The semantic mapping of words and co-words in contexts

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 469-475

  Leydesdorff, Loet ^a   Welbers, Kasper ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Document; Latent; Map; Meaning; Semantic; Text; Word

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957599595     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.008     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ahlgren P., Jarneving B., Rousseau R. Requirement for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2003, 54(6):550-560.
2. Bailón-Moreno R., Jurado-Almeda E., Ruiz-Baños R., Courtial J.P. The unified scientometric model: Fractality and transfractality. Scientometrics 2005, 65(2):231-257.
3. Bailón-Moreno R., Jurado-Almeda E., Ruiz-Baños R., Courtial J.P., Jiménez-Contreras E. The pulsing structure of science: Ortega y Gasset, Saint Matthew and transfractality. Scientometrics 2007, 71(1):3-24.
4. Bender-deMoll S., McFarland D.A. The art and science of dynamic network visualization. Journal of Social Structure 2006, 7(2). http://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume7/deMollMcFarland/.
5. Bensman S.J. Pearson's r and author cocitation analysis: A commentary on the controversy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2004, 55(10):935-936.
6. Callon M., Courtial J.-P., Turner W.A., Bauin S. From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information 1983, 22(2):191-235.
7. Mapping the dynamics of science and technology 1986, Macmillan, London. M. Callon, J. Law, A. Rip (Eds.).
8. Carley K.M., Kaufer D.S. Semantic connectivity: An approach for analyzing symbols in semantic networks. Communication Theory 1993, 3(3):183-213.
9. Danowski J.A. Inferences from word networks in messages. The content analysis reader 2009, 421-429. Sage, Los Angeles. K. Krippendorff, M.A. Bock (Eds.).
10. Egghe L., Leydesdorff L. The relation between Pearson's correlation coefficient r and Salton's cosine measure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(5):1027-1036.
11. Fruchterman T., Reingold E. Graph drawing by force-directed replacement. Software-Practice and Experience 1991, 21:1129-1166.
12. Hellsten I., Dawson J., Leydesdorff L. Implicit media frames: Automated analysis of public debate on artificial sweeteners. Public Understanding of Science 2010, 19(5):590-608.
13. Husserl E. Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge [Cartesian meditations and the Paris lectures] 1929, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, p. 1973.
14. Ijiri Y., Simon H.A. Skew Distributions and the Sizes of Business Firms 1977, North Holland, Amsterdam.
15. Kamada T., Kawai S. An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters 1989, 31(1):7-15.
16. Landauer T.K., Foltz P.W., Laham D. An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse processes 1998, 25(2):259-284.
17. Law J., Whittaker J. Mapping acidification research: A test of the co-word method. Scientometrics 1992, 23(3):417-461.
18. Leydesdorff L. Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organization. Research Policy 1989, 18(4):209-223.
19. Leydesdorff L. In search of epistemic networks. Social Studies of Science 1991, 21:75-110.
20. Leydesdorff L. A validation study of "LEXIMAPPE. Scientometrics 1992, 25:295-312.
21. Leydesdorff L. The challenge of scientometrics: The development, measurement, and self-organization of scientific communications 1995, DSWO Press/Leiden University, Leiden, (At http://www.universal-publishers.com/book.php?method=ISBN&book=1581126816).
22. Leydesdorff L. Why words and co-words cannot map the development of the sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1997, 48(5):418-427.
23. Leydesdorff L. The communication of meaning and the structuration of expectations: Giddens' "structuration theory" and Luhmann's "self-organization" Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2010, 61(10):2138-2150.
24. Leydesdorff L., Hellsten I. Metaphors and diaphors in science communication: Mapping the case of 'stem-cell research'. Science Communication 2005, 27(1):64-99.
25. Leydesdorff L., Probst C. The delineation of an interdisciplinary specialty in terms of a journal set: The case of communication studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(8):1709-1718.
26. Leydesdorff L., Vaughan L. Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science: Extending ACA to the web environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2006, 57(12):1616-1628.
27. Leydesdorff L., Schank T. Dynamic Animations of Journal Maps: Indicators of Structural Change and Interdisciplinary Developments. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008, 59(11):1810-1818.
28. Mead G.H. The point of view of social behaviourism. Works of G. H. Mead 1934, Vol. 1:1-41. University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London. C.H. Morris (Ed.).
29. Mogoutov A., Cambrosio A., Keating P., Mustar P. Biomedical innovation at the laboratory, clinical and commercial interface: A new method for mapping research projects, publications and patents in the field of microarrays. Journal of Informetrics 2008, 2(4):341-353.
30. Moody J., McFarland D., Bender-deMoll S. Dynamic network visualization. American Journal of Sociology 2005, 110(4):1206-1241.
31. Osgood C.E., Suci G., Tannenbaum P. The measurement of meaning 1957, Urbana, University of Illinois Press.
32. Salton G., McGill M.J. Introduction to modern information retrieval 1983, McGraw-Hill, Auckland.
33. Scheufele D.A. Framing as a theory of media effects. The Journal of Communication 1999, 49(1):103-122.
34. Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1973, 24(4):265-269.
35. Small H., Griffith B. The structure of scientific literature I. Science Studies 1974, 4:17-40.
36. Spark Jones K. A statistical interpretation of term importance in automatic indexing. Journal of Documentation 1972, 28(1):11-21.
37. Stegmann J., Grohmann G. Hypothesis generation guided by co-word clustering. Scientometrics 2003, 56(1):111-135.
38. Van Atteveldt W. Automatic codebook acquisition. Paper presented at the workshop Methods and Techniques Innovations and Applications in Political Science Politicologenetmaal 2005 Antwerp, May 19-20, 2005 2005, (Available at http://www.vanatteveldt.com/pub/pe05WvA.pdf).
39. Van Eck N.J., Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84(2):523-538.
40. White H.D. Author cocitation analysis and Pearson's r. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2003, 54(13):1250-1259.
41. White H.D. Reply to Bensman. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2004, 55(9):843-844.
42. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical investigations 1953, Macmillan, New York.