Multiple-constraint choice models with corner and interior solutions

Marketing Science

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 481-490

  Satomura, Takuya ^a   Kim, Jaehwan ^b   Allenby, Greg M ^c  

^a KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Korea University   (South Korea)

^c OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Choice model; Corner and interior solutions; Multiple constraints; Quantity restriction

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957639716     PISSN: 07322399     EISSN: 1526548X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1110.0636     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Becker, G. S. 1965. A theory of the allocation of time. Econom. J. 75(299) 493-517.
2. Bell, D. R., C. A. L. Hilber. 2006. An empirical test of the theory of sales: Do household storage constraints affect consumer and store behavior? Quant. Marketing Econom. 4(2) 87-117.
3. Bhat, C. R. 2005. A multiple discrete-continuous extreme value model: Formulation and application to discretionary time-use decisions. Transportation Res. 39(8) 679-707.
4. Bhat, C. R. 2008. The multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model: Role of utility function parameters, identification considerations, and model extensions. Transportation Res. 42(3) 274-303.
5. Bockstael, N. E., I. E. Strand, W. M. Hanemann. 1987. Time and the recreational demand model. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 69(2) 293-302.
6. Bronnenberg, B. J., W. R. Vanhonacker. 1996. Limited choice sets, local price response, and implied measures of price competition. J. Marketing Res. 33(2) 163-173.
7. Deaton, A., J. Muellbauer. 1980. Economics and Consumer Behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
8. Dubé, J.-P. 2004. Multiple discreteness and product differentiation: Demand for carbonated soft drinks. Marketing Sci. 23(1) 66-81.
9. Gilbride, T. J., G. M. Allenby. 2004. A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules. Marketing Sci. 23(3) 391-406.
10. Hanemann, W. M. 2006. Consumer demand with several linear constraints: A global analysis. T. Aronsson, R. Axelsson, R. Brännlund, eds. The Theory and Practice of Environmental and Resource Economics: Essays in Honour of Karl-Gustaf Löfgren. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 61-84.
11. Hausman, J. A. 1985. The econometrics of nonlinear budget sets. Econometrica 53(6) 1255-1282.
12. Hendel, I., A. Nevo. 2006. Sales and consumer inventory. RAND J. Econom. 37(3) 543-561.
13. Hermalin, B. E., A. M. Isen. 2008. A model of the effect of affect on economic decision making. Quant. Marketing Econom. 6(1) 17-40.
14. Kim, J., G. M. Allenby, P. E. Rossi. 2002. Modeling consumer demand for variety. Marketing Sci. 21(3) 229-250.
15. Kim, J., G. M. Allenby, P. E. Rossi. 2007. Product attributes and models of multiple discreteness. J. Econometrics 138(1) 208-230.
16. Kockelman, K. M., S. Krishnamurthy. 2004. A new approach for travel demand modeling: Linking Roy's Identity to discrete choice. Transportation Res. 38(5) 459-475.
17. Moffitt, R. 1986. The econometric of piecewise-linear budget constraints: A survey and exposition of the maximum likelihood method. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 4(3) 317-328.
18. Ofek, E., V. Srinivasan. 2002. How much does the market value an improvement in a product attribute? Marketing Sci. 21(4) 398-411.
19. Parizat, S., R. Shachar. 2010. When Pavarotti meets Harry Potter at the Super Bowl. Working paper, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1711183.
20. von Haefen, R. H., D. J. Phaneuf. 2003. Estimating preferences for outdoor recreation: A comparison of continuous and count data demand system frameworks. J. Environ. Econom. Management 45(3) 612-630.