Relationship between fetal head station established using an open magnetic resonance imaging scanner and the angle of progression determined by transperineal ultrasound

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 712-716

  Bamberg, C ^a   Scheuermann, S ^a   Slowinski, T ^a   Duckelmann A M ^a   Vogt, M ^a   Nguyen Dobinsky, T N ^a   Streitparth, F ^a   Teichgraber U ^a   Henrich, W ^a   Dudenhausen, J W ^a   Kalache, K D ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

angle of progression; fetal head station; labor; open magnetic resonance imaging; transperineal; ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; HEAD; HUMAN; LABOR STAGE 1; LABOR STAGE 2; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERINEUM; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; FEMALE; HEAD; HUMANS; LABOR PRESENTATION; LABOR STAGE, FIRST; LABOR STAGE, SECOND; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERINEUM; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 79957581221     PISSN: 09607692     EISSN: 14690705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/uog.8944     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Dupuis O, Silveira R, Zentner A, Dittmar A, Gaucherand P, Cucherat M, Redarce T, Rudigoz RC,. Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 868-874. (Pubitemid 40311282)
2. Olah KS,. Reversal of the decision for caesarean section in the second stage of labour on the basis of consultant vaginal assessment. J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 25: 115-116. (Pubitemid 43323021)
3. Buchmann E, Libhaber E,. Interobserver agreement in intrapartum estimation of fetal head station. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008; 101: 285-289.
4. Sherer DM, Abulafia O,. Intrapartum assessment of fetal head engagement: comparison between transvaginal digital and transabdominal ultrasound determinations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 430-436. (Pubitemid 36605702)
5. Friedman EA,. Labor. Clinical Evaluation and Management. Appleton-Century-Crofts: New York, 1978.
6. Crichton D,. A reliable method of establishing the level of the fetal head in obstetrics. S Afr Med J 1974; 48: 784-787.
7. Dietz HP, Lanzarone V,. Measuring engagement of the fetal head: validity and reproducibility of a new ultrasound technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25: 165-168. (Pubitemid 40299025)
8. Henrich W, Dudenhausen J, Fuchs I, Kamena A, Tutschek B,. Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 28: 753-760. (Pubitemid 44787458)
9. Eggebo TM, Gjessing LK, Heien C, Smedvig E, Okland I, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA,. Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 387-391. (Pubitemid 43735477)
10. Eggebo TM, Heien C, Okland I, Gjessing LK, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA,. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32: 199-204.
11. Maticot-Baptista D, Ramanah R, Collin A, Martin A, Maillet R, Riethmuller D,. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal head engagement. A preliminary French prospective study. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2009; 38: 474-480.
12. Ghi T, Farina A, Pedrazzi A, Rizzo N, Pelusi G, Pilu G,. Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 331-336.
13. Barbera AF, Pombar X, Perugino G, Lezotte DC, Hobbins JC,. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 313-319.
14. Kalache KD, Duckelmann AM, Michaelis SA, Lange J, Cichon G, Dudenhausen JW,. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the 'angle of progression' predict the mode of delivery? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 326-330.
15. Akmal S, Tsoi E, Kametas N, Howard R, Nicolaides KH,. Intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2002; 12: 172-177.
16. Duckelmann AM, Bamberg C, Michaelis SA, Lange J, Nonnenmacher A, Dudenhausen JW, Kalache KD,. Measurement of fetal head descent using the 'angle of progression' on transperineal ultrasound imaging is reliable regardless of fetal head station or ultrasound expertise. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 216-222.
17. Barbera AF, Imani F, Becker T, Lezotte DC, Hobbins JC,. Anatomic relationship between the pubic symphysis and ischial spines and its clinical significance in the assessment of fetal head engagement and station during labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 320-325.
18. Stark DD, McCarthy SM, Filly RA, Parer JT, Hricak H, Callen PW,. Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985; 144: 947-950. (Pubitemid 15032462)
19. Zaretsky MV, McIntire DD, Twickler DM,. Feasibility of the fetal anatomic and maternal pelvic survey by magnetic resonance imaging at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 997-1001. (Pubitemid 37373886)
20. th edn). Appleton & Lange: Norwalk, CT, 1989.
21. Auer ES, Simmons JM Jr,. The floating fetal head in the primipara at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1949; 58: 291-298.
22. Burke L, Rubin HW, Berenberg AL,. The significance of the unengaged vertex in a nullipara at thirty-eight weeks' gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1958; 76: 132-136.
23. Rolnick SJ, Hyer B, Jackson J, Loes L,. Implementation of an active management of labor guideline in a managed care setting. Qual Manag Health Care 1998; 6: 35-42.
24. Diegmann EK, Chez RA, Danclair WG,. Station in early labor in nulliparous women at term. J Nurse Midwifery 1995; 40: 382-385.
25. Peisner DB, Rosen MG,. Latent phase of labor in normal patients: a reassessment. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 644-648. (Pubitemid 16216153)
26. Pfammatter T, Marincek B, von Schulthess GK, Dudenhausen JW,. MR pelvimetric reference values. Rofo 1990; 153: 706-710.
27. Sherer DM,. Intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 123-139. (Pubitemid 47266014)
28. Yeo L, Romero R,. Sonographic evaluation in the second stage of labor to improve the assessment of labor progress and its outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 253-258.