Characterization of nanoporous membranes for implementation in an osmotic glucose sensor based on the concanavalin A-dextran affinity assay

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 376, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 153-161

  Krushinitskaya, Olga ^a   Tønnessen, Tor Inge ^b   Jakobsen, Henrik ^a   Johannessen, Erik A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH EASTERN NORWAY   (Norway)

^b OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Affinity assay.; Flux rates; Molecules; Nanoporous membranes; Osmotic pressure

Indexed keywords

AFFINITY ASSAY.; ANODIC ALUMINIUM OXIDE; FLUX RATES; FUNCTIONAL MEMBRANES; MEMBRANE THICKNESS; MOLECULAR COMPONENTS; MOLECULAR CONSTITUENTS; MOLECULAR LEVELS; NANOPOROUS MEMBRANE; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; RESPONSE TIME; VISCOUS MATRIX;

ANODIC OXIDATION; CERAMIC MEMBRANES; DEXTRAN; ENZYME SENSORS; GLUCOSE SENSORS; MEMBRANES; OSMOSIS; SENSORS;

GLUCOSE;

ALBUMIN; ALUMINUM OXIDE; CONCANAVALIN A; DEXTRAN; GLUCOSE;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CERAMICS; OSMOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME;

EID: 79957555267     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Heller A., Feldman B. Electrochemical glucose sensors and their applications in diabetes management. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108:2482-2505.
2. Wang J. Glucose biosensors: 40 years of advances and challenges. Electroanalysis 2001, 13:983-988.
3. Koschinsky T., Heinemann L. Sensors for glucose monitoring: technical and clinical aspects. Diabetes: Metab. Res. Rev. 2001, 17:113-123.
4. Burmeister J.J., Chung H., Arnold M.A. Phantoms for noninvasive blood glucose sensing with near infrared transmission spectroscopy. Photochem. Photobiol. 1998, 67:50-55.
5. Yu Y.Z., Crothall K.D., Jahn L., Destefano M. Laser diode applications in a continuous blood glucose sensor. SPIE Proc. Ser. 2003, 4996:268-274.
6. Enejder A.M., Scecina T.G., Oh J., Hunter M., Shih W., Sasic S., Horowitz V., Feld M.S. Raman spectroscopy for noninvasive glucose measurements. J. Biomed. Opt. 2005, 10:031114.
7. Ansari R.R., Böckle S., Rovati L. New optical scheme for a polarimetric-based glucose sensor. J. Biomed. Opt. 2004, 9:103-115.
8. Caduff A., Hirt E., Feldman Y., Ali Z., Heinemann L. First human experiments with a novel non-invasive, non-optical continuous glucose monitoring system. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2003, 19:209-217.
9. Ehwald R., Ballerstadt R., Dautzenberg H. Viscosimetric affinity assay. Anal. Biochem. 1996, 234:1-8.
10. Ballerstadt R., Schultz J.S. A fluorescence affinity hollow fiber sensor for continuous transdermal glucose monitoring. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72:4185-4192.
11. Kuenzi S., Meurville E., Ryser P. Automated characterization of dextran/concanavalin A mixtures: A study of sensitivity and temperature dependence at low viscosity as basis for an implantable glucose sensor. Sens. Actuator B: Chem. 2010, 146:1-7.
12. Krieftewirth M., Beyer U., Doss A., Ehwald R. Affinity sensor based on a membrane osmometer. Tech. Mess. 2004, 71:29-33.
13. Lin G., Chang S., Hao H., Tathireddy P., Orthner M., Magda J., Solzbacher F. Osmotic swelling pressure response of smart hydrogels suitable for chronically implantable glucose sensors. Sens. Actuator B: Chem. 2010, 144:332-336.
14. Johannessen E., Krushinitskaya O., Sokolov A., Häfliger P., Hoogerwerf A., Hinderling C., Kautio K., Lenkkeri J., Esko Strommer E., Kondratyev V., Tønnessen T.I., Mollnes T.E., Jakobsen H., Zimmer E., Akselsen B. Toward an injectable continuous osmotic glucose sensor. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2010, 4:882-892.
15. Meylan S., Hammes F., Traber J., Salhi E. Permeability of low molecular weight organics trough nanofiltration membranes. Water Res. 2007, 41:3968-3976.
16. Schafer A.I., Fane A.G., Waite T.D. Nanofiltration Principles and Application 2005, Elsevier Science, Oxford.
17. Rauthenbach R., Albrecht R. Membrane Processes 1989, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester.
18. Shah T.N., Foley H.C., Zydney A.L. Development and characterization of nanoporous carbon membranes for protein ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 295:40-49.
19. Mulder J. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology 1996, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. 2nd ed.
20. Huisman I.H., Pradanos P., Hernandez A. The effect of protein-protein and protein-membrane interactions on membrane fouling in ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 179:79-90.
21. Osmanbeyoglu H.U., Hur T.B., Kim H.K. Thin alumina nanoporous membranes for similar size biomolecule separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 343:1-6.
22. Hsiao J.K., Ball B.A., Morrison P.F., Mefford I.N., Bungay P.M. Effects of different semipermeable membranes on in vitro and in vivo performance of microdialysis probes. J. Neurochem. 1990, 54:1449-1452.
23. Tang C.Y.Y., Kwon Y.N., Leckie J.O. Effect of membrane chemistry and coating layer on physiochemical properties of thin film composite polyamide RO and NF membranes. I. FTIR and XPS characterization of polyamide and coating layer chemistry. Desalination 2009, 242:149-167.
24. Baker R. Membrane Technology and Applications 2004, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester. 2nd ed.
25. Zsigmondy R., Bachmann W. Uber neue filter. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1918, 103:119-128.
26. Kutowy O., Thayer W.L., Sourirajan S. Cellulose ester ultra-filtration membranes and their manufacture. United States Patent Office 1979, 9. Canadian Patents and Development Limited, Canada.
27. Ito Y. Cellulose acetate film having controlled retardation and thickness. United States Patent Office 2006, 23. Fuji Photo Film Co. Ltd., Japan.
28. Desai T.A., Hansford D.J., Leoni L., Essenpreis M., Ferrari M. Nanoporous anti-fouling silicon membranes for biosensor applications. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2000, 15:453-462.
29. Apel P. Track etching technigue in membrane technology. Radiat. Meas. 2001, 34:559-566.
30. Hsieh H.P., Bhave R.R., Fleming H.L. Microporous alumina membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1988, 39:221-241.
31. Bhave R.R. Inorganic Membranes: Synthesis, Characteristics, and Applications 1991, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. 1st ed.
32. A. Sokolov, B.C. Hellerud, A. Pharo, E.A. Johannessen, T.E. Mollnes, Complement activation by candidate biomaterials of an implantable microfabricated medical device, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B: Appl. Biomater., in press.
33. Atkins P.W. Physical Chemistry 1994, Oxford University Press, Oxford. 5th ed.
34. Atkins P., de Paula J. Elements of Physical Chemistry 1992, Oxford University Press, Oxford. 1st ed.
35. Vilker V.L., Colton C.K., Smith K.A. The osmotic pressure of concentrated protein solutions: effect of the concentration on pH in saline solutions of bovine serum albumin. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1981, 79:548-566.
36. Zhou Y. Salt effects on protein titration and binding. J. Phys. Chem. 1998, 102:10615-10621.
37. Kuenzi S. Implantable glucose sensor: an approach based on a rotating microviscometer combined with a sensitive liquid containing dextran and Concanavalin A. STI Faculté des sciences et techniques de l'ingénieur 2007, 186. Lausanne, EPFL.
38. Ballerstadt R., Evans C., Gowda A., McNichols R. In vivo performance evaluation of a transdermal near-infrared fluorescence resonance energy transfer affinity sensor for continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2006, 8:296-311.
39. Ballerstadt R., Kholodnykh A., Evans C., Boretsky A., Motamedi M., Gowda A., McNichols R. Affinity-based turbidity sensor for glucose monitoring by optical choherence tomography: toward the development of an implantable sensor. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79:6965-6974.