What do midwives think about interprofessional working and learning?

Midwifery

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 376-381

  Murray Davis, Beth ^a   Marshall, Michelle ^b   Gordon, Frances ^c  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Collaborative maternity care; Interprofessional working and learning; Midwives' perspectives

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MIDDLE AGED; MIDWIFE; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING PRACTICE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PUBLIC RELATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; CURRICULUM; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MIDDLE AGED; MIDWIFERY; NURSE'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH; PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 79957598012     PISSN: 02666138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.03.011     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Barnes D., Carpenter J., Dickinson C. The outcomes of partnerships with mental health service users in interprofessional education: A case study. Health and Social Care in the Community 2006, 14(5):426-435.
2. Barr H., Koppel I., Reeves S., Hammick M., Freeth D. Effective Interprofessional Education: Argument, Assumption and Evidence 2005, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford.
3. Barrett G., Keeping C. The processes required for effective interprofessional working. Interprofessional Working in Health and Social Care 2005, 18-32. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire. G. Barrett, D. Sellman, J. Thomas (Eds.).
4. Bluff R. Grounded theory. Principles and Practice of Research in Midwifery 2006, 153-170. Bailliere Tindall, London. E. Cluett, R. Bluff (Eds.).
5. Burke L.A., Miller M.K. Phone interviewing as a means of data collection: lessons learned and practical recommendations. Qualitative Social Research 2001, 2:1-6.
6. Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative A National Interprofessional Competency Framework 2010, College of Health Disciplines University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
7. Center for the Advancement of Interprofessional Education, 2006. Interprofessional education. (last accessed 22 October 2006). http://www.caipe.org.
8. D'Amour D., Oandasan I. Interprofessionality as the field of interprofessional practice and interprofessional education: an emerging concept. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2005, 19(Suppl. 1):8-20.
9. Department of Health National Service Framework for Children, Young People, and Maternity Services. Standard 11 2007, Maternity Services, London.
10. Ehrenreich B., English D. Witches, Midwives and Nurses: A History of Women Healers 1973, Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative, London.
11. Gordon, M.F., Marshall, M., Walsh, C.L., Wilson, F., Hunt, T., Ward, K., 2006. Combined Universities Interprofessional Learning Unit Final Report, Combined Universities Interprofessional Learning Unit.
12. Hind M., Norman I., Cooper S., et al. Interprofessional perceptions of health care students. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2003, 17:21-34.
13. Krueger R.A., Casey M.A. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research 2000, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
14. Murray-Davis B. Women's experiences of consultation: negotiating conflicting models of birth. Canadian Journal of Midwifery Research and Practice 2008, 7:22-30.
15. Nursing and Midwifery Council Standards of Proficiency for Pre-registration Midwifery Education 2004, Nursing and Midwifery Council, London.
16. Gilbert J.H.V. Interprofessional learning and higher education structural barriers. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2005, 19:87-106.
17. O'Halloran C., Hean S., Humphries D., Macleod-Clarke J. Interprofessional education in health and social care: fashion or informed practice?. Learning in Health and Social Care 2006, 5:220-242.
18. O'Neill O. Safe Maternity Teams. Safe Births: Everybody's Business. An Independent Inquiry into the Safety of Maternity Services in England 2008, Kings Fund, London, pp. 27-39.
19. Patton M.Q. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods 2002, Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, California.
20. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2008. Statement on the kings fund inquiry into maternity services. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
21. Seale C. Grounding theory. The Quality of Qualitative Research 1999, 87-105. Sage, London. C. Seale (Ed.).
22. Suter E., Arndt J., Arthur N., Parboosingh J., Taylor E., Deutschlander S. Role understanding and effective communication as core competencies for collaborative practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2009, 23:41-51.
23. Witz A. Professions and Patriarchy 1992, Routledge, New York.