Manual and manipulative therapy compared to night splint for symptomatic hallux abducto valgus: An exploratory randomised clinical trial

Foot

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 71-78

  du Plessis, Morne ^a   Zipfel, Bernhard ^a,b   Brantingham, James W ^c   Parkin Smith, Gregory F ^d,e   Birdsey, Paul ^a   Globe, Gary ^c   Cassa, Tammy K ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

^c Cleveland Chiropractic College Los Angeles   (United States)

^d MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^e Cleveland Chiropractic College   (United States)

Author keywords

Great toe; Hallux abducto valgus; Manipulation; Manipulative therapy; Manual therapy; Splint

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENIENCE SAMPLE; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GONIOMETRY; HALLUX VALGUS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANIPULATIVE MEDICINE; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PARALLEL DESIGN; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; POST HOC ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SAMPLE SIZE; SPLINTING; TEACHING HOSPITAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROMETRY, ARTICULAR; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HALLUX VALGUS; HUMANS; MALE; METATARSOPHALANGEAL JOINT; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCULOSKELETAL MANIPULATIONS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SPLINTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79957833956     PISSN: 09582592     EISSN: 15322963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2010.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bunions F.J. Clin Evid (Online) 2009, (March). [pii:1112, PubMed PMID:19445756].
2. Schneider W., Knahr K. Surgery for hallux valgus. The expectations of patients and surgeons. Int Orthop 2001, 6(25):382.
3. Hattrup S.J., Johnson K.A. Hallux valgus: a review. Adv Orthop Surg 1985, 8(1):404.
4. Torkki M., Malmivaara A., Seitsalo S., Hoikka V., Laippala P., Paavolainen P. Surgery vs orthosis vs watchful waiting for hallux valgus: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001, 285(May (19)):2474-2480.
5. Coetzee J.C. Scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus repair: the dark side. Foot Ankle Int 2003, 24(1):29-33.
6. Sammarco G.J., Idusuyi O.B. Complications after surgery of the Hallux. Clin Orthop 2001, (October):59-71.
7. Jahss M. Disorders of the foot and ankle: medical and surgical management 1993, WB Saunders & Company, Philadelphia, PA. 2nd ed.
8. Torkki M., Malmivaara A., Seitsalo S., Hoikka V., Laippala P., Paavolainen P. Hallux valgus: immediate operation versus 1 year of waiting with or without orthoses: a randomized controlled trial of 209 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2003, 74(April (2)):209-215.
9. Thomas J.L., Blitch E.L., Chaney D.M., et al. Diagnosis and treatment of forefoot disorders. Section 1. Saggital deformities. J Foot Ankle Surg 2009, 48(March-April (2)):230-238.
10. Lorimer D., French G., O'Donnell M., Burrow J.G., Wall Barbara Neale's common foot disorders diagnosis and management 2006, Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, New York, p. 154-528. 7th ed.
11. Hawke F., Burns J., Radford J.A., du Toit V. Custom-made foot orthoses for the treatment of foot pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008, 3:CD006801.
12. Tang S.F., Chen C.P., Pan J.L., Chen J.L., Leong C.P., Chu N.K. The effects of a new foot-toe orthosis in treating painful hallux valgus. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002, 83(December (12)):1792-1795.
13. Tehraninasr A., Saeedi H., Forogh B., Bahramizadeh M., Keyhani M.R. Effects of insole with toe-separator and night splint on patients with painful hallux valgus: a comparative study. Prosthet Orthot Int 2008, 32(March (1)):79-83.
14. Brantingham J., Guiry S., Kretzmann H., Globe G., Kite V. A pilot study of the efficacy of a conservative chiropractic protocol using graded mobilization, manipulation and ice in the treatment of symptomatic hallux abductovalgus bunions. Clin Chiropr 2005, 8(3):117-133.
15. Ferrari J., Higgins J.P., Prior T.D. Interventions for treating hallux valgus (abductovalgus) and bunions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004, 1:CD000964.
16. Campbell M., Fitzpatrick R., Haines A., Kinmonth A.L. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions. Br Med J 2000, 321:694-696.
17. Brantingham J.W., Globe G., Pollard H., Hicks M., Korporaal C., Hoskins W. Manipulative therapy of lower extremity conditions: expansion of a literature review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2009, 32(1):53-57.
18. de Luc K., Kitchiner D., Layton A., Morris E. Developing care pathways 2004, Oxford Radcliff Medical Press.
19. Campbell M., Hotchkiss R., Bradshaw N. Integrated care pathways. Br Med J 1998, 316(7125):133.
20. Stevenson K., Hay E. An integrated care pathway for the management of low back pain. Physiotherapy 2004, 90(91):96.
21. Aita M., Richer M.-C., Heon M. Illuminating the processes of knowledge transfer in nursing. Worldviews Evidence-Based Nurs 2007, 4:3.
22. Anderson G. Implementing practice guidelines. Can Med Assoc J 1993, 148:5.
23. Calliet R. Foot and ankle pain 1997, F.A. Davis Company, Philadelphia, p. 12-174. 3rd ed.
24. Reid C. Sports injury assessment and rehabilitation 1992, p. 131-49.
25. Levy L.A., Hetherington V.J. Principles and practice of podiatric medicine 1990, Churchill Livingstone, New York.
26. Magee D. Orthopedic physical assessment 1997, W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, p. 4-675. 3rd ed.
27. Donatelli R.A. The biomechanics of the foot and ankle 1990, F.A. Davis Company, Philadelphia, p. 92-4.
28. Peterson D.H., Bergmann T.F. Chiropractic technique: principles and procedures 2002, Mosby, St. Louis, MO, p. 39-501. 2nd ed.
29. Peterson D.H., Bergmann T.F. Chiropractic technique: principles and procedures 2002, Mosby, St. Louis, MO. 2nd ed.
30. Deyle G.D., Allison S.C., Matekel R.L., et al. Physical therapy treatment effectiveness for osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized comparison of supervised clinical exercise and manual therapy procedures versus a home exercise program. Phys Ther 2005, 85(December (12)):1301-1317.
31. Cleland J.A., Abbott J.H., Kidd M.O., et al. Manual physical therapy and exercise versus electrophysical agents and exercise in the management of plantar heel pain: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009, 39(August (8)):573-585.
32. Dimou E., Brantingham J., Wood T. A randomized, controlled trial (with blinded observer) of chiropractic manipulation and Achilles stretching vs orthotics for the treatment of plantar fascitis. J Am Chiropr Assoc 2004, 41(9):32-42.
33. Hetherington V.J. Hallux valgus and forefoot surgery 1994, Churchill Livingstone, New York, p. 42-9, 393. 7th ed.
34. Lorimer D., French G., O'Donnell M., Burrow J.G., Wall Barbara Neale's common foot disorders diagnosis and management 2006, Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier, New York. 7th ed.
35. Harvey E., Burton A.K., Moffett J.K., Breen A. Spinal manipulation for low-back pain: a treatment package agreed to by the UK chiropractic, osteopathy and physiotherapy professional associations. Man Ther 2003, 8(February (1)):46-51.
36. Budiman-Mak E., Conrad K.J., Roach K.E. The foot function index: a measure of foot pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol 1991, 44(6):561-570.
37. Kuyvenhoven M.M., Gorter K.J., Zuithoff P., Budiman-Mak E., Conrad K.J., Post M.W. The foot function index with verbal rating scales (FFI-5pt): a clinimetric evaluation and comparison with the original FFI. J Rheumatol 2002, 29(May (5)):1023-1028.
38. Saag K.G., Saltzman C.L., Brown C.K., Budiman-Mak E. The foot function index for measuring rheumatoid arthritis pain: evaluating side-to-side reliability. Foot Ankle Int 1996, 17(August (8)):506-510.
39. Tubach F., Ravaud P., Baron G., et al. Evaluation of clinically relevant changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the minimal clinically important improvement. Ann Rheum Dis 2005, 64(January (1)):29-33.
40. Ostelo R.W., Deyo R.A., Stratford P., et al. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine 2008, 33(January (1)):90-94.
41. Landorf K.B., Radford J.A. Minimal important difference: values for the foot health status questionnaire, foot function index and visual analogue scale. The Foot 2008, 18(March (1)):15-19.
42. Portney L., Watkins P. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice 2000, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, p. 83-142. 2nd ed.
43. Haneline M. Evidence-based chiropractic practice 2007, Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Inc., Sudbury, MA, p. 1-175.
44. Portney L., Watkins P. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice 2009, Pearson/Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, p 142-584. 3rd ed.
45. Lauridsen H.H., Hartvigsen J., Manniche C., Korsholm L., Grunnet-Nilsson N. Responsiveness and minimally clinically important differences for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord 2006, 25(7):82.
46. Ostelo R.W., de Vet H.C. Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2005, 19(August (4)):593-607.
47. Altman D., Schultz K., Moher D. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomised controlled trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2001, 8:134.