메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 61-70

Decisional environment values as the object of analysis for strategic environmental assessment

Author keywords

Decisional environment values; Strategic environmental assessment

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

EID: 0036270491     PISSN: 14615517     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154602781766816     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (6)

References (39)
  • 2
    • 0033742811 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Principles to guide strategic environmental assessment methodology
    • September
    • Brown, A. L., and Thérivel, R., 2000. “Principles to guide strategic environmental assessment methodology”. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18 (3):183–190. September
    • (2000) Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , vol.18 , Issue.3 , pp. 183-190
    • Brown, A.L.1    Thérivel, R.2
  • 9
    • 0000729330 scopus 로고
    • Mixed scanning, a third approach to decision making
    • Etzioni, A., 1967. “Mixed scanning, a third approach to decision making”. Public Administration Review,:17
    • (1967) Public Administration Review , pp. 17
    • Etzioni, A.1
  • 10
    • 0009425443 scopus 로고
    • The politics of environmental impacts assessment
    • Formby, J., 1989. “The politics of environmental impacts assessment”. Impact Assessment Bulletin, 8 (1+2):247–273.
    • (1989) Impact Assessment Bulletin , vol.8 , Issue.1-2 , pp. 247-273
    • Formby, J.1
  • 13
    • 85024598395 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • last accessed January 2002
    • IAIA, International Association for Impact Assessment. 2002. http://www.iaia.com,last accessed January 2002
    • (2002)
  • 16
    • 0033733480 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rationality in decision- and policy-making: Implications for strategic environmental assessment
    • September
    • Kernev, L., and Thissen, W., 2000. “Rationality in decision- and policy-making:implications for strategic environmental assessment”. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18 (3):191–200. September
    • (2000) Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , vol.18 , Issue.3 , pp. 191-200
    • Kernev, L.1    Thissen, W.2
  • 17
    • 0002427157 scopus 로고
    • The science of muddling through
    • Lindblom, C. E., 1959. “The science of muddling through”. Public Administration Review, 19:79–99.
    • (1959) Public Administration Review , vol.19 , pp. 79-99
    • Lindblom, C.E.1
  • 27
    • 0009357852 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Tiene futuro la teoría de la decision
    • de Gestion B., (ed), Madrid
    • Rapoport, A., 1998. “Tiene futuro la teoría de la decision”. In Decision, Responsabilidad y Control Edited by:de Gestion, Biblioteca. Madrid
    • (1998) Decision, Responsabilidad y Control
    • Rapoport, A.1
  • 30
    • 0002298346 scopus 로고
    • From substantive to procedural rationality
    • Latsis S.J., (ed), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    • Simon, H., 1976. “From substantive to procedural rationality”. In Method and Appraisal in Economics, Edited by:Latsis, S. J., Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
    • (1976) Method and Appraisal in Economics
    • Simon, H.1
  • 36
    • 0033733499 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Strategic environmental assessment: One concept multiple forms
    • September
    • Verheem, R. A., and Tonk, J. AMN. 2000. “Strategic environmental assessment:one concept multiple forms”. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18 (3):177–182. September
    • (2000) Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , vol.18 , Issue.3 , pp. 177-182
    • Verheem, R.A.1    Tonk, J.A.M.N.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.