Systematic review and meta-analysis of intraoperative versus preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and suspected common bile duct stones

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 98, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 908-916

  Gurusamy, K ^a,b   Sahay, S J ^a   Burroughs, A K ^b   Davidson, B R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL FREE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GALLSTONE; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; GALLSTONES; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; LENGTH OF STAY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SPHINCTEROTOMY, ENDOSCOPIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79957736826     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7460     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Rome Group for the Epidemiology and Prevention of Cholelithiasis (GREPCO). Prevalence of gallstone disease in an Italian adult female population. Am J Epidemiol 1984; 119: 796-805.
2. The Rome Group for Epidemiology and Prevention of Cholelithiasis (GREPCO). The epidemiology of gallstone disease in Rome, Italy. Part I. Prevalence data in men. Hepatology 1988; 8: 904-906.
3. Bates T, Harrison M, Lowe D, Lawson C, Padley N,. Longitudinal study of gall stone prevalence at necropsy. Gut 1992; 33: 103-107.
4. Halldestam I, Enell EL, Kullman E, Borch K,. Development of symptoms and complications in individuals with asymptomatic gallstones. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 734-738. (Pubitemid 38746142)
5. Attili AF, De Santis A, Capri R, Repice AM, Maselli S,. The natural history of gallstones: the GREPCO experience. The GREPCO Group. Hepatology 1995; 21: 655-660.
6. Strasberg SM, Clavien PA,. Overview of therapeutic modalities for the treatment of gallstone diseases. Am J Surg 1993; 165: 420-426. (Pubitemid 23276821)
7. Ballal M, David G, Willmott S, Corless DJ, Deakin M, Slavin JP,. Conversion after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 2338-2344.
8. Hainsworth PJ, Rhodes M, Gompertz RH, Armstrong CP, Lennard TW,. Imaging of the common bile duct in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gut 1994; 35: 991-995. (Pubitemid 24202733)
9. Ausch C, Hochwarter G, Taher M, Holzer B, Rosen HR, Urban M, et al., Improving the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the routine use of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiography. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 574-580. (Pubitemid 40897974)
10. Yang MH, Chen TH, Wang SE, Tsai YF, Su CH, Wu CW, et al., Biochemical predictors for absence of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1620-1624.
11. Hong DF, Xin Y, Chen DW,. Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct for cholecystocholedocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 424-427. (Pubitemid 43260500)
12. Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J,. Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (2)CD003327.
13. Larraz-Mora E, Mayol J, Martinez-Sarmiento J, Alvarez-Bartolom M, Larroque-Derlon M, Fernández-Represa JA,. Open biliary tract surgery: multivariate analysis of factors affecting mortality. Dig Surg 1999; 16: 204-208. (Pubitemid 29361285)
14. Ludwig K, Köckerling F, Hohenberger W, Lorenz D,. [Surgical therapy in cholecysto-/choledocholithiasis. Results of a Germany-wide questionnaire sent to 859 clinics with 123 090 cases of cholecystectomy.] Chirurg 2001; 72: 1171-1178. (Pubitemid 33688437)
15. Spelsberg FW, Nusser F, Huttl TK, Obeidat FW, Lang RA, Jauch KW, et al., [Management of cholecysto- and choledocholithiasisâsurvey and analysis of 16 615 cholecystectomies and common bile duct explorations in Bavaria.] Zentralbl Chir 2009; 134: 120-126.
16. Bingener J, Schwesinger WH,. Management of common bile duct stones in a rural area of the United States: results of a survey. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 577-579.
17. HES Online. Main Procedures and Interventions: 4 Character. [accessed 1 November 2009].
18. Cavina E, Franceschi M, Sidoti F, Goletti O, Buccianti P, Chiarugi M,. Laparo-endoscopic 'rendezvous': a new technique in the choledocholithiasis treatment. Hepatogastroenterology 1998; 45: 1430-1435. (Pubitemid 28515132)
19. Gluud C, Nikolova D, Klingenberg S, Alexakis N, Als-Nielsen B, D'Amico G, et al., Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group. About The Cochrane Collaboration (Cochrane Review Groups (CRGs)). In The Cochrane Library, 2008; Issue 4.
20. Higgins JPT, Green S, (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 5.0.0 [updated February 2008]. [accessed 1 July 2008].
21. Wong SS, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB,. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies in EMBASE. J Med Libr Assoc 2006; 94: 41-47.
22. Kjaergard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C,. Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135: 982-989. (Pubitemid 33131619)
23. Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, et al., Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 1998; 352: 609-613. (Pubitemid 28380142)
24. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG,. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995; 273: 408-412.
25. Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, Schulz KF, Juni P, Altman DG, et al., Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ 2008; 336: 601-605. (Pubitemid 351439518)
26. Gurusamy KS, Gluud C, Nikolova D, Davidson BR,. Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 342-349.
27. Devereaux PJ, Bhandari M, Clarke M, Montori VM, Cook DJ, Yusuf S, et al., Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2005; 330: 88.
28. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.0. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration: Copenhagen, 2008.
29. DerSimonian R, Laird N,. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177-188. (Pubitemid 17189972)
30. Demets DL,. Methods for combining randomized clinical trials: strengths and limitations. Stat Med 1987; 6: 341-350.
31. Higgins JP, Thompson SG,. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002; 21: 1539-1558. (Pubitemid 34746062)
32. Newell DJ,. Intention-to-treat analysis: implications for quantitative and qualitative research. Int J Epidemiol 1992; 21: 837-841.
33. Egger M, Davey G, Schneider M, Minder C,. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315: 629-634. (Pubitemid 27387172)
34. Macaskill P, Walter SD, Irwig L,. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Stat Med 2001; 20: 641-654. (Pubitemid 32166424)
35. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG,; PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000097.
36. Tzovaras G, Baloyiannis I,. Laparoendoscopic Rendez Vous Versus Standard Two Stage Approach for the Management of Cholelithiasis/Choledocholithiasis. NCT004162342010. [accessed 1 March 2011].
37. Lella F, Bagnolo F, Rebuffat C, Scalambra M, Bonassi U, Colombo E,. Use of the laparoscopic-endoscopic approach, the so-called 'rendezvous' technique, in cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a valid method in cases with patient-related risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 419-423. (Pubitemid 43260499)
38. Morino M, Baracchi F, Miglietta C, Furlan N, Ragona R, Garbarini A,. Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus laparoendoscopic rendezvous in patients with gallbladder and bile duct stones. Ann Surg 2006; 244: 889-893. (Pubitemid 44808620)
39. Rábago LR, Vicente C, Soler F, Delgado M, Moral I, Guerra I, et al., Two-stage treatment with preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) compared with single-stage treatment with intraoperative ERCP for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis with possible choledocholithiasis. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 779-786. (Pubitemid 44314631)
40. Elgeidie AA, Elebidy GK, Naeem YM,. Preoperative versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for management of common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 1230-1237.
41. Cotton PB,. Cannulation of the papilla of Vater by endoscopy and retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Gut 1972; 13: 1014-1025.
42. Terruzzi V, Radaelli F, Meucci G, Minoli G,. Is the supine position as safe and effective as the prone position for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? A prospective randomized study. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 1211-1214. (Pubitemid 41763538)
43. Tringali A, Mutignani M, Milano A, Perri V, Costamagna G,. No difference between supine and prone position for ERCP in conscious sedated patients: a prospective randomized study. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 93-97. (Pubitemid 351292208)
44. Pierce RA, Jonnalagadda S, Spitler JA, Tessier DJ, Liaw JM, Lall SC, et al., Incidence of residual choledocholithiasis detected by intraoperative cholangiography at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients having undergone preoperative ERCP. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 2365-2372.
45. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, Fennerty MB, Lee JG, Bjorkman DJ, et al., Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 425-434. (Pubitemid 33661145)
46. Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL, Barnett J, Freeman M, Geenen J, et al., Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 139-147. (Pubitemid 43381722)
47. Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher J, Romagnuolo J,. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11 497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 80-88.
48. Sanjay P, Kulli C, Polignano FM, Tait IS,. Optimal surgical technique, use of intra-operative cholangiography (IOC), and management of acute gallbladder disease: the results of a nation-wide survey in the UK and Ireland. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010; 92: 302-306.
49. Briggs AH, Ades AE, Price MJ,. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for decision trees with multiple branches: use of the Dirichlet distribution in a Bayesian framework. Med Decis Making 2003; 23: 341-350. (Pubitemid 36899100)
50. Claxton K, Sculpher M, McCabe C, Briggs A, Akehurst R, Buxton M, et al., Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for NICE technology assessment: not an optional extra. Health Econ 2005; 14: 339-347. (Pubitemid 40514748)
51. Chang L, Lo S, Stabile BE, Lewis RJ, Toosie K, de Virgilio C,. Preoperative versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in mild to moderate gallstone pancreatitis: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 2000; 231: 82-87. (Pubitemid 30043943)
52. Stevens PD, Green PHR, Stein JA, Lightdale CJ, Chabot JA, LoGerfo P, et al., Preoperative vs postoperative ERCP for suspected choledocholithiasis in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 41: 417 (Abstract).
53. Johlin FC, Pelsang RE, Greenleaf M,. Phantom study to determine radiation exposure to medical personnel involved in ERCP fluoroscopy and its reduction through equipment and behavior modifications. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 893-897. (Pubitemid 34408244)