On maintaining consistency of process model variants

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Volumn 66 LNBIP, Issue , 2011, Pages 289-300

  Pascalau, Emilian ^a   Awad, Ahmed ^a   Sakr, Sherif ^b   Weske, Mathias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Business process design; Process variants; Querying business processes; Reuse

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; QUERY LANGUAGES;

AUTOMATED MAINTENANCE; BUSINESS PROCESS DESIGN; BUSINESS PROCESS MODEL; DYNAMIC EVALUATION; HOLISTIC VIEW; IT SYSTEM; PROCESS MODEL; PROCESS VARIANTS; PROCESS VIEW; QUERYING BUSINESS PROCESSES; REUSE; VIEW-BASED APPROACH; VISUAL QUERY LANGUAGES;

PROCESS DESIGN;

EID: 79957480123     PISSN: 18651348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-20511-8_28     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Weske, M.: Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
2. Awad, A.: BPMN-Q: A Language to Query Business Processes. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architecture (EMISA 2007). LNI, vol. P-119, pp. 115-128. GI (2007)
3. Sakr, S., Awad, A.: A framework for querying graph-based business process models. In: Proceedings of the 19th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW2010), pp. 1297-1300. ACM, New York (2010)
4. OMG: Business Process Modeling Notation 1.2 (BPMN 1.2) Specification, Final Adopted Specification. Technical report, OMG (2009)
5. Keller, G., Nüttgens, M., Scheer, A.: Semantische Prozessmodellierung auf der Grundlage Ereignisgesteuerter Prozessketten (EPK). Technical Report 89, Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Saarbrücken (1992)
6. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: YAWL: yet another workflow language. Information Systems 30(4), 245-275 (2005)
7. OMG: UML 2.0 Superstructure Specification (August 2005), http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.0/Superstructure/PDF/
8. Vanhatalo, J., Völzer, H., Koehler, J.: The refined process structure tree. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 100-115. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
9. Rosemann, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: A Configurable Reference Modelling Language. Information Systems 32(1), 1-23 (2007)
10. Reijers, H.A., Mans, R.S., van der Toorn, R.A.: Improved Model Management with Aggregated Business Process Models. Data Knowledge Engineering 68(2), 221-243 (2009)
11. Baier, T., Pascalau, E., Mendling, J.: On the suitability of aggregated and configurable business process models. In: Bider, I., Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Ukor, R. (eds.) BPMDS 2010 and EMMSAD 2010. LNBIP, vol. 50, pp. 108-119. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
12. Decker, G., Overdick, H., Weske, M.: Oryx - Sharing Conceptual Models on the Web. In: Li, Q., Spaccapietra, S., Yu, E., Olivé, A. (eds.) ER 2008. LNCS, vol. 5231, pp. 536-537. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
13. Rosa, M.L., Reijers, H., Aalst, W., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J., Dumas, M., Garcia-Banuelos, L.: Apromore: An advanced process model repository (2009), http://eprints.qut.edu.au/27448/
14. Estublier, J., Casallas, R.: The Adele Software Configuration Manager. Configuration Management. Trends in Software (1994)
15. Tryggeseth, E., Gulla, B., Conradi, R.: Modelling Systems with Variability using the PROTEUS Configuration Language. In: Estublier, J. (ed.) ICSE-WS 1993/1995 and SCM 1993/1995. LNCS, vol. 1005, pp. 216-240. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)
16. Turkay, E., Gokhale, A.S., Natarajan, B.: Addressing the middleware configuration challenges using model-based techniques. In: ACM Southeast Regional Conference, pp. 166-170. ACM, New York (2004)
17. Batory, D.S., Geraci, B.J.: Composition Validation and Subjectivity in GenVoca Generators. IEEE Trans. Software Engineering 23(2), 67-84 (1997)
18. Czarnecki, K., Helsen, S., Eisenecker, U.: Formalizing Cardinality-Based Feature Models and Their Specialization. Software Process: Improvement and Practice 10(1), 7-29 (2005)
19. Schobbens, P.Y., Heymans, P., Trigaux, J.C.: Feature Diagrams: A Survey and a Formal Semantics. In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2006), pp. 138-148 (2006), http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/RE.2006.23
20. Lu, R., Sadiq, S.W.: Managing Process Variants as an Information Resource. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, pp. 426-431. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
21. Lu, R., Sadiq, S.W.: On the Discovery of Preferred Work Practice Through Business Process Variants. In: Parent, C., Schewe, K.-D., Storey, V.C., Thalheim, B. (eds.) ER 2007. LNCS, vol. 4801, pp. 165-180. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
22. van der Aalst, W., Basten, T.: Inheritance of Workflows: An approach to tackling problems related to change. Computing Science Report 99(06) (1999), http://is.tm.tue.nl/staff/wvdaalst/publications/p85.pdf
23. Basten, T., van der Aalst, W.: Inheritance of Behavior. Computing Science Report 99(17) (1999), http://is.tm.tue.nl/staff/wvdaalst/publications/p93.pdf
24. Puhlmann, F., Schnieders, A., Weiland, J., Weske, M.: Variability mechanisms for process models. Technical Report 17/2005, Hasso-Plattner-Institut (June 2005)
25. Schnieders, A., Puhlmann, F.: Variability mechanisms in e-business process families. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Information Systems (BIS 2006). LNI, vol. 85, pp. 583-601. GI (2006)
26. Lu, R., Sadiq, S.W., Governatori, G., Yang, X.: Defining Adaptation Constraints for Business Process Variants. In: Abramowicz,W. (ed.) BIS 2009. LNBIP, vol. 21, pp. 145-156. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
27. Rosa,M.L., Lux, J., Seidel, S., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Questionnaire-driven Configuration of Reference Process Models. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007 and WES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 424-438. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)