The role of concretization in acquiring design knowledge

Learning in the Disciplines: ICLS 2010 Conference Proceedings - 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 468-475

  Fuhrmann, Tamar Ronen ^a   Kali, Yael ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCRETE DESIGN; DESIGN IDEAS; DESIGN KNOWLEDGE; GRADUATE STUDENTS; PEDAGOGICAL APPROACH;

CONCRETES; DESIGN; TEACHING;

STUDENTS;

EID: 79957591235     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2001). The systematic design of instruction (5th ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers.
2. DiGiano, C., Goldman, S., & Chorost, M. (2009). Educating learning technology designers: Guiding and inspiring creators of innovative educational tools. N.Y.: Routledge
3. Fuller, S. (1987). On regulating what is known: A way to social epistemology. Synthese, 73, 145-183.
4. Goldman, A. (2008). Social epistemology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2008 ed.).
5. Harel, I. (1991). Children designers: Interdisciplinary constructions for learning and knowing mathematics in a computer-rich school. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
6. Hoadley, C., & Kim, D. (2003). Learning, design and technology: The creation of a design studio for educational innovation. In A. P. d. Reis & P. Isaías (Eds.), Proceedings of the IADIS international conference e-Society 2003 (pp. 510-519). Lisbon, Portugal: IADIS Press.
7. Kafai, Y. (2006). Playing and making games for learning. Games and Culture, 1(1), 36-40.
8. Kali, Y. (2006). Collaborative knowledge building using the Design Principles Database. International Journal of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 187-201.
9. Kali, Y., & Linn, M. C. (2007). Technology-enhanced support strategies for inquiry learning. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. V. Merriënboer & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd Edition) (pp. 445-490). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Kali, Y. Linn, M. C., & Roseman, J. E. (2008). Designing coherent science education: Implications for curriculum, instruction, and policy. NY: Teachers College Press.
11. Kolodner, J. L., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., & Puntembakar, S. (2003). Putting a Student-Centered Learning by Design" Curriculum into Practice: Lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 495 - 548.
12. Maor, D., & Taylor, P. C. (1995). Teacher epistemology and scientific inquiry in computerized classroom environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(8), 839-854.
13. Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1-11). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14. Ronen-Fuhrmann, T., Kali, Y., & Hoadley, C. M. (2008). Helping education students understand learning through designing. Educational Technology, 48(2), 26-33.
15. Schommer, M. (1990). The effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498-504.
16. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
17. Stake, R. E. (1994). Case studies. In N. K. Densin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 236-247). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
18. Wilensky, U. (1991). Abstract meditations on the concrete and concrete implications for mathematics education. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism. Norwood, MA: Norwood, MA: Ablex Publishing.