On the suitability of aggregated and configurable business process models

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Volumn 50 LNBIP, Issue , 2010, Pages 108-119

  Baier, Thomas ^a   Pascalau, Emilian ^b   Mendling, Jan ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

C (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE); INDUSTRY; MODELS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

BUSINESS DOMAIN; BUSINESS PROCESS MODEL; COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE; COMPLEX CONFIGURATION; COMPLEXITY ISSUES; INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS; PROCESS MODELING LANGUAGE; REFERENCE MODELS;

AGGREGATES;

EID: 79957487445     PISSN: 18651348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13051-9_10     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Küster, J.M., Koehler, J., Ryndina, K.: Improving Business Process Models with Reference Models in Business-Driven Development. In: Eder, J., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2006. LNCS, vol. 4103, pp. 35-44. Springer, Heidelberg (2006) (Pubitemid 44543234)
2. Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Classification of reference models: a methodology and its application. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 35-53 (2003)
3. Thomas, O.: Understanding the Term Reference Model in Information Systems Research: History, Literature Analysis and Explanation. In: Bussler, C.J., Haller, A. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3812, pp. 484-496. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
4. Rosemann, M., Aalst, W.: A configurable reference modelling language. Inf. Syst. 32(1), 1-23 (2007) (Pubitemid 44537594)
5. La Rosa, M., Marlon, D.: Configurable Process Models: How To Adopt Standard Practices In Your How Way? (2008)
6. Reijers, H., Mans, R., Toorn, R.: Improved model management with aggregated business process models. Data Knowl. Eng. 68(2), 221-243 (2009)
7. Mendling, J.: Metrics for Process Models: Empirical Foundations of Verification, Error Prediction, and Guidelines for Correctness. LNBIP, vol. 6 (2008)
8. Aalst, W., Dreiling, A., Gottschalk, F., Rosemann, M., Jansen-Vullers, M.: Configurable Process Models as a Basis for Reference Modeling. In: Bussler, C.J., Haller, A. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3812, pp. 512-518. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
9. Kindler, E., Nüttgens, M. (eds.): Business Process Reference Models. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Business Process Reference Models, BPRM 2005 (2005)
10. La Rosa, M., Aalst, W., Dumas, M., Ter hofstede, A.H.M.: Questionnaire-based variability modeling for system configuration. Software and Systems Modeling (2008)
11. Aalst, W.: Formalization and Verification of EPCs (1999)
12. Estublier, J., Casallas, R.: The Adele Software Configuration Manager. In: Tichy, W. (ed.) Configuration Management. Trends in software. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1994)
13. Tryggeseth, E., Gulla, B., Conradi, R.: Modelling Systems with Variability using the PROTEUS Configuration Language. In: Estublier, J. (ed.) ICSE-WS 1993/1995 and SCM 1993/1995. LNCS, vol. 1005, pp. 216-240. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)
14. Turkay, E., Gokhale, A., Natarajan, B.: Addressing the Middleware Configuration Challenges using Model-based Techniques. In: Yoo, S., Etzkorn, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Southeast Regional Conference, pp. 166-170. ACM Press, New York (2004)
15. Batory, D., Geraci, B.: Composition Validation and Subjectivity in GenVoca Generators. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 23(2), 67-84 (1997)
16. Czarnecki, K., Helsen, S., Eisenecker, U.: Formalizing Cardinality-Based Feature Models and Their Specialization. Software Process: Improvement and Practice 10(1), 7-29 (2005) (Pubitemid 40384707)
17. Schobbens, P.Y., Heymans, P., Trigaux, J.C.: Feature Diagrams: A Survey and a Formal Semantics. In: Glinz, M., Lutz, R. (eds.) Int. Conf. on Req. Eng., pp. 136-145 (2006) (Pubitemid 351424208)
18. La Rosa, M., Dumas, M., Hofstede, A., Mendling, J., Gottschalk, F.: Beyond Control-Flow: Extending Business Process Configuration to Roles and Objects. In: Li, Q., Spaccapietra, S., Yu, E., Olivé, A. (eds.) ER 2008. LNCS, vol. 5231, pp. 199-215. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
19. Becker, J., Delfmann, P., Dreiling, A., Knackstedt, R., Kuropka, D.: Configurative Process Modeling - Outlining an Approach to increased Business Process Model Usability. In: Khosrow-Pour, M. (ed.) Proceedings of the 14th Information Resources Management Association International Conference, pp. 615-619. IRM Press (2004)
20. Delfmann, P.: Adaptive Referenzmodellierung. Methodische Konzepte zur Konstruktion und Anwendung wiederverwendungsorientierter Informations-modelle. Logos (2006) (in German)
21. Delfmann, P., Janiesch, C., Knackstedt, R., Rieke, T., Seidel, S.: Towards Tool Support for Configurative Reference Modeling - Experiences from a Meta-Modeling Teaching Case. In: Brockmans, S., Jung, J., Sure, Y. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Meta-Modelling. LNI, vol. 96, pp. 61-83 (2006)
22. Puhlmann, F., Schnieders, A., Weiland, J., Weske, M.: Variability mechanisms for process models. PESOA-Report 17/2005, Hasso-Plattner-Institut (June 2005)
23. Schnieders, A., Puhlmann, F.: Variability Mechanisms in E-Business Process Families. In: Abramowicz, W., Mayr, H. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Business Information Systems. LNI, vol. 85, pp. 583-601 (2006)
24. Razavian, M., Khosravi, R.: Modeling Variability in Business Process Models Using UML. In: Latifi, S. (ed.) Proceedings of ITGN 2008, pp. 82-87 (2008) (Pubitemid 351709586)
25. Reinhartz-Berger, I., Soffer, P., Sturm, A.: A domain engineering approach to specifying and applying reference models. In: Desel, J., Frank, U. (eds.) EMISA 2005. LNI, vol. 75, pp. 50-63 (2005)
26. Czarnecki, K., Antkiewicz, M.: Mapping Features to Models: A Template Approach Based on Superimposed Variants. In: Glück, R., Lowry, M.R. (eds.) Proc. of the 4th Int. Conf. on Generative Programming and Component Eng., pp. 422-437 (2005)
27. Gottschalk, F., Aalst, W., Jansen-Vullers, M.: Configurable Process Models - A Foundational Approach. In: Becker, J., Delfmann, P. (eds.) Reference Modeling, pp. 59-78. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
28. Gottschalk, F., Aalst, W., Jansen-Vullers, M.H., La Rosa, M.: Configurable workflow models. Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst. 17(2), 177-221 (2008)
29. Aalst, W., Basten, T.: Inheritance of Workflows: An Approach to Tackling Problems Related to Change. Theoretical Computer Science 270(1-2), 125-203 (2002) (Pubitemid 33142231)
30. Aalst, W., Dumas, M., Gottschalk, F., Hofstede, A., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J.: Correctness-preserving configuration of business process models. In: Fiadeiro, J.L., Inverardi, P. (eds.) FASE 2008. LNCS, vol. 4961, pp. 46-61. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
31. Aalst,W., Dumas, M., Gottschalk, F., Hofstede, A., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J.: Preserving correctness during business process model configuration. Formal Aspects of Computing, 1-24 (2009)