Spino-pelvic parameters after surgery can be predicted: A preliminary formula and validation of standing alignment

Spine

Volumn 36, Issue 13, 2011, Pages 1037-1045

  Lafage, Virginie ^a   Schwab, Frank ^a   Vira, Shaleen ^a   Patel, Ashish ^a   Ungar, Benjamin ^a   Farcy, Jean Pierre ^a  

^a NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

adult spinal deformity; balance formula; sagittal plane; Spino pelvic alignment; standing alignment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KYPHOSIS; LORDOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; OSTEOTOMY; PEDICLE SUBTRACTION OSTEOTOMY; PELVIC TILT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SAGITTAL VERTICAL AXIS; SPINE MALFORMATION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; KYPHOSIS; LINEAR MODELS; LORDOSIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEW YORK CITY; OSTEOTOMY; PELVIS; POSTURAL BALANCE; POSTURE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINE;

EID: 79957841661     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181eb9469     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, et al. Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine 2005;30:682-8. (Pubitemid 40388653)
2. Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, et al. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine 2005;30:2024-9. (Pubitemid 41363744)
3. Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, et al. Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34: E599-606.
4. Schwab F, Farcy JP, Bridwell K, et al. A clinical impact classification of scoliosis in the adult. Spine 2006;31:2109-14.
5. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G. Sagittal plane alignment of the spine and gravity: a radiological and clinical evaluation. Acta Orthop Belg 2005;71:213-20. (Pubitemid 40705140)
6. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, et al. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 1998;7:99-103. (Pubitemid 28223594)
7. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, et al. Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine 2005;30:346-53. (Pubitemid 40209263)
8. Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, et al. Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:1828-33.
9. Lafage V, Schwab F, Skalli W, et al. Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity: analysis of spinopelvic and gravity line parameters. Spine 2008;33:1572-8.
10. Schwab F, Lafage V, Boyce R, et al. Gravity line analysis in adult volunteers: age-related correlation with spinal parameters, pelvic parameters, and foot position. Spine 2006;31: E959-67. (Pubitemid 44885699)
11. Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, Roussouly P, et al. Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005;18:40-7. (Pubitemid 40239300)
12. Jackson RP, Hales C. Congruent spinopelvic alignment on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers. Spine 2000;25:2808-15. (Pubitemid 32042583)
13. Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, et al. Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:260-7. (Pubitemid 40216621)
14. Dubousset J. Three-dimensional analysis of the scoliotic deformity. In: Weinstein SL, ed. Pediatric Spine: Principles and Practice. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1994.
15. Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, et al. Adult spinal deformitypostoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35(25):2224-31.
16. Lafage V, Schwab F, Vira S, et al. Does vertebral level of pedicle subtraction osteotomy correlate with degree of spino-pelvic parameter correction? J Neurosurg Spine 2011;14(2):184-91.
17. Marks MC, Stanford CF, Mahar AT, et al. Standing lateral radiographic positioning does not represent customary standing balance. Spine 2003;28:1176-82. (Pubitemid 36667054)
18. Horton WC, Brown CW, Bridwell KH, et al. Is there an optimal patient stance for obtaining a lateral 36" radiograph? A critical comparison of three techniques. Spine 2005;30:427-33 (Pubitemid 40262156)
19. Rillardon L, Levassor N, Guigui P, et al. [Validation of a tool to measure pelvic and spinal parameters of sagittal balance]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2003;89:218-27. (Pubitemid 36626613)
20. El Fegoun AB, Schwab F, Gamez L, et al. Center of gravity and radiographic posture analysis: a preliminary review of adult volunteers and adult patients affected by scoliosis. Spine 2005;30:1535-40. (Pubitemid 40979746)
21. Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, et al. Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 2006;15:415-22.
22. Lafage V, Schwab F, Rubio F and Farcy JP. Impact of sagittal plane spinal deformity on the spino-pelvic relationship and gravity line position in adults. Scoliosis Research Society 41st Annual Meeting; September 13-16, 2006; Monterey, California.
23. Ondra SL, Marzouk S, Koski T, et al. Mathematical calculation of pedicle subtraction osteotomy size to allow precision correction of fixed sagittal deformity. Spine 2006;31: E973-9. (Pubitemid 44885701)