Recognizing the institutional dimension of strategic environmental assessment

Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 133-140

  Jiliberto, Rodrigo ^a  

^a TAU Consultora Ambiental   (Spain)

Author keywords

Governance; Public policies; Strategic environmental assessment

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT;

EID: 79957792656     PISSN: 14615517     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/146155111X12959673795921     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ahmed, K, J R Mercier and R Vermeem 2005. Strategic Environmental Assessment - Concept and Practice. Environment Strategy No. 14. Washington, DC: Environment Department, World Bank.
2. Bina, O 2007. A critical review of the dominant lines of argumentation on the need for strategic environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 585-606.
3. Bina, O. 2008. Strategic Environmental Assessment. In Innovation in Environmental Policy? Integrating Environment for Sustainability, ed.AJordan andALenschow, pp. 134-157.Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
4. Bina O, T Wallington and W Thissen 2011. Strategic environmental assessment theory and research: an analysis of discourse. In Handbook of Strategic Environmental Assessment, ed. B Sadler, R Aschermann, J Dusik, T B Fischer, M Partidário and R Verheem, Chapter 28. London: Earthscan.
5. Brown, A L and R Therivel 2000. Principles to guide strategic environmental assessment methodology. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18(3), 183-190.
6. Caratti, P, H Dalkmann and R Jiliberto 2004. Analysing Strategic Environmental Assessment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
7. Dalal-Clayton, B and B Sadler 2005. Strategic Environmental Assessment, A Source Book and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan.
8. Dalkmann, H and M Nilsson 2001. Decision-making and strategic environmental assessment. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 3(3), 305-327.
9. Dalkmann, H, D Bongart and R Jiliberto 2004. Analytical strategic environmental assessment (ANSEA) developing a new approach to SEA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24(4), 385-402.
10. EC 2001. La Gobernanza Europea. Un Libro Blanco. Brussels. Official Journal No. 287 of 12/10/2001, pp. 0001-0029.
11. EC 2009. European Commission. DG Environment. Study concerning the report on the application and effectiveness of the SEA Directive (2001/42/EC). Final Report. Brussels.
12. Fischer, T B 2005. Having an impact? - Context elements for effective SEA application in transport policy, plan and programme making. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 7(3), 407-432.
13. Habermas, J 2003. Teoría de la acción comunicativa, Racionalidad de la acción y racionalización social. Spain: Taurus.
14. Hilding-Rydevik, T and H Bjarnadóttir 2007. Context awareness and sensitivity in SEA implementation. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 666-684.
15. Jiliberto, R 2002. Decision related environment values as object of analysis of strategic environment assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 20(1), 61-70.
16. Jiliberto, R 2004. Setting the ground for a new SEA approach. In Analysing Strategic Environmental Assessment, ed. P Caratti, H Dalkmann and R Jiliberto, pp. 16-25. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
17. Jiliberto, R 2007. Strategic Environmental Assessment: The need to transform the environmental assessment paradigm. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 9(2), 211-234.
18. Jiliberto, R and M Bonilla 2009. Guía de Evaluación Ambiental Estratégica. Santiago, Chile: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), United Nations.
19. Kornov, L and W Thissen 2000. Rationality in decision- and policymaking: implications for strategic environmental assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18(3), 191-200.
20. Mercier, J and K Ahmed 2004. EIA and SEA at the World Bank. Paper presented to the Proceedings of the 8th forum of the Intergovernmental Policy Forum on Environmental Assessment, Vancouver, Canada.
21. Partidário, M 2007. Strategic Environmental Assessment Good Practices Guide. Lisbon: Portuguese Environment Agency.
22. Runhaar, H and P P J Driessen 2007. What makes strategic environmental assessment successful environmental assessment? The role of context in the contribution of SEA to decisionmaking. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 25(1), 2-14.
23. Sadler, B 2008. International trends and developments in SEA process and practice. In International Experience on Strategic Environmental Assessment, ed. Elvis W K Au, Kin Che Lam, Tan Zhu and Maria Partidário. Beijing, China: Centre of Strategic Environmental Assessment for China, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Institute of Environmental Impact Assessment, Research Centre for Strategic Environmental Assessment, Nankai University.
24. Sadler, B and R Verheem 1996. Strategic Environmental Assessment - Status, Challenges and Future Directions. Publication. No. 54. The Hague, The Netherlands: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment of the Netherlands.
25. Simon, H 1997. Administrative Behaviour. New York: Free Press.
26. Therivel, R and M Partidário 1996. The Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment. London: Earthscan.
27. Therivel R E, Wilson, S, Thompson, DHeaney andDPritchard 1992. Strategic Environmental Assessment. London: Earthscan.
28. UNDP 2000. Strategy Note on Governance for Human Development. United Nations Development Programme.
29. UNDP 2004. UNDP Environmental Mainstreaming Strategy. United Nations Development Programme, Bureau for Development Policy.
30. Verheem, R and J Tonk 2000. Strategic environmental assessment: one concept multiple forms. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18(3), 177-182.
31. Wallington, T, O Bina and W Thissen 2007. Theorising strategic environmental assessment: Fresh perspectives and future challenges. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 569-584.
32. World Bank 2005. Integrating Environmental Considerations in Policy Formulation. Lessons from Policy-Based SEA Experience. Washington, DC: Environment Department, World Bank.