Twelve tips for implementing a successful peer assessment

Medical Teacher

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 443-446

  Finn, Gabrielle M ^a   Garner, Jayne ^b  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; PEER GROUP; PEER REVIEW; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; PEER GROUP; PEER REVIEW, HEALTH CARE; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 79957600182     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.546909     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Arnold L, Shue CK, Kritt B, Ginsburg S, Stern DT. 2005. Medical students' views on peer assessment of professionalism. J Gen Intern Med 20(9):819-824. (Pubitemid 41725696)
2. Arnold L, Shue CK, Kalishman S, Prislin M, Pohl C, Pohl H, Stern DT. 2007. Can there be a single system for peer assessment of professionalism among medical students? A multi-institutional study. Acad Med 82(6):578-586. (Pubitemid 46828207)
3. Dannefer EF, Henson LC, Bierer SB, Grady-Weliky TA, Meldrum S, Nofziger AC, Barclay C, Epstein RM. 2005. Peer assessment of professional competence. Med Educ 39(7):713-722. (Pubitemid 40897314)
4. Finn G, Garner J, Sawdon MA. 2010. You're judged all the time! Students' views on professionalism: A mutlicentre study. Med Educ 44:814-825.
5. Finn G, Sawdon M. 2009. Does peer and self-assessment correlate to the use of the conscientiousness index when evaluating professionalism in medical students? Association for the Study of Medical Education. Annual Scientific Meeting 2009. Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 15-17 July.
6. Finn G, Sawdon M. 2010. The impact of feedback and personality traits on students' ability to self and peer assess. Ottawa Conference. Miami, AMEE.
7. Finn G, Sawdon M, Clipsham L, McLachlan J. 2009. Peer estimates of low professionalism correlate with low conscientiousness index scores. Med Educ 43(10):960-967.
8. Garner J, McKendree J, O'Sullivan H, Taylor D. 2010. Undergraduate medical student attitudes to the peer assessment of professional behaviours in two medical schools. Educ Prim Care 21(1):32-37.
9. General Medical Council 2009. Tomorrow's doctors, UK: GMC.
10. Kane JS, Lawler EE. 1978. Methods of peer assessment. Psychol Bull 85(3):555-586.
11. McCormack WT. 2008. Can peer assessment serve as a tool to provide consistent measures of humanistic qualities? Presented at Arnold P. Gold Foundation Barriers conference 'Enhancing the Culture of Medical Education: Assessing Humanistic Growth and Mission,' 2003 January 17-19, New York, NY. Powerpoint presentation.
12. McCormack WT, Lazarus C, Stern D, Small Jr PA. 2007. Peer nomination: A tool for identifying medical student exemplars in clinical competence and caring, evaluated at three medical schools. Acad Med 82(11): 1033-1039. (Pubitemid 350035787)
13. Norcini JJ. 2003. Peer assessment of competence. Med Educ 37(6): 539-543. (Pubitemid 36718243)
14. Ramsey PG, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Inui TS, Larson EB, LoGerfo JP. 1993. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. JAMA 269(13): 1655-1660. (Pubitemid 23093951)
15. Stern DT, editor. 2006. Measuring medical professionalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Van Rosendaal GM, Jennett PA. 1992. Resistance to peer evaluation in an internal medicine residency. Acad Med 67(1):63.