Feasibility of the fetal anatomic and maternal pelvic survey by magnetic resonance imaging at term

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 189, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 997-1001

  Zaretsky, Michael V ^a   McIntire, Donald D ^a   Twickler, Diane M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Fetus; Magnetic resonance imaging; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

FETUS SEX; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; AMNION FLUID ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; BRAIN VENTRICLE; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS (ANATOMY); FETUS BLADDER; FETUS BRAIN; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS HEART; FETUS KIDNEY; FETUS OUTCOME; FETUS STOMACH; HUMAN; KIDNEY; NEWBORN; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PELVIS; PERINATAL PERIOD; PLACENTA; PRENATAL PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX; STOMACH; UMBILICAL CORD;

EID: 0242425759     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00835-4     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Kanal E. Pregnancy and the safety of magnetic resonance imaging. MRI Clin North Am 1994;2:309-17.
2. Baker PN, Johnson IR, Harvey PR, Gowland PA, Mansfield P. A three-year follow-up of children imaged in utero with echo-planar magnetic resonance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:32-3.
3. Clements H, Duncan KR, Fielding K, Gowland PA, Johnson IR, Barker PN. Infants exposed to MRI in utero have a normal paediatric assessment of 9 months of age. Br J Radiol 2000;73:190-4.
4. Twickler DM, Magee KP, Caire JT, Zaretsky M, Ramus RM. Second opinion magnetic resonance imaging for suspected fetal central nervous system abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:492-6.
5. Levine D, Barnes PD, Madsen JR, Abbott J, Mehta T, Edelman RR. Central nervous system abnormalities assessed with prenatal magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:1011-9.
6. Walsh DS, Hubbard AM, Olutoye OO, Howell LJ, Crombleholme TM, Flake AW, et al. Assessment of fetal lung volumes and liver herniation with magnetic resonance imaging in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:1067-9.
7. Zaretsky MV, Ramus RM, Twickler DM. Fast acquisition magnetic resonance fetal survey: is it feasible? J Soc Gynecol Invest 2002;9(Suppl):106A.
8. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Ultrasonography in pregnancy. Washington (DC): The College; 1993. ACOG technical bulletin No.: 187.
9. Levine D, Barnes PD. Cortical maturation in normal and abnormal fetuses as assessed with prenatal MR imaging. Radiology 1999;210:751-8.
10. Michel SC, Rake A, Keller TM, Huch R, Konig V, Seifert B, et al. Fetal cardiographic monitoring during 1.5-T MR Imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:1159-64.
11. Poutamo J, Vanninen R, Partanen K, Kirkinen P. Diagnosing fetal urinary tract abnormalities: benefits of MRI compared to ultrasonagraphy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79:63-71.