No difference between supine and prone position for ERCP in conscious sedated patients: A prospective randomized study

Endoscopy

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 93-97

  Tringali, A ^a   Mutignani, M ^a   Milano, A ^b   Perri, V ^a   Costamagna, G ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b Unit of Gastroenterology   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MIDAZOLAM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT CANCER; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; BODY POSTURE; BRADYCARDIA; CANNULATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; CONTINUING EDUCATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DUODENOSCOPY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL EXPERT; PATIENT POSITIONING; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SUPINE POSITION; TACHYCARDIA; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; BILIARY TRACT DISEASES; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROBABILITY; PRONE POSITION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPINE POSITION;

EID: 39749165209     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-995317     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Taylor AJ, Bohorfoush AG III (eds). Interpretation of ERCP. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997
2. Yakshe PN, Vennes JA. Technique of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. In: Sivak MV Jr (ed). Gastroenterologic endoscopy. 2nd edn., chap 57. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2000: 845-862
3. Leung J. Fundamentals of ERCP. In: Leung J, Cotton PB (eds). ERCP Advanced Endoscopy E-book/Annual. 2004 http://www.gastrohep.com/ advancedendo/book3.asp
4. Terruzzi V, Radaelli F, Meucci G, Minoli G. Is the supine position as safe and effective as the prone position for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? A prospective randomized study. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 1211-1214
5. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL. ASA physical status classification: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 1978; 43: 239-243
6. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 909-919
7. Schutz SM, Abbott RM. Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 535-539
8. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991: 37: 383-393
9. Froehlich F. Patient position during ERCP: prone versus supine. What about the left lateral throughout? Endoscopy 2006; 38: 755