"Marriage is More Than Being Together": The Meaning of Marriage for Young Adults

Journal of Family Issues

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 845-875

  Kefalas, Maria J ^a   Furstenberg, Frank F ^b   Carr, Patrick J ^c   Napolitano, Laura ^b  

^a SAINT JOSEPH S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Marriage; Relationships; Transition to adulthood; Youth

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957704466     PISSN: 0192513X     EISSN: 15525481     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0192513X10397277     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Amato, P.R. (2004). Tension between institutional and individual views of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 959-965.
2. Arnett, J.J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.
3. Axinn, W., & Thornton, A. (2000). The transformation in the meaning of marriage. In L. Waite (Ed.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 147-165). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
4. Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The normal chaos of love. London, England: Polity Press.
5. Bianchi, S., & Casper, L. (2002). American families. Population Bulletin, 455(4), 1-44.
6. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7. Borgen, L., & Rumbaut, R. (2010). Coming of age in "America's finest city": Transitions to adulthood among children of immigrants in San Diego. In M. Waters, P. J. Carr, M. Kefalas, & J. Holdaway (Eds.), Coming of age in America.
8. Brown, S.L. (2000). Union transitions among cohabitors: The significance of relationship assessments and expectations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 833-846.
9. Bumpass, L., & Lu, H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children's family contexts in the United States. Population Studies, 54, 29-41.
10. Carr, P.J., & Kefalas, M. (2009). Hollowing out the middle: The rural brain drain and what it means for America. Boston, MA: Beacon.
11. Cherlin, A. (2004). The deinstutionalization of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848-861.
12. Cloud, J. (2007, February 8). Social studies: Americans love marriage. But why? Time, 169, 8.
13. Coontz, S. (2005). Marriage, a history: From obedience to intimacy, or how love conquered marriage. New York, NY: Viking.
14. Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15. Edin, K., Kefalas, M., & Reed, J. (2004). A peek inside the black box: What marriage means to poor, unmarried parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1007-1014.
16. England, P., & Edin K. (2007). Unmarried couples with children. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
17. Giddens, A. (1993). The transformation of intimacy: Love, sexuality and eroticism in modern societies. London, England: Polity Press.
18. Goldstein, J.R., & Kenney, C.T. (2001). Marriage delayed or forgone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for U.S. women. American Sociological Review, 66, 505-519.
19. Graefe, D.R., & Lichter, D. (2002). Marriage among unwed mothers: Whites, blacks, and hispanics compared. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health,34, 286-293.
20. Hetherington, E.M., & Kelly, J. (2002). For better or for worse: Divorce reconsidered. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
21. Holdaway, J. (IN PRESS). If you can make it there. The transition to adulthood in New York City. In M. Waters, P. J. Carr, & M.Kefalas (Eds.), Coming of age in America.
22. LaRossa, R. (2005). Grounded theory methods and qualitative family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 837-857.
23. McLaughlin, D.K., Lichter, D., & Johnston, G.M. (1993). Some women marry young: Transitions to first marriage in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan Areas. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 827-838.
24. Mitchell, B.A. (2006a). The boomerang age: Transitions to adulthood in families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
25. Mitchell, B.A. (2006b). Changing courses: The pendulum of family transitions in comparative perspective. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 37, 325-343.
26. Moua, T. (2003). The Hmong culture: Kinship, marriage and family systems (Unpublished MA thesis). University of Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie, WI.
27. Osgood, D.W., Ruth, G., Eccles, J.S., Jacobs, J.E., & Barber, B. (2004). Six paths to adulthood: Fast starters, parents without careers, educated partners, educated singles, working singles, and slow starters. In R. A. Settersten Jr., F. Furstenberg Jr., & R. G. Rumbaut (Eds.), On the frontier of Adulthood: Theory, research, and public policy (pp. 320-355). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28. Popenoe, D. (1996). Promises to keep. New York, NY: Rowan & Littlefield.
29. Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30. Raley, R.K. (2000). Recent trends in marriage and cohabitation: The United States. In L. Waite (Ed.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 19-39). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
31. Rumbaut, R.G., & Komaie, G. (2007, September). Young adults in the United States: A mid-decade profile (Working paper). Network on Transitions to Adulthood Research Network. Retrieved from http://www.transad.pop.upenn.edu/downloads/Rumbaut%20Komaie%20-%20Young% 20Adults%20in%20US.pdf.
32. Seltzer, J. (2004). Cohabitation in the United States and Britain: Demography, kinship, and the future. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 921-928.
33. Settersten, R., Furstenberg, F., & Rumbaut, R. (2004). On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34. Shanahan, M. (2000). Pathways to adulthood in changing societies: Variability and mechanisms in life course perspective. Annual Review of Sociology,26, 667-692.
35. Smock, P. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1-20.
36. Smock, P.J., Manning W., & Porter M. (2005). "Everything's there except money": How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family,67, 680-696.
37. Snyder, A., Brown, S., & Condo, E. (2004). Residential differences in family formation: The significance of cohabitation. Rural Sociology,69, 235-260.
38. Stacey, J. (1997). In the name of the family: Rethinking family values in the postmodern age. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
39. Stanger-Ross, J., Collins C., & Stern, M. (2005). Falling far from the tree: Transitions to adulthood and the social history of Twentieth-Century America. Social Science History, 29, 625-648.
40. Swartz, T., Hartmann, D., & Mortimer, J. (IN PRESS). Transitions to adulthood in the land of Lake Woebegon. In M. Waters, P. J. Carr, M. Kefalas, & J. Holdaway (Eds.), Coming of age in America.
41. Sweeney, M.M. (2002). Two decades of family change: The shifting economic foundations of marriage. American Sociological Review, 67, 132-147.
42. Ventura, S.J., & Bachrach, C.A. (2000). Nonmarital childbearing in the United States, 1940-1999. National Vital Statistics Reports, 48, no. 16. Washington, DC: National Center for Health Statistics.
43. Waite, L., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York, NY: Doubleday.
44. Waters, M., Carr, P.J., & Kefalas, M. (IN PRESS). Introduction. In M. Waters, P. J. Carr, M. Kefalas, & J. Holdaway (Eds.), Coming of age in America.
45. Wilson, J.Q. (2002). The marriage problem: How our culture has weakened families. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
46. Wilson, W.J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47. Zernike, K. (2007, January 21). Why are there so many single Americans? New York Times, p. A1.
48. Zhou, M. (1997). Segmented assimilation: Issues, controversies and recent research on the new second generation. International Migration Review, 31, 975-1008.