002) Random matrix approach to cross correlations in financial data. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys., 65, 066126.
24. Rakyan,V.K. et al. (2010) Human aging-associated dna hypermethylation occurs preferentially at bivalent chromatin domains. Genome Res., 20, 434-439.
25. Saidi,S.A. et al. (2004) Independent component analysis of microarray data in the study of endometrial cancer. Oncogene, 23, 6677-6683.
26. Sanchez,B.N. et al. (2009) An estimating equations approach to fitting latent exposure models with longitudinal health outcomes. Ann. Appl. Stat., 3, 830-856.
27. Schmidt,M. et al. (2008) The humoral immune system has a key prognostic impact in node-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res., 68, 5405-5413.
28. Sotiriou,C. et al. (2006) Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis. J. Natl Cancer Inst., 98, 262-272.
29. Storey,J.D. and Tibshirani,R. (2003) Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 9440-9445.
30. Teschendorff,A.E. et al. (2007) Elucidating the altered transcriptional programs in breast cancer using independent component analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol., 3, e161.
31. Teschendorff,A.E. et al. (2009) An epigenetic signature in peripheral blood predicts active ovarian cancer. PLoS One, 4, e8274.
32. Teschendorff,A.E. et al. (2010) Age-dependent dna methylation of genes that are suppressed in stem cells is a hallmark of cancer. Genome Res., 20, 440-446.
33. van 't Veer,L.J. et al. (2002) Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature, 415, 530-536.
34. Zhang,X.W. et al. (2005) Molecular diagnosis of human cancer type by gene expression profiles and independent component analysis. Eur. J. Hum. Genet., 13, 1303-1311.
35. Zheng,C.H. et al. (2009) Tumor clustering using nonnegative matrix factorization with gene selection. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed., 13, 599-607.